Abstract
Recent years have witnessed an increasing growth in mutual funds that invest according to social criteria. As a consequence, the financial performance of these portfolios has attracted the interest of academics and practitioners. This paper investigates the performance of a sample of socially responsible mutual funds from seven European countries investing globally and/or in the European market. Using unconditional and conditional models, we assess the performance of these funds in comparison to conventional and socially responsible benchmark portfolios. The results show that European socially responsible funds present in general neutral performance in relation to both conventional and socially responsible benchmarks. However, performance estimates seem to be slightly higher when funds are evaluated in relation to socially responsible indices. Our results also show that socially responsible funds are more exposed to conventional than to socially responsible indices. Furthermore, conventional benchmarks are better able to explain fund returns than socially responsible benchmarks. These findings are robust to both unconditional and conditional models of performance. We also observe that conditional models lead to a slight improvement of performance estimates and to the explanatory power of the models, both when conventional and socially responsible benchmarks are considered. This is consistent with most previous empirical findings on conditional performance evaluation. Our results show that investors who wish to hold European funds can add social screens to their investment choices without compromising financial performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Otten, R. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: new evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9099-0
Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund Performance and Investment Style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.035
Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Rad, A.T. (2006). Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14(1), 33–48. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.12.004
Bello, Z.Y. (2005). Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. Journal of Financial Research, 28(1), 41–57. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6803.2005.00113.x
Bernhardt, I., & Jung, B.S. (1979). The interpretation of least squares regression with interaction or polynomial terms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(3), 481–483. doi:10.2307/1926085
Breusch, T.S., & Pagan, A.R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47, 1287–1294. doi:10.2307/1911963
Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–83. doi:10.2307/2329556
Christopherson, J., Ferson, W., & Glassman, D. (1998). Conditioning manager alphas on economic information: another look at the persistence of performance. Review of Financial Studies, 11(1), 111–142. doi:10.1093/rfs/11.1.111
Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Asymptotic inference under heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 45, 215–233. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00366-3
Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., & Blake, C.R. (1996). The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 69(2), 133–157. doi:10.1086/209685
Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1989). Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 23–49. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(89)90095-0
Fama, E. F. and K. R. French: 1993, `Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds', Journal of Financial Economics 33(1), 3–56
Ferson, W., Sarkissian, S., & Simin, T. (2003). Is stock return predictability spurious? Journal of Investment Management, 1(3), 1–10.
Ferson, W., & Schadt, R. (1996). Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions. The Journal of Finance, 51(2), 425–461. doi:10.2307/2329367
Goldreyer, E.F., & Diltz, J.D. (1999). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: incorporating sociopolitical information in portfolio selection. Managerial Finance, 25(1), 23–36. doi:10.1108/03074359910765830
Gregory, A., Matatko, J., & Luther, R. (1997). Ethical unit trust financial performance: small company effects and fund size effects. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(5), 705–725. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00130
Gregory, A., & Whittaker, J. (2007). Performance and performance persistence of Ethical unit trusts in the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(7/8), 1327–1344. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02006.x
Guerard, J.B. (1997). Is there a cost to being socially responsible in investing? Journal of Investing, 6(2), 11–18.
Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31. doi:10.1177/000765039703600102
Grossman, B.R., & Sharpe, W.F. (1986). Financial implications of South African divestment. Financial Analysts Journal, 42, 15–29. doi:10.2469/faj.v42.n4.15
Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66. doi:10.2469/faj.v49.n6.62
Jensen, M. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23, 389–416. doi:10.2307/2325404
Keim, D.B., & Stambaugh, R.F. (1986). Predicting returns in the stock and bond markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 357–390. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(86)90070-X
Kreander, N., Gray, R.H., Power, D.M., & Sinclair, C.D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: a matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7/8), 1465–1493. doi:10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00636.x
Kurtz, L., & DiBartolomeo, D. (1996). Socially screened portfolios: an attribution analysis of relative performance. Journal of Investing, 5(3), 35–41.
Luther, R.G., & Matatko, J. (1994). The performance of ethical unit trusts: choosing an appropriate benchmark. The British Accounting Review, 26(1), 77–89. doi:10.1006/bare.1994.1007
Luther, R. G., J. Matatko and D. C. Corner: 1992, ‹The Investment Performance of UK Ethical Unit Trusts’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 5(4), 57–70. doi:10.1108/09513579210019521
Mallin, C.A., Saadouni, B., & Briston, R.J. (1995). The financial performance of ethical investment funds. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(4), 483–496. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00373.x
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659
McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342
Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.
Newey, W.K., & West, K.D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 631–653. doi:10.2307/2297912
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910
Reyes, M.G., & Grieb, T. (1998). The external performance of socially-responsible mutual funds. American Business Review, 16(1), 1–7
Roll, R. (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests Part I on past and potential testability of the theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129–176. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(77)90009-5
Roll, R. (1978). Ambiguity when performance is measured by the Securities Market Line. The Journal of Finance, 33(4), 1051–1064 doi:10.2307/2326939
Sauer, D.A. (1997). The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini equity mutual fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–149. doi:10.1016/S1058-3300(97)90002-1
Scholtens, B. (2005). Style and performance of Dutch social responsible investment funds. Journal of Investing, 14(1), 63–72
Schröder, M. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122–142. doi:10.1007/s11408-004-0202-1
Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 30–39 doi:10.2469/faj.v56.n3.2358
Statman, M. (2006). Socially Responsible Indexes: Composition, Performance and Tracking Error. Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109
Treynor, J.L., & Mazuy, K. (1966). Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review, 44, 131–136
Waddock, S. A. and S. B. Graves: 1997, ‹The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), 303–319. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
White, H. (1980). A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 149–170 doi:10.2307/1912934
Wood, D. 1987. “Ethics in Finance”, In D. Paxson and D. Wood (eds), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Finance Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK, pp. 59–62
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the financial support of FCT, POCTI and the European Communitarian Fund FEDER. The authors are also grateful for helpful comments from Dean Paxson, Chris Adcock and participants in the Workshop “Socially Responsible Investing and Financial Performance”, as well as participants in the EBEN Research Conference 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cortez, M.C., Silva, F. & Areal, N. The Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds. J Bus Ethics 87, 573–588 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9959-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9959-x