Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 417–425 | Cite as

Transparent Practices: Primary and Secondary Data in Business Ethics Dissertations

Article

Abstract

We explore the availability and use of data (primary and secondary) in the field of business ethics research. Specifically, we examine an international sample of doctoral dissertations since 1998, categorizing research topics, data collection, and availability of data. Findings suggest that use of only primary data pervades the discipline, despite strong methodological reasons to augment business ethics research with secondary data.

Keywords

business ethics datasets doctoral research open data primary data secondary data 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, G. B., & White, J. D.: 1994, Dissertation Research in Public-Administration and Cognate Fields – An Assessment of Methods and Quality. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 565–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. 2003, Business Research Methods. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York)Google Scholar
  3. Chang, P. L., & Hsieh, P. N. 1997, A Qualitative Review of Doctoral Dissertations on Management in Taiwan. Higher Education, 33(2), 115–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowton, C. J. 1998, The Use of Secondary Data in Business Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 423–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crane, A. 1999, Are You Ethical? Please Tick Yes □ Or No □ on Researching Ethics in Business Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. A Fair Share: 2006, Nature 444(7120), 653–654Google Scholar
  7. Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W.: 2007, Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris, H. 2001, Content Analysis of Secondary Data: A Study of Courage in Managerial Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Monette, D. R., Sullivan, T. J., & DeJong, C. R.: 2005, Applied Social Research : A Tool for the Human Services (6th edition). (Thomson, Belmont, CA)Google Scholar
  10. Robertson, D. C.: 1993, Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(8), 585–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. 2006, The Poor Availability of Psychological Research Data for Reanalysis. American-Psychologist, 61(7), 726–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East LansingU.S.A.
  2. 2.College of New JerseyEwingU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations