Advertisement

Purchasing and Marketing of Social and Environmental Sustainability for High-Tech Medical Equipment

  • 713 Accesses

  • 32 Citations

Abstract

As the functional capabilities of high-tech medical products converge, supplying organizations seek new opportunities to differentiate their offerings. Embracing product sustainability-related differentiators provides just such an opportunity. This study examines the challenge organizations face when attempting to understand how customers perceive environmental and social dimensions of sustainability by exploring and defining both dimensions on the basis of a review of extant literature and focus group research with a leading supplier of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning equipment. The study encompasses seven hospitals and one private imaging center in the Netherlands and identifies five social aspects that cover 11 indicators. The authors conduct 22 customer perception interviews with key decision-making stakeholders involved in purchasing MRI scanning equipment. Respondents find environmental and social sustainability dimensions personally relevant but professionally secondary to cost, performance, and ability to use the equipment in their organizations’ physical infrastructure. Finally, incorporating a product’s environmental and social credentials within the marketing of MRI scanning equipment enhances the perception of the product offering in decision-making stakeholders’ minds and provides a means of differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. Amaral, S. P., La Rovere, E. L. 2003. Indicators to Evaluate Environmental, Social, and Economic Sustainability: A Proposal for the Brazilian Oil Industry. Oil & Gas Journal 101(19), 30–35

  2. Beverland, M., Lindgreen, A. 2006. Implementing Market Orientation in Industrial Firms: A Multiple Case Study. Industrial Marketing Management 36(4), 430–442

  3. Cowell, S. J., Wehrmeyer, W., Argust, P. W., Graham, J., Robertson, S. 1999. Sustainability and the Primary Extraction Industries: Theories and Practice. Resources Policy 25(4), 277–286

  4. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550

  5. Fiksel, J., J. McDaniel and D. Spitzley: 1998, ‹Measuring Product Sustainability’, The Journal of Sustainable Product Design (July), 1–15

  6. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, September 13

  7. Funk, K. 2003. Sustainability and Performance. MIT SLOAN Management Review 44(2), 65–70

  8. Gauthier, C. 2005. Measuring Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: The Extended Life-Cycle Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 59(2), 199–206

  9. Geibler, J. von, Liedtke, C., Wallbaum, H., Schaller, S. 2006. Accounting for the Social Dimension of Sustainability: Experiences from the Biotechnology Industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 15(5), 334–346

  10. Global Reporting Initiative: 2006, ‹RG; Sustainability Reporting Guidelines’, Guidelines Developed by GRI, 19 September

  11. van Heesch, T.: 2006, ‹Customer Value Analysis at Philips Medical Systems Magnetic Resonance. What’s the Fun of Selling Just on Price?’, Unpublished MA Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands

  12. Isaksson, R., Garvare, R. 2003. Measuring Sustainable Development Using Process Models. Managerial Auditing Journal 18(8), 649–656

  13. Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4), 602–611

  14. Keeble, J. J., Topiol, S., Berkeley, S. 2003. Using Indicators to Measure Sustainability Performance at a Corporate and Project Level. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2), 149–158

  15. Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

  16. Littig, B., Griessler, E. 2005. Social Sustainability: A Catchword Between Political Pragmatism and Social Theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(1–2), 65–79

  17. Maon, F., A. Lindgreen and V. Swaen: 2008, ‹Designing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Framework Grounded in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming

  18. Matthyssens, P., Vandenbempt, K. 2003. Cognition-in-Context: Reorienting Research in Business Market Strategy. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 18(6/7), 595–606

  19. Newman, I., Benz, C. R. 1998. Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

  20. Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N. L. 2005. Taking the ‹Q’ out of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without the Divide Between Quantitative and Qualitative Paradigms. Quality and Quantity 39(3), 267–296

  21. Ottman, J.: 1997, ‹What Sustainability Means to Marketers’, Marketing News (July 15), 4

  22. Philips Sustainability Report: 2006, Improving Lives, Delivering Value (Philips, Eindhoven, the Netherlands)

  23. Seuring, S. A., Koplin, J., Behrens, T., Schenidewind, U. 2003. Sustainability Assessment in the German Detergent Industry: From Stakeholder Involvement to Sustainability Indicators. Sustainable Development 11(4), 199–212

  24. Sherwin, C.: 2004, ‹Design and Sustainability: A Discussion Paper Based on Personal Experience and Observations’, The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 4(3), 21–31

  25. SIGMA Project: 2007, Website 8, available at http://projectsigma.co.uk (accessed April 15, 2007)

  26. Spiggle, S. 1994. Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 21(3), 491–503

  27. Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., Martinuzzi, A. 2005. Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations. Journal of Business Ethics 61(3), 263–281

  28. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CT: Sage

  29. Tanzil, D., Beloff, B. 2006. Assessing Impacts: Overview on Sustainability Indicators and Metrics: Tools for Implementing Sustainable Development in the Chemical Industry, and Elsewhere. Environmental Quality Management 15(4), 41–56

  30. Veleva, V., Ellenbecker, M. 2001. Indicators of Sustainable Production: Framework and Methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 9(6), 519–549

  31. Veleva, V., Hart, M., Greiner, T., Crumbley, C. 2000. Indicators of Sustainable Production. Journal of Cleaner Production 9(5), 447–452

  32. Walker, S. 2002. A Journey in Design: An Exploration of Perspectives for Sustainability. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 2(1), 3–10

  33. WCED: 1987, ‹Our Common Future’, Report of the World Commission of Environment and Development

  34. Wood, L. M. 1996. Added Value: Marketing Basics. Journal of Marketing Management 12(November), 735–755

  35. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Adam Lindgreen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindgreen, A., Antioco, M., Harness, D. et al. Purchasing and Marketing of Social and Environmental Sustainability for High-Tech Medical Equipment. J Bus Ethics 85, 445–462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9740-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • high-tech medical equipment
  • purchasing process
  • decision making stakeholders
  • environmental sustainability
  • social sustainability