Skip to main content
Log in

Does Milton Friedman Support a Vigorous Business Ethics?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the level of obligation called for by Milton Friedman’s classic essay “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits.” Several scholars have argued that Friedman asserts that businesses have no or minimal social duties beyond compliance with the law. This paper argues that this reading of Friedman does not give adequate weight to some claims that he makes and to their logical extensions. Throughout his article, Friedman emphasizes the values of freedom, respect for law, and duty. The principle that a business professional should not infringe upon the liberty of other members of society can be used by business ethicists to ground a vigorous line of ethical analysis. Any practice, which has a negative externality that requires another party to take a significant loss without consent or compensation, can be seen as unethical. With Friedman’s framework, we can see how ethics can be seen as arising from the nature of business practice itself. Business involves an ethics in which we consider, work with, and respect strangers who are outside of traditional in-groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry, V. and W. Shaw: 2001, Moral Issues in Business (Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, CA)

  • Beauchamp, T. 2004. Case Studies in Business, Society, and Ethics, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R., Petrova, P., & Goldstein, N. (2004). The Hidden Costs of Organizational Dishonesty. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45, 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius. 1979. The Analects, Penguin Books, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 33, 122–125

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. 1980. “Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C. (1991). Friedman Fallacies. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 907–914. doi:10.1007/BF00383796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H. S. and F. Rassekh: 2000, ‹Smith, Friedman, and Self-Interest in Ethical Society’, Business Ethics Quarterly 10, 659–674. doi:10.2307/3857897

  • Kant, I.: 1785 [1985], Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (Macmillan Publishing Company, New York)

  • Kulik, B., M. O’Fallon and M. Salimath: 2006, Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute 2006 Annual Meeting, Submission # 2781

  • Lueck, S.: 2008, ‹After 12-Year Quest, Domenici’s Mental-Health Bill Succeeds’, Wall Street Journal, October 4–5, A2

  • McAleer, S. (2003). Friedman’s stockholder theory of corporate moral responsibility. Teaching Business Ethics, 7, 437–451. doi:10.1023/B:TEBE.0000005711.70399.51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, G. and A. Zimmerman: 2008, ‹Wal-Mart Reaches Out to Candidates, Congress; Retailer Promises to Be a “Partner” on Social Issues’, Wall Street Journal, June 7–8, A6

  • Mill, J. S.: 1859 [2002], On Liberty (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY)

  • Olsson, K.: 2003, ‹Up Against Wal-Mart’, Mother Jones, March/April, pp. 54–59

  • Silver, D. (2005). Corporate Codes of Conduct and the Value of Autonomy. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 3–8. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3399-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A.: 2000, ‹The Perils of Doing the Right Thing’, Across the Board, October 14–19

  • Stanwick, P., & Standwick, S. 2009. Understanding Business Ethics, Pearson Prentic Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the many people who have offered helpful suggestions on this work as I developed it. Karen Moustafa, Bernd Buldt, David Dilts, Brian Kulik, Carolyn Stump, Jennifer Caseldine-Bracht, Cory Pickens, Cathy Dunmire and a session at the 2007 Midwest DSI meeting in Chicago all offered helpful comments on earlier drafts of my paper. Several sections of business students taking a course titled Social, Legal & Ethical Implications of Business Decisions at Indiana— Purdue University provided many good conversations on Friedman and interpretations of him as we discussed him for class.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Cosans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cosans, C. Does Milton Friedman Support a Vigorous Business Ethics?. J Bus Ethics 87, 391–399 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9927-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9927-5

Keywords

Navigation