Skip to main content

The Business Ethics of Short Selling and Naked Short Selling

Journal of Business Ethics volume 85, pages 239–249 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

The controversy over short selling has continued unabated from the introduction of modern equity trading in Amsterdam in 1610 to the present day. Nevertheless, the business ethics literature has not really addressed short selling. Short sellers not only profit from the misery of others, they also create it through their selling activities. However, they also provide a socially useful service by making prices better reflect true values, protecting other investors from purchasing overpriced securities. Short sellers can also help to provide liquidity in the markets. Recently, there has been a hue and cry against so called “naked” short selling, which involves not delivering the shares that have been sold. This gives manipulators a tool for depressing stock prices and deprives purchasers of voting rights and potential stock lending revenue. Naked short selling creates ethical issues for short sellers, buyers, brokers, market makers, and regulators. Is it ethical to exploit a legal loophole that permits sellers to sell stock and delay delivering shares indefinitely?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Borna, S. and J. Lowry, 1987, Gambling and Speculation, Journal of Business Ethics 6 (3), 219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bris, A., W. N. Goetzmann and N. Zhu: 2003a, ‘Short-Sales in Global Perspective’. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 04-01. http://ssrn.com/abstract=486264. Accessed Dec 2003

  • Bris, A., W. N. Goetzmann and N. Zhu: 2003b, ‘Efficiency and the Bear: Short Sales and Markets Around the World’. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 02-45; EFA 2003 Annual Conference; AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings; 14th Annual Conference on Financial Economics & Accounting. http://ssrn.com/abstract=357800. Accessed Jan 2003

  • Burkart, M. C. and S. Lee: 2007, ‘The One Share – One Vote Debate: A Theoretical Perspective’. ECGI – Finance Working Paper No. 176/2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=987486. Accessed May 2007

  • Christoffersen, S. K., C. C. Geczy, D. K. Musto and A. V. Reed: 2006, ‘Vote Trading and Information Aggregation’. AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=686026. Accessed 26 June 2006

  • Coyne, Michael P., and Janice M. Traflet, 2008, Ethical Issues Related to the Mass Marketing of Securities, Journal of Business Ethics 78(1–2), 193–198, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9319-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC): 2005, ‘Naked Short Selling and the Stock Borrow Program’, @DTCC. http://www.dtcc.com/news/newsletters/dtcc/2005/mar/naked_short_selling.php. Accessed Mar 2005

  • Evans, R. B., C. C. Geczy, D. K. Musto and A. V. Reed: 2008, ‘Failure is an Option: Impediments to Short-Selling and Options Prices’, Review of Financial Studies. RFS Advance. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm083. Accessed 5 Jan 2008

  • Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA): 2007, ‘NASD Manual, Rule 2310. Recommendations to Customers (Suitability)’, http://finra.complinet.com/finra/display/display.html?rbid=1189&record_id=1159000499&element_id=1159000500&highlight=suitability#r1159000499

  • Irvine, William J., 2002, Ill-wind Investing: The Ethics of Wishing. Journal of Business Ethics 35. 57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, J. Edward, 1932, Short Selling. Harper and Brothers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, L.: 2006, ‘Naked Horror’, Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/2006/08/25/naked-shorts-global-links-cx_lm_0825naked.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2006

  • Naughton, Shahnaz and Tony Naughton, 2000, Religion, ethics and stock trading: The case of an Islamic equities market, Journal of Business Ethics 23, 145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanell, K.: 2007, ‘How Borrowed Shares Swing Company Votes: SEC and Others Fear Hedge-Fund Strategy May Subvert Elections,’ Wall Street Journal, January 26, p. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Economic Analysis: 2007, ‘Economic Analysis of the Short Sale Price Restrictions under the Regulation SHO Pilot, SEC Office of Economic Analysis’, www.sec.gov/news/studies/2007/regshopilot020607.pdf

  • Silber, W. L.: 2007, When Washington Shut Down Wall Street (Princeton University Press, Princeton), ISBN 978-0691127477

  • Vodia Group: 2006, Shaking Up Prime Brokerage: Unbundling Securities Lending, Financing and Derivatives Transactions (Vodia Group, Concord, MA), http://www.vodiagroup.com/site/press.php.

  • White, B.: 2006, ‘Hedge Fund Lawsuit Stopped Dirty Tricks, Says Insurer’, Financial Times, U.S. Edition, 3 November, p. 1

  • Zweig, J.: 1991, ‘Wall Street Words’, Friends of Financial History 44, Fall 32–33

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20057, U.S.A.

    James J. Angel & Douglas M. McCabe

Authors
  1. James J. Angel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas M. McCabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James J. Angel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angel, J.J., McCabe, D.M. The Business Ethics of Short Selling and Naked Short Selling. J Bus Ethics 85, 239–249 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9943-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9943-5

Keywords

  • executive compensation
  • financial ethics
  • stock market
  • short selling
  • naked short selling