Abstract
This article is the final one in a series of four papers investigating the stakeholder approach to running businesses. It argues that the optimally viable version of that approach is one in which employees have a co-equal status as stakeholders with shareholders (the maximum allowed for under stakeholder theory) while other groupings only have a minimal status as stakeholders and are generally restricted to just customers, suppliers, and lenders. This version is argued for on the grounds that it both overcomes the implementation problems attendant upon having to serve the interests of a range of groupings and is justified in terms of stakeholder membership being confined to those groupings with a claim on the services of a business in virtue of directly contributing to its economic functioning. The ranking of non-shareholder stakeholders in the recommended version and, in particular, the maximal ranking granted to employees is argued to reflect the scale of the various contributions as measured by the degree to which making it exposes those stakeholders to both financial risk and a non-financial “work-related” risk peculiar to employees. It is concluded that although this is the best available version of the stakeholder approach it may not be the best of all possible ways of running a business.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blair M. M.: 1995, Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty First Century. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
Boatright J. R.: 1999, Ethics in Finance. Blackwell, Oxford
Bowie N. E., P. Werhane: 2005, Management Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford
Chryssides G. D., J. H. Kaler: 1993, An Introduction to Business Ethics. Chapman & Hall, London
Evan W. M., R. E. Freeman: 1993, A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In Chryssides G. D., J. H. Kaler, eds An Introduction to Business Ethics. Chapman & Hall, London
Greiling D.: 1997, The Legal Framework: Company and Labour Law. In Reeves, N., H. Kelly-Holmes eds The European Business Environment: Germany. International Thomson Business Press, London
Kaler J.: 2002. Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder Identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1–2), 91–99. doi:10.1023/A:1016336118528
Kaler J.: 2003. Differentiating Stakeholder Theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 71–83. doi:10.1023/A:1024794710899
Kaler J.: 2004. Arriving at an Acceptable Formulation of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics: European Review (Chichester, England), 13(1), 73–79
Kaler J.: 2006. Evaluating Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(3), 249–268. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9089-2
Lamont, J. and C. Favour: 2007, ‹Distributive Justice’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-distributive/. Accessed May 26, 2007
Phillips R.: 2003, Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
John Kaler is a Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Plymouth Business School. He is the co-author of the books An Introduction to Business Ethics and Essentials of Business Ethics, and was co-editor for Teaching Business Ethics, a website hosted by the Institute of Business Ethics. He is an ex-member of the Executive Committee of the European Business Ethics, U.K., and has published on a wide range of business ethics topics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaler, J. An Optimally Viable Version of Stakeholder Theory. J Bus Ethics 86, 297–312 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9848-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9848-3