Attachment Styles and Ethical Behavior: Their Relationship and Significance in the Marketplace
- 403 Downloads
This paper compares the ethical standards reported by consumers and managers with different attachment styles (secure, preoccupied, fearful, or dismissing). We conducted two studies of consumer ethical beliefs and a third managerial survey. In Study 1, we used a questionnaire that we constructed, and in Study 2, we used the Muncy–Vitell Consumer Ethics Scale. The results in both the studies were consistent and showed that men reported a greater indifference to ethical transgressions than women. Based on the two studies, the results indicate that␣among male consumers, the dismissing participants reported the greatest overall indifference to ethical transgressions and the secure participants expressed the most ethical beliefs. The two intermediate groups did not differ significantly from each other. In Study 1, none of the women consumers reported a dismissing attachment style. Women with a secure style reported more ethical beliefs than those in the other two groups. However, the sample in Study 2 included dismissing women. The dismissing women reported the greatest overall indifference to ethical transgressions and the secure women expressed the most ethical beliefs. The illegal profit subscale described the most severe ethical transgressions, and for both men and women, the secure participants were less apt than the other participants to report a willingness to transgress. In Study 3, the Newstrom and Ruch (1975, MSU Business Topics, Winter, 31) Questionnaire was administered to 227 managers. All four attachment patterns were represented among the participants of both genders. In all cases, the participants with a dismissing attachment style showed the greatest readiness to transgress.
Keywordsattachment styles consumer ethics managerial ethics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was made possible by a grant from the American Association of University Women Educational Foundation that was awarded to the first author to support her postdoctoral work at Stanford University. The authors wish to thank Bulent Turan, Lynne Henderson, Daniel Leising, Kelly Wilson, and Pavel Zolotsev for providing helpful discussions and suggestions. We also wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
- Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S.(1978). Patterns of Attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
- Albanese, P.J. (1990). ‹Personality, consumer behavior and marketing research: A new theoretical and empirical approach’, in E. C. Hirschman (Ed.), Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 4 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 1–49Google Scholar
- Belsky, J., & Cassidy, J.(1994). Attachment : Theory and evidence. In M. Rutter & D. Hay (Eds.), Development through life: A handbook for clinicians (pp. 372–402). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). New York: BasicGoogle Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss. Vol 2: Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
- Hartshorne, H., & May, A.(1928). Studies in the nature of character, Vol. 1. Studies in Deceit. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
- Hunt, S.D., & Vitell, S.J.(1993). The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision. In: Craig, S. N., John, A. Q. (eds.), Ethics in Marketing. Irwin Inc., Homewood IL, pp 775–784Google Scholar
- Marks, L. J. and M. A. Mayo: 1991, ‹An Empirical Test of a Model of Consumer Ethical Dilemmas’, in R. H. Holman and M. R. Solomons (eds.), Advances of Consumer Research (Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI), pp. 720–728Google Scholar
- Newstrom, J.W., W.A. Ruch (1975). “Marketing Ethics of Management and the Management of Ethics”, MSU Business Topics, Winter, 31Google Scholar
- Shaver, P.R., & Hazan, C.(1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. In D. Perlman & W. Jones (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 29–70). London, England: KingsleyGoogle Scholar