Skip to main content
Log in

The Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an increasing growth in mutual funds that invest according to social criteria. As a consequence, the financial performance of these portfolios has attracted the interest of academics and practitioners. This paper investigates the performance of a sample of socially responsible mutual funds from seven European countries investing globally and/or in the European market. Using unconditional and conditional models, we assess the performance of these funds in comparison to conventional and socially responsible benchmark portfolios. The results show that European socially responsible funds present in general neutral performance in relation to both conventional and socially responsible benchmarks. However, performance estimates seem to be slightly higher when funds are evaluated in relation to socially responsible indices. Our results also show that socially responsible funds are more exposed to conventional than to socially responsible indices. Furthermore, conventional benchmarks are better able to explain fund returns than socially responsible benchmarks. These findings are robust to both unconditional and conditional models of performance. We also observe that conditional models lead to a slight improvement of performance estimates and to the explanatory power of the models, both when conventional and socially responsible benchmarks are considered. This is consistent with most previous empirical findings on conditional performance evaluation. Our results show that investors who wish to hold European funds can add social screens to their investment choices without compromising financial performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Otten, R. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: new evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9099-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund Performance and Investment Style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Rad, A.T. (2006). Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14(1), 33–48. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, Z.Y. (2005). Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. Journal of Financial Research, 28(1), 41–57. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6803.2005.00113.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, I., & Jung, B.S. (1979). The interpretation of least squares regression with interaction or polynomial terms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(3), 481–483. doi:10.2307/1926085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T.S., & Pagan, A.R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47, 1287–1294. doi:10.2307/1911963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–83. doi:10.2307/2329556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson, J., Ferson, W., & Glassman, D. (1998). Conditioning manager alphas on economic information: another look at the persistence of performance. Review of Financial Studies, 11(1), 111–142. doi:10.1093/rfs/11.1.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Asymptotic inference under heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 45, 215–233. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00366-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., & Blake, C.R. (1996). The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 69(2), 133–157. doi:10.1086/209685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1989). Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 23–49. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(89)90095-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and K. R. French: 1993, `Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds', Journal of Financial Economics 33(1), 3–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, W., Sarkissian, S., & Simin, T. (2003). Is stock return predictability spurious? Journal of Investment Management, 1(3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, W., & Schadt, R. (1996). Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions. The Journal of Finance, 51(2), 425–461. doi:10.2307/2329367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldreyer, E.F., & Diltz, J.D. (1999). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: incorporating sociopolitical information in portfolio selection. Managerial Finance, 25(1), 23–36. doi:10.1108/03074359910765830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., Matatko, J., & Luther, R. (1997). Ethical unit trust financial performance: small company effects and fund size effects. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(5), 705–725. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Whittaker, J. (2007). Performance and performance persistence of Ethical unit trusts in the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(7/8), 1327–1344. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02006.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerard, J.B. (1997). Is there a cost to being socially responsible in investing? Journal of Investing, 6(2), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31. doi:10.1177/000765039703600102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, B.R., & Sharpe, W.F. (1986). Financial implications of South African divestment. Financial Analysts Journal, 42, 15–29. doi:10.2469/faj.v42.n4.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66. doi:10.2469/faj.v49.n6.62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23, 389–416. doi:10.2307/2325404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D.B., & Stambaugh, R.F. (1986). Predicting returns in the stock and bond markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 357–390. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(86)90070-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreander, N., Gray, R.H., Power, D.M., & Sinclair, C.D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: a matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7/8), 1465–1493. doi:10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00636.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, L., & DiBartolomeo, D. (1996). Socially screened portfolios: an attribution analysis of relative performance. Journal of Investing, 5(3), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther, R.G., & Matatko, J. (1994). The performance of ethical unit trusts: choosing an appropriate benchmark. The British Accounting Review, 26(1), 77–89. doi:10.1006/bare.1994.1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther, R. G., J. Matatko and D. C. Corner: 1992, ‹The Investment Performance of UK Ethical Unit Trusts’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 5(4), 57–70. doi:10.1108/09513579210019521

  • Mallin, C.A., Saadouni, B., & Briston, R.J. (1995). The financial performance of ethical investment funds. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(4), 483–496. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00373.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W.K., & West, K.D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 631–653. doi:10.2307/2297912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, M.G., & Grieb, T. (1998). The external performance of socially-responsible mutual funds. American Business Review, 16(1), 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests Part I on past and potential testability of the theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129–176. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(77)90009-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1978). Ambiguity when performance is measured by the Securities Market Line. The Journal of Finance, 33(4), 1051–1064 doi:10.2307/2326939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, D.A. (1997). The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini equity mutual fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–149. doi:10.1016/S1058-3300(97)90002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B. (2005). Style and performance of Dutch social responsible investment funds. Journal of Investing, 14(1), 63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, M. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122–142. doi:10.1007/s11408-004-0202-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 30–39 doi:10.2469/faj.v56.n3.2358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M. (2006). Socially Responsible Indexes: Composition, Performance and Tracking Error. Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, J.L., & Mazuy, K. (1966). Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review, 44, 131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. and S. B. Graves: 1997, ‹The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), 303–319. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 149–170 doi:10.2307/1912934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. 1987. “Ethics in Finance”, In D. Paxson and D. Wood (eds), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Finance Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK, pp. 59–62

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the financial support of FCT, POCTI and the European Communitarian Fund FEDER. The authors are also grateful for helpful comments from Dean Paxson, Chris Adcock and participants in the Workshop “Socially Responsible Investing and Financial Performance”, as well as participants in the EBEN Research Conference 2007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Ceu Cortez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortez, M.C., Silva, F. & Areal, N. The Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds. J Bus Ethics 87, 573–588 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9959-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9959-x

Keywords

Navigation