Skip to main content
Log in

Preserving Employee Dignity During the Termination Interview: An Empirical Examination

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the ongoing need for managers to fire employees and the wide prevalence of downsizing and layoffs, little research has examined how the conduct of termination interviews affects employee reactions. The current research was designed to explore reactions to several commonly used termination interview practices. Two scenario-based experiments examined the effectiveness of having a third party (an HR manager or a security guard) present, mentioning the employee’s positive characteristics and contributions, and using alone, discrete escort, or public escort modes of exit from the interview. Perceptions of being treated with respect and empathy, levels of anger, and the likelihood of complaining to others and taking legal action were assessed. Support for the effectiveness of specific termination interview practices was mixed. Specifically, in Experiment 1, third party presence was viewed as demonstrating a lack of respect, whereas mentioning positive characteristics was generally viewed favorably. Experiment 2 showed the favorable effects of mentioning positive characteristics were eroded by a security guard escort from the interview, and actually reversed and became negative when that escort was public in nature. A public escort also produced the highest levels of anger. These results suggest that multiple aspects of the termination interview process should be considered carefully when developing managerial policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold, D, and Bowie, N.: 2007, ‹Respect for workers in global supply chains: advancing the debate over sweatshops’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17 (1): 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B.: 1983, The Logic and Limits of Trust. Rutgers University Press, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, R.: 2000, ‹Termination with Dignity’, Business Horizons, September–October

  • Bitner, M. 1990 ‹Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses’. Journal of Marketing, 54: 69–82. doi:10.2307/1251871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. 2003, Ethics and the Conduct of Business. Prentice Hall, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, S. and S. Kasl: 1977, Termination: The Consequences of Job Loss, Report # 76-1261 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington D.C.)

  • Deadrick, D. and P. Gibson: 2007, ‹An Examination of the Research-Practice Gap in HR: Comparing topics of interest to HR academics and HR professionals’. Human Resource Management Review, 17: 131–139. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. and Karau, S. 1991, ‹Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis’. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 60: 685–710. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. and V. Steffen: 1986, ‹Gender and Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature’, Psychological Bulletin 100(3), 309–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, S. and Taylor, S. 1984, Social Cognition. Random House, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilland, S. and Schepers, D. 2003, ‹Why we do the things we do: a discussion and analysis of determinants of just treatment in layoff implementation decisions’. Human Resource Management Review, 13(1): 59–84p. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00099-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D.: 1998, ‹What makes a leader?’. Harvard Business Review, 82(1): 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J.: 1990, ‹Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow’. Journal of Management, 16(2): 249–372. doi:10.1177/014920639001600208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A.: 1980, ‹The Totalitarian Ego: Fabrication and Revision of Personal History’, American Psychologist 35, 603–618

  • Hepworth, S.: 1980, ‹Moderating factors of the psychological impact of unemployment’. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesseph, S.: 1989, ‹Employee termination: some dos and don’ts’. Personnel, 66(2): 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., B. Fredrickson, C. Schreiber and D. Redelmeier: 1993, ‹When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End’, Psychological Science 4, 401–405. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x

  • Kant, I.: 1785, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Gregor, M. (1997) in Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK)

  • Karl, K. and Hancock, B.: 1999, ‹Expert advice on employment termination practices: How expert is it?’. Public Personnel Management, 28(1): 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, N., B. Greiff and D. Hagen: 1990, The Psychological Impact of Job Loss (American Psychiatric Press)

  • Levine, H.: 1992, ‹The view from the board: The state of compensation and benefits today’. Compensation and Benefits Review, 24(2): 24–29. doi:10.1177/088636879202400206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H.: 1962. Men, Management, and Mental Health. Harvard University Press, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. and Weigert, A.: 1985, ‹Trust as a social reality’. Social Forces, 63: 967–985. doi:10.2307/2578601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loviscky, G., Trevino, L., and Jacobs, R.: 2007, ‹Assessing managers’ ethical decision-making: An objective measure of managerial moral judgment.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 73(3): 263–285. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9206-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malos, S., Haynes, P. and Bowal, P.: 2003, ‹A contingency approach to the employment relationship: Form, function, and effectiveness implications.’ Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 15(3): 149–167. doi:10.1023/A:1024765408933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCollough, M., Berry, L. and Yadav, M.: 2000, ‹An empirical investigation of customer service after service failure recovery’, Journal of Service Research, 3: 121–137. doi:10.1177/109467050032002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. and Harvey, R.: 2007, ‹The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4): 335–357. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9174-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.: 2001, ‹The four horsemen of downsizing and the Tower of Babel.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 29: 147–151. doi:10.1023/A:1006411413291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. and Robinson, S.: 1997, ‹When employees feel betrayed: a model of how psychological contract violation develops’, Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 226–256. doi:10.2307/259230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigro, L. and Waugh, W.: 1996, ‹Violence in the American workplace: Challenges to the public employer’, Public Administration Review, 56: 326–332. doi:10.2307/976373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyer, P. and Schaefer, S.: 2000, ‹Layoffs and litigation.’ Journal of Economics, 31 (2): 345–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M.: 1994, ‹ Should we let employees contract away their rights against arbitrary discharge?’, Journal of Business Ethics, 13(4): 233–242. doi:10.1007/BF00871670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem, R. and Rosentein, J.: 2000, ‹Is organization theory obvious to practitioners? A test of one established theory’, Organization Science, 11: 509–524. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.509.15199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinley, K.: 2003, ‹Ten Ways to Prevent Employment Practices Claims After Layoffs’, Fair Employment Practices Guidelines (3/1/2003) 571, 1–2

  • Robinson, S.: 1996, ‹Trust and breach of the psychological contract’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 574–599. doi:10.2307/2393868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. and Morrison, E.: 1995, ‹Organizational citizenship behavior: A psychological contract perspective’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 289–298. doi:10.1002/job.4030160309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D.: 1989, ‹Psychological and implied contract in organizations’, Employees Responsibility and Rights Journal, 2: 121–139. doi:10.1007/BF01384942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S., Giluk, T., and Brown, K.: 2007, ‹The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resources management: Implications for evidence based management’, Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 987–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.: 1965. Organizational Psychology (Prentice Hall, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwieger, D. and Ivancevich, J.: 1987, ‹Executive actions for managing human resources before and after acquisitions’, Academy of Management Executive, 1: 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidebotham, E. 2005, ‹How to use documentation to decrease the likelihood of litigation’. The Psychologist – Manager Journal, 8(2): 131–140. doi:10.1207/s15503461tpmj0802_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulkowicz, K.: 2006, ‹Managing the Pink Slip Blues’, Business Week, (9/25/2006) Issue 4002, 18-18

  • Watson, G. and Sheikh, F.: 2008. ‹Normative self-interest or moral hypocrisy? The importance of context.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3): 259–269. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9348-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, L.: 1988. ‹Handing Out Pink Slips Gracefully’, Business Week, (6/20/88) Issue 3057, 168-168

  • Zucker, L.: 1986, ‹Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structures 1840–1920’ in Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, CT), pp.␣53–111

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew S. Wood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, M.S., Karau, S.J. Preserving Employee Dignity During the Termination Interview: An Empirical Examination. J Bus Ethics 86, 519–534 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9862-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9862-5

Keywords

Navigation