Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Keeping Ethical Investment Ethical: Regulatory Issues for Investing for Sustainability

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Regulation must target the financial sector, which often funds and profits from environmentally unsustainable development. In an era of global financial markets, the financial sector has a crucial impact on the state of the environment. The long-standing movement for ethically and socially responsible investment (SRI) has recently begun to advocate environmental standards for financiers. While this movement is gaining more adherents, it has increasingly justified responsible financing as a path to be prosperous, rather than virtuous. This trend partly owes to how financial institutions view their legal responsibilities. The business case motivations that now predominantly drive SRI are not sufficient to make the financial sector a means to sustainable development. Some modest legal reforms to improve the quality and extent of SRI have yet to make a tangible difference. A more ambitious strategy to promote SRI for environmental sustainability is possible, based on reforming the fiduciary duties of financial institutions. Such duties, tied to concrete performance standards, could make financiers invest in more ethically responsible ways. Other collateral reforms to financial markets, including improved corporate environmental reporting, are required to promote sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angel, J. and P. Rivoli.: 1997, “Does Ethical Investing Impose a Cost Upon the Firm? A Theoretical Perspective”, Journal of Investing 6(4), 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BankTrack: 2004, Principles, Profit or Just PR? (BankTrack, Nijmegen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. and S. Morse: 2008, Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable (Earthscan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birsch, D. and J. Fielder: 1994, The Ford Pinto Case: A Study in Applied Ethics, Business, and Technology (State University of New York Press, Albany).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, H., J.A. Brill, and C. Feingenbaum: 1999, Investing with Your Values: Making Money and Making a Difference (Bloomberg Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F.: 1996, The Web of Life. A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems (Anchor Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.: 1992 Allocation, Distribution and Scale: Towards an Economics that is Efficient, Just and Sustainable. Ecological Economics 6, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.: 1997, Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island Press, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., J. Lukomnik and D. Pitt-Watson: 2006, The New Capitalists: How Citizen Investors are Reshaping the Corporate Agenda (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Guercio, D., J. Hawkins 1999 The Motivation and Impact of Pension Fund Activism. Journal of Financial Economics 52, 293–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B. and G. Sessions: 2001, Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered (Gibbs Smith, Layton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering, D., et al.: 2002, Tomorrow’s Markets - Global Trends and their Implications for Business (World Resources Institute, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. Preston: 1995, “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications”, The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durning, A.: 1992, Guardians of the Land: Indigenous Peoples and the Health of the Earth (Worldwatch Institute, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D.: 1998, The Link Between Environmental and Financial Performance (Earthscan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, R.: 1991, “The Golden Fleece? Ethical Investment and Fiduciary Law”, Trust Law International 5(4), 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R.: 2005, “The Moral Power of the World Conservation Movement to Engage Economic Globalization”, The George Wright Forum 22(3): 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurosif: 2006, Socially Responsible Investment among European Institutional Investors (Eurosif, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair Pensions: 2006, UK Pension Scheme Transparency on Social, Environmental and Ethical Issues (Fair Pensions, London),

    Google Scholar 

  • French, H.: 1998, Investing in the Future: Harnessing Private Capital Flows for Environmentally Sustainable Development (Worldwatch Institute, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer: 2005, A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment (UNEPFI, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S. L. and L. T. Starks: 1998, ‹A Survey of Shareholder Activism: Motivation and Empirical Evidence’, Contemporary Finance Digest, Autumn, 2, 10–34

  • Gilson, R. and R. Kraakman: 1991 Reinventing the Outside Director: An Agenda for Institutional Investors. Stanford Law Review 43, 863–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2005, Financial Services Sector Supplement: Environmental Performance Pilot Version 1.0 (GRI, Amsterdam)

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, T.: 2002, The City: Inside the Great Expectation Machine (Financial Times and Prentice Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (GAO): 2004, Environmental Disclosure: SEC Should Explore Ways to Improve Tracking and Transparency of Information (GAO, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Owen D, Adams C (eds) (1996) Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice Hall International, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribben, C. and M. Gitsham: 2006, Will UK Pension Funds Become More Responsible: A Survey of Trustees (UK Social Investment Forum, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Handl, G.: 2001, Multilateral Development Banking: Environmental Principles and Concepts Reflecting General International Law and Public Policy (Kluwer Law, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardenbrook, A. 2007 The Equator Principles: The Private Financial Sector’s Attempt at Environmental Responsibility. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 40, 197–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harte, G., L. Lewis and D. Owen: 1991, “Ethical Investment and the Corporate Reporting Function”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12(3), 227–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P.: 2004, Socially Responsible Investing (Natural Capital Institute, Sausalito),

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, J., and A. Williams: 2000, The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, S., A. Vina, and J. Sohn: 2007, Development without Conflict: The Business Case for Community Consent (World Resources Institute, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D.: 2007, ‹Public Pensions and the Promise of Shareholder Activism for the Next Frontier of Corporate Governance: Sustainable Economic Development’, Working Paper No. 1080 (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor)

  • Hudson, A.: 1999, Principles of Equity and Trusts (Cavendish, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, M. O.: 1992, ‹Socially Responsible Investing: Doing Good Versus Doing Well in an Inefficient Market’, American University Law Review 42, 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.: 2000, A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeucken, M,: 2001, Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet (Earthscan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble J., S. Topiol and S. Berkeley 2003 Using Indicators to Measure Sustainability Performance at a Corporate and Project Level. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3): 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG: 2005, ‹International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005’ (KPMG, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Labatt, S. and R. White: 2002, Environmental Finance: A Guide to Environmental Risk Assessment and Financial Products (John Wiley and Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, J.: 2005 Questioning the Trust Law Duty of Loyalty: Sole Interest or Best Interest?. Yale Law Journal 114, 929–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light A, Rolston III H (eds) (2002). Environmental Ethics: An Anthology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstreth, B.: 1986, Modern Investment Management and the Prudent Man Rule (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1995 Social Systems (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C.: 1998, “The Choice of Criteria in Ethical Investment”, Business Ethics 7(2): 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makin, K.: 2007, ‹High-Stakes Battle Looms over Oil-Sands Pollution’, Globe and Mail (August 15), A1

  • McBeth, A.: 2004, A Look at Corporate Code of Conduct Legislation. Common Law World Review 33: 222–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeachie, S., M. Kiernan and E. Kirzner: 2005, Finance and the Environment in North America: The State of Play of the Integration of Environmental Issues into Financial Research (Environment Canada, Ottawa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer Investment Consulting: 2005, A Climate for Change – A Trustee’s Guide to Understanding and Addressing Climate Risk (Mercer Investment Consulting, Toronto)

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board (MEAB): 2005, ‹Living Beyond Our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-Being’, Statement from the Board (MEAB)

  • Myners, P.: 2001, Institutional Investment in the United Kingdom: A Review (HM Treasury, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Netwerk Vlaanderen: 2007, ‹Belgium Bans Investments in Cluster Munitions’, Press Release, 2 March

  • Norton, J.: 1995, ‹Lender Liability in the United States’, in R. Cranston (ed.), Banks, Liability and Risk (Lloyds of London Press, London), p. 358

  • Palmer, et al.: 2005. Socially Responsible Investment: A Guide for Pension Schemes and Charities (Haven Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of Ireland, Select Committee on Finance and the Public Service: 2006, ‹Parliamentary Debates’, 23 February, 44

  • Quarter, J., L. Mook, and B. Richmond: 2003, What Counts: Social Accounting for Nonprofits and Cooperatives (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R.B.: Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life (Borzoi Books, New York, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B.J.: 2002, Environmental Regulation through Financial Organisations (Kluwer Law, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. J.: 2007a, ‹Financing Sustainability: The New Transnational Governance of Socially Responsible Investment’, in O. K. Fauchald (ed.), Yearbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, New York), p. 73

  • Richardson, B.J.: 2007b, Do the Fiduciary Duties of Pension Funds Hinder Socially Responsible Investment?. Banking and Finance Law Review 22(2), 145–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B.J.: 2008, Socially Responsible Investment Law: Regulating the Unseen Polluters (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarra, J.: 2003, The Corporation as Symphony: Are Shareholders First Violin or Second Fiddle?. UBC Law Review 36, 403–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Schönbein, O. and A. Braunschweig: 2000, EPI-Finance 2000: Environmental Performance Indicators for the Financial Industry (E2 Management Consulting, Zurich)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtz D, Willott E (eds) (2002) Environmental Ethics: What Really Matters. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B.: 2005 What Drives Socially Responsible Investment? The Case of the Netherlands. Sustainable Development 13, 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, J.C.: 1981 Towards a Unified Concept of Fiduciary Relationships. Law Quarterly Review 97, 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Investment Forum (SIF): 2008, 2007 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States (SIF, Washington DC),

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskolne C (eds) (2007) Sustaining Life on Earth. Lexington Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R.: 2001, ‹Ethical Investment: Whose Ethics, Which Investment?’, Business Ethics: A European Review 10, 194–205

  • Stone, C.: 1987, Earth and Other Ethics (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarp, F.: 2000, Foreign Aid and Development: Lessons Learned and Directions for the Future (Routledge, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.: 1998, An Ecological Approach to International Law: Responding to Challenges of Climate Change (Routledge, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W.: 2001 The Green Nexus: Financiers and Sustainable Development. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 13, 899–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triolo, P., M. Palmer, and S. Waygood: 2000, A Capital Solution: Faith, Finance and Concern for a Living Planet (Pilkington Press, London),

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyer, T., W. Slocombe, and R. Boisture: 1985 Divestment of South Africa Investments: The Legal Implications for Foundations, Other Charitable Institutions, and Pension Funds. Georgetown law Journal 74, 127–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trucost: 2007, Carbon Counts 2007: The Carbon Footprint Ranking of UK Investment (Trucost, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • UK, Office for National Statistics (ONS): 2007, Share Ownership: A Report on Ownership of UK Shares as at 31st December 2006 (ONS, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Program Finance Initiative (UNEPFI): 2004a. The Materiality of Social, Environmental and Corporate Governance Issues in Equity Pricing (UNEPFI, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEPFI: 2004b. Generation Lost: Young Financial Analysts and Environmental, Social and Governance Issues. Executive Summary (UNEPFI, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEPFI: 2006, Show Me the Money: Linking Environmental, Social and Governance Issues to Company Value (UNEPFI, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEPFI: 2007, Responsible Investment in Focus: How Leading Public Pension Funds are Meeting the Challenge (UNEPFI, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEPFI and Mercer: 2007, Demystifying Responsible Investment Performance: A Review of Key Academic and Broker Research on ESG Factors (UNEPFI, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Unerman, J., J. Bebbington and B. O’Dwyer (eds): 2007, Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (Routledge, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Concerned Scientists: 1992, ‹World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity’, http://www.ucsusa.org/ucs/about/1992-world-scientists-warning-to-humanity.html

  • United Nations Economic and Social Council: 2002, Implementing Agenda 21: Report of the Secretary-General, E/CN.17/PC.2/7

  • Wackernagel, M. and W. Rees: 1996, Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth (New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, British Columbia).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. Jr.: 1967, ‹The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis’, Science 155, 1203–1207

  • Williams, C. and J. Conley: 2007, “Triumph or Tragedy: The Curious Path of Corporate Disclosure Reform in the UK”, William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 31(2), 317–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (WEF): 2005, Mainstreaming Responsible Investment (WEF, Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto, Canada

    Benjamin J. Richardson

Authors
  1. Benjamin J. Richardson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin J. Richardson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, B.J. Keeping Ethical Investment Ethical: Regulatory Issues for Investing for Sustainability. J Bus Ethics 87, 555–572 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9958-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9958-y

Keywords

search

Navigation