Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competitive Bluffing: An Examination of a Common Practice and its Relationship with Performance

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bluffing, a common and consequential form of competitive behavior, has been comparably ignored in the management literature, even though misleading one’s rivals is suggested to be an advantageous skill in a multifaceted and highly competitive environment. To address this deficiency and advance scholarship on competitive dynamics, our study investigates the moral reasoning behind competitive bluffing and, using a simulated market-entry game, examines the performance effects of bluffing. Findings suggest that decision makers’ views on the ethicality of bluffing competitors differ from their beliefs on the ethicality of misleading other organizational stakeholders. Analysis also indicates that decision makers who view competitor bluffing as more ethical (less unethical) are more willing to engage in competitive bluffing. Finally, while bluffing is often thought to be an effective business practice, results show that in the context of repeated interaction, bluffing is not conducive to high levels of performance and, in fact, can have undesirable consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allhoff, F. (2003). ‘Business bluffing reconsidered’. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 283–289. doi:10.1023/A:1024103612716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anton, R.J. (1990). ‘Drawing the line: An exploratory test of ethical behavior in negotiations’. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 265–280. doi:10.1108/eb022683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1979). ‘Coping with deception’. In R. Axelrod (ed.), Applied Game Theory. Physica-Verlag, Germany, pp. 390–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basdeo, D.K., Smith, K.G., Grimm, C.M., Rindova, V·P., & Derfus, P.J. (2006). ‘The impact of market actions on firm reputation’. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1205–1219. doi:10.1002/smj.556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J.A.C., & Korn, H.J. (1996). ‘Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry’. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 255–291. doi:10.2307/256781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumhart, R. C.: 1961, ‘How Ethical are Businessmen’, Harvard Business Review, July–Aug, 6

  • Baumol, W. J. 1991, Perfect Markets and Easy Virtue: Business Ethics and the Invisible Hand. Blackwell Publishing, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayus, B. L., Jain, S., & Rao, A. G. (2001). ‘Truth or consequences: An analysis of vaporware and new product announcements. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 3–13. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.3.18834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, J. (1985). ‘Bluffing: Its demise as a subject into itself’. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 191–196. doi:10.1007/BF00705618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). ‘Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior’. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benabou, R. and G. Laroque: 1992, ‘Using Privileged Information to Manipulate Markets: Insiders, Gurus, and Credibility’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 921–958. doi:10.2307/2118369

  • Bond, C·F., & DePaulo, B.M. (2006). ‘Accuracy of deception judgments’. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. 1985. Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict. Yale University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A.M., & Nalebuff, B.J. 1996, Co-opetition. Doubleday, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S·N., & Molander, E.A. (1977). Is the ethics of business changing? Harvard Business Review, 55, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., & Ho, T.H. (1999). ‘Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games’. Econometrica, 67, 827–874. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A.Z. (1968). Is business bluffing ethical? Harvard Business Review, 46, 143-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. (1993). ‘Second thoughts about bluffing’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3, 317–341. doi:10.2307/3857282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S.M., & Ruefli, T.W. (2006). ‘Intra-industry reputation dynamics under a resource-based framework: Assessing the durability factor’. Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 3–25. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., & Miller, D. (1994). ‘Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valance framework’. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 85–102. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. J. and K. Strucker: 1997, ‘Multinational Management and Multimarket Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Development of Global Competition’, Academy of Management Proceedings 2–6

  • D’Aveni, R.A. 1994, Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering. Free Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R.A. 1995, Hypercompetitive Rivalries: Competing in Highly Dynamic Environments. Free Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. (2005). How strong are the ethical preferences of senior business executives? Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 69–80. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-3238-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L.M. (1997). ‘Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession’. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1143–1152. doi:10.1023/A:1005721916646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W·W. (1983). ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J., & Hopkins, E. (2005). ‘Learning, information, and sorting in market entry games: Theory and evidence’. Games and Economic Behavior, 51, 31–62. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., T. S. Robertson and T. Rymon: 1996, ‘Market Signaling and Competitive Bluffing: An Empirical Study’, Marketing Science Institute, Report No. 96-102, 3–17

  • Farrell, J., & Rabin, M. (1996). ‘Cheap talk’. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, W.J., Smith, K.G., & Grimm, C. (1999). ‘The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers’. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 372–388. doi:10.2307/257009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, B.L., & May, D.R. (2000). ‘Environmental ethical decision making in the U.S. metal-finishing industry’. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 642–662. doi:10.2307/1556359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P., (1977). ‘Euthanasia’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6, 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S.L., & Hui, C. (2005). ‘How job pressures and extrinsic rewards affect lying behavior’. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 287–300. doi:10.1108/eb022933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guth, W. 1993, ‘Ethics in business – a European approach’. In P. M. Minus (ed.), The Ethics of Business in a Global Economy. Kluwer Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, O·P., & Langvardt, A.W. (1994). ‘The interface between competitive market signaling and antitrust law’. Journal of Marketing, 58, 81–97. doi:10.2307/1252312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1991). ‘Corporate control and the politics of finance’. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 4(2), 13–33. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.1991.tb00603.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M., & Ryan, L.V. (1997). ‘The link between ethical judgment and action in organizations: A moral approbation approach’. Organization Science, 8, 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. 1982, Judgment Under Certainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D.J., Snow, C·C., & Hoover, V.L. (2004). ‘Research on competitive dynamics: Recent accomplishments and future challenges’. Journal of Management, 30, 779–804. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Langinier, C. (2005). ‘Using patents to mislead rivals’. The Canadian Journal of Economics. Revue Canadienne d’Economique, 38, 520–545. doi:10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00291.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Smith, K.G., Grimm, C.M., & Schomburg, A. (2000). ‘Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation’. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 23–30. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097–0266(200001)21:1<23::AID-SMJ64>3.0.CO;2-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R.J. 1983, ‘Lying and deception: A behavioral model’. In M.H. Bazerman and R.J. Lewicki (eds.), Negotiation in Organizations. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R.J., & Robinson, R.J. (1998). ‘Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study’. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 665–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R.J., & Stark, N. (1996). ‘What is ethically appropriate in negotiations: An empirical examination of bargaining’. Social Justice Research, 9, 69–95. doi:10.1007/BF02197657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linchfield Insurance Group: 2005, ‘CEO Best Practices Forum Final Report: Learning from Proven and Successful Technology Leaders’, www.ct.org/pdf_files_forweb/FAST50-v4-forweb.pdf

  • Makadok, R. (1998). Can first-mover and early-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strategic Management Journal, 19, 683–696. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199807)19:7<683::AID-SMJ965>3.0.CO;2-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. 1956, Organizations. Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R.G., Chen, M.J., & MacMillan, I·C. (1998). ‘Multimarket maneuvering in uncertain spheres of influence: Resource diversion strategies’. Academy of Management Review, 23, 724–740. doi:10.2307/259059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, M.D. 1996, Evolutionary Innovations. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, M. 1996. Sun Tzu and the Art of Business: Six Strategic Principles for Managers. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milewicz, J. and P. Herbig: 1997, ‘A Quantitative Analysis of the Relative Efficiency Between Overt and Covert Market Signals’, Journal of Marketing: Theory and Practice, Fall, 45–57

  • Moore, M.C. (1992). ‘Signals and choices in a competitive interaction: The role of moves and messages’. Management Science, 38, 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.C., Morgan, R.M., & Moore, M.J. (2001). ‘Only the illusion of possible collusion? Cheap talk and similar goals: Some experimental evidence’. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20, 27–37. doi:10.1509/jppm.20.1.27.17282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K., & Carnevale, P. (1997). ‘A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: Misrepresentation of a common-value issue’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 504–515. doi:10.1177/0146167297235006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H·S., Levine, T.R., McCornack, S.A., Morrison, K., & Ferrara, M. (2002). ‘How people really detect lies’. Communication Monographs, 69, 144–157. doi:10.1080/714041710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B. (2001). ‘Ethical beliefs of business professionals: A study of gender, age and external factors’. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 225–232. doi:10.1023/A:1010744927551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1980, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, J., & Stewart, D.W. (2001). ‘Signaling strategies in competitive interaction: Building reputations and hiding the truth. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 62–72. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.62.18826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., Seale, D.A., & Winter, E. (2000). ‘An experimental study of coordination and learning in iterated two-market entry games’. Economic Theory, 16, 661–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., Seale, D.A., & Winter, E. (2002). ‘Coordination and learning behavior in large groups with asymmetric players’. Games and Economic Behavior, 39, 111–137. doi:10.1006/game.2001.0885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T.S., Eliashberg, J., & Rymon, T. (1995). ‘New product announcement signals and incumbent reactions’. Journal of Marketing, 59, 1–15. doi:10.2307/1252115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosmarin, R: 2007, ‘Imaginary Innovations: CES Often Shows off “Vaporware” – Would be Gadgets that Never Happen’, www.forbes.com/2007/01/04/vaporware-ces-gadgets-tech-media-cx_rr_0105vaporware.html

  • Ross, W., & Robertson, D. (2000). ‘Lying: The impact of decision context’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 409–440. doi:10.2307/3857884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M., & Ross, D. 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, M.E., Ordonez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). ‘Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior’. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 422–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, D., & Sundali, J. 1999, ‘Cheap talk in a large group coordinated game’. In D. Budescu, I. Erev, & R. Zwick (eds.), Games and Human Behavior: Essays in Honor of Amnon Rapoport. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., New Jersey, pp. 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R., & Guth, W. 1982, ‘Equilibrium point selection in a class of market entry games’. In M. Diestler, E. Furst, and G. Schwadiauer (eds.), Games, Economic Dynamics, and Time Series Analysis. Physica-Verlag, Germany, pp. 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serwinek, P. (1992). ‘Demographic and related differences in ethical views among small businesses’. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 555–566. doi:10.1007/BF00881448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L., & Bies, R. J.. (1994). ‘Threats, Bluffs, and Disclaimers in Negotiations’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 14–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soutar, G., McNeil, M.M., & Molster, C. (1994). ‘The impact of the work environment on ethical decision making: Some Australian evidence’. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 327–339. doi:10.1007/BF00871761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundali, J.A., Rapoport, A., & Seale, D.A. (1995). ‘Coordination in market entry games with symmetric players’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 203–218. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundali, J.A., & Seale, D.A. (2004). ‘The value of cheap-talk and costly signals in coordinating market entry decisions’. The Journal of Business Strategy, 21, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A.E. (1998). ‘Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation’. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 330–339. doi:10.2307/256911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G.P., & Soldow, G.F. (1988). ‘A rules-based approach to competitive interaction’. Journal of Marketing, 52, 63–74. doi:10.2307/1251265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, C·H., & Pillutla, M.M. (1998). ‘Negotiating in the United States and Hong Kong’. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 711–727. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Huyck, J.B., Battalio, R.C., & Beil, R.O. (1990). ‘Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure’. The American Economic Review, 80, 234–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S.J., Dickerson, E.B., & Festervand, T.A. (2000). ‘Ethical problems, conflicts and beliefs of small business professionals’. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 15–24. doi:10.1023/A:1006217129077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S.L., & Cochran, P.L. (1985). ‘The evolution of the corporate social performance model’. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–769. doi:10.2307/258044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J.D., & Fredrickson, J.W. (2001). ‘Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy’. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1113–1138. doi:10.1002/smj.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., Smith, K.G., Grimm, C.M., & Simon, D. (2000). ‘Multimarket contact and resource dissimilarity: A competitive dynamics perspective’. Journal of Management, 26, 1217–1237. doi:10.1177/014920630002600608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A. (1994). ‘Unethical practices in competitive analysis: Patterns, causes and effects’. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 53–62. doi:10.1007/BF00877155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.

    Rebecca M. Guidice, G. Stoney Alder & Steven E. Phelan

Authors
  1. Rebecca M. Guidice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Stoney Alder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven E. Phelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca M. Guidice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guidice, R.M., Alder, G.S. & Phelan, S.E. Competitive Bluffing: An Examination of a Common Practice and its Relationship with Performance. J Bus Ethics 87, 535–553 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9957-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9957-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation