Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 237–258 | Cite as

A Social Cognition Framework for Examining Moral Awareness in Managers and Academics

  • Jennifer JordanEmail author
Article

Abstract

This investigation applies a social cognition framework to examine moral awareness in business situations. Using a vignette-based instrument, the investigation compares the recall, recognition, and ascription of importance to moral- versus strategy-related issues in business managers (n = 86) and academic professors (n = 61). Results demonstrate that managers recall strategy-related issues more than moral-related issues and recognize and ascribe importance to moral-related issues less than academics. It also finds an inverse relationship between socialization in the business context and moral awareness. Future directions for moral awareness research and the practical implications for these findings are discussed.

Keywords

moral awareness moral sensitivity social cognition managers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson R. P. 1981. Psychological Status of the Script Concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agle, B. R.: 1996, Ethical Leadership at the Top: A Comprehensive Model and Illustrations of the Role of the Chief Executive Officer in Organizational Ethics. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  3. Agle B. R., Mitchell R. K., & Sonnenfeld J. A. 1999. Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson R. C., & Pearson P. D. 1984. A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. In: P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, pp. 255–291. New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson R. C., & Pichert J. W. 1978. Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson R. C., Pichert, J. W., & Shirey L. L. 1983. Effects of the Readers’ Schema at Different Points in Time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armstrong M. B. 1987. Moral Development and Accounting Education. Journal of Accounting Education, 5, 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashforth B. E., & Fried Y. 1988. The Mindlessness of Organizational Behaviors. Human Relations, 41, 305–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ausubel D. P. 1963. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning: An Introduction to School Learning. New York: Grune & StrattonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bargh J. A., & Thein R. D. 1985. Individual Construct Accessibility, Person Memory, and the Recall-Judgment Link: The Case of Information Overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1129–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bazerman M. H. 2001. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (5th ed.). New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  12. Bebeau M. J. 1994. Influencing the Moral Dimensions of Dental Practice. In J. R. Rest, D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, pp. 121–146. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  13. Bebeau M. J., Rest J. R., & Yamoor C. M. 1985. Measuring Dental Students’ Ethical Sensitivity. Journal of Dental Education, 49, 225–235Google Scholar
  14. Boyatzis R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  15. Brewer W. F., & Trayens J. C. 1981. Role of the Schemata in Memory for Places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown M. E., Trevino L. K., & Harrison D. A. 2005. Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Butterfield K. D., Trevino L. K., & Weaver G. R. 2000. Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influence of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. Human Relations, 53, 981–1018Google Scholar
  18. Carpendale J. I. M., & Krebs D. L. 1992. Situational Variation in Moral Judgment: In a Stage or on a Stage. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cattell R. B. 1966. The Scree Test for the Number of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chase W. G., & Simon H. A. 1973. Perception in Chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Child J. 1972. Organizational Structure, Environment, and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, 6, 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarkeburn, H.: 2002, `A Test for Ethical Sensitivity in Science', Journal of Moral Education 31, 440–453Google Scholar
  23. Dunteman, G. E.: 1989, ‘Principle Components Analysis’, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-069 (Sage, Newbury Park, CA)Google Scholar
  24. Eisenberg N., Spinrad T., & Sadovsky A. 2006. Empathy-Related Responding in Children. In: M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.) Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 517–549). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  25. Finkelstein S., & Hambrick D. C. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  26. Fiske S. T., & Taylor S. E. 1991. Social Cognition. New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
  27. Fraedrich, J. and O. C. Ferrell: 1992, `Cognitive Consistency of Marketing Managers in Ethical Situations', Journal of Academy of Marketing Sciences 20, 245–252Google Scholar
  28. Freeman R. E. 1994. The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 32–33, 122, 124, 126Google Scholar
  30. Gioia D. A. 1992. Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goetz E. T., Schallert D. L., Reynolds R. E., & Radin D. I. 1983. Reading in Perspective: What Real Cops and Pretend Burglars Look for in a Story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 500–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawkins D. I., & Cocanougher A. B. 1972. Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing, 36, 61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hebert P., Meslin E. M., Dunn E. V., Byrne N., & Reid S. R. 1990. Evaluating Ethical Sensitivity in Medical Students: Using Vignettes as an Instrument. Journal of Medical Ethics, 16, 141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hemsley G. D., & Marmurek H. H. C. 1982. Person Memory: The Processing of Consistent and Inconsistent Person Information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunt, D. and S. Vitell: 1986, `A General Theory of Marketing Ethics', Journal of Macromarketing (Spring), 5–16Google Scholar
  36. Hunt S. D., & Vitell S. 1992. A General Theory of Market Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision. In N. C. Smith, J. A. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics in Marketing, pp. 775–784. Homewood, IL: Richard D. IrwinGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones T. M. 1991. Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jordan, J.: 2007, `Taking a First Step Towards a Moral Action: A Review of Moral Sensitivity Measurement Across Domains', Journal of Genetic Psychology 168, 323–359Google Scholar
  39. Karcher J. N. 1996. Auditors’ Ability to Discern the Presence of Ethical Problems. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1033–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kardash C. A. M., Royer J. M., & Greene B. A. 1988. Effects of Schemata on Both Encoding and Retrieval of Information from Prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 324–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kelly C., Kocuurek P., McGaw N., & Samuelson J. 2004. Deriving Value from Corporate Values. New York: Aspen ISIBGoogle Scholar
  42. Kohlberg L. 1969. Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization and Research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNallyGoogle Scholar
  43. Kohlberg L. 1984. The Psychology of Moral Development (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  44. Markus H. 1977. Self-Schemata and Processing Information About the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgenson, G.: 2006, ‘Are Enrons Bustin’ Out All Over?’, New York Times, Sect. 3.1, May 28Google Scholar
  46. Ocasio W. 1997. Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pillutla M. M., & Chen X. 1999. Social Norms and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Context and Feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 81–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rest J. R. 1986. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: PreagerGoogle Scholar
  49. Rest J. R. 1994. Background: Theory and Research. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics (pp. 1–26). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  50. Rest J., Narvaez D., Bebeau M. J., & Thoma S. J. 1999. Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Reynolds S. J. 2006a. Moral Awareness and Ethical Predispositions: Investigating the Role of Individual Differences in the Recognition of Moral Issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reynolds S. J. 2006b. A Neurocognitive Model of the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Implications for Study and Practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schein E. H. 2004. Learning When and How to Lie: A Neglected Aspect of Organizational and Occupational Socialization. Human Relations, 57, 260–273Google Scholar
  54. Shaub M. K., Finn D. W., & Munter P. 1993. The Effects of Auditors’ Ethical Orientation on Commitment and Ethical Sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 145–164Google Scholar
  55. Shiffrin R. M., & Schneider M. W. 1977. Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simon H. A. 1945. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Sparks J. R., & Hunt S. D. 1998. Marketing Researcher Ethical Sensitivity: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Exploratory Investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62, 92–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Steffensen M. S., Joag-Dev C., & Anderson R. C. 1979. A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stern L. D., Marrs S., Millar M. G., & Cole E. 1984. Processing Time and the Recall of Inconsistent and Consistent Behaviors of Individuals and Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sternberg R. J., & Wagner R. K. 1985. Practical Intelligence in Real-World Pursuits: The Role of Tacit Knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 436–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stevens, J. P.: 1992, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 2nd Edition (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ)Google Scholar
  62. Stevens, G. E., W. D. Richardson and A. E. Abramowitz: 1989, ‘Perceptual Differences of Ethical Decision Situations Business vs. Law: A Difference of Opinion’, Southern Academy of Management Meeting Proceedings, 199–201Google Scholar
  63. Sundaram A. K., & Inkpen A. C. 2004. The Corporate Objective Revisited. Organizational Science, 15, 350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Taylor S. E., & Crocker J. 1981. Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 1, (pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  65. Taylor S. E., Crocker J., & D’Agostino, J. 1978. Schematic Bases of Social Problem-Solving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 447–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tenbrunsel A. E., & Messick D. M. 1999. Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thoma S. 1994. Moral Judgments and Moral Action. In J. R. Rest, & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, pp. 199–211. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  68. Trevino L. K. 1986. Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Trevino L. K., & Brown M. E. 2004. Managing to be Ethical: Debunking Five Business Ethics Myths. The Academy of Management Executive, 18, 69–77Google Scholar
  70. Trevino L. K., & Youngblood S. A. 1990. Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Trevino L. K., Brown M., & Hartman L. P. 2003. A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Ethical Suite. Human Relations, 56, 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. von Hippel W., Jonides J., Hilton J. L., & Narayan S. 1993. Inhibitory Effect of Schematic Processing on Perceptual Encoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 921–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weaver G. R., Trevino L. K., & Cochran P. L. 1999a. Corporate Ethics Programs as Control Systems: Influences of Executive Commitment and Environmental Factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weaver G. R., Trevino L. K., & Cochran P. L. 1999b. Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weber J. 1990. Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas. Human Relations, 43, 687–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weber R., & Crocker J. 1983. Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wood, D. J.: 1994, ‘Essays in the “Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory”’, in T. Jones (ed.), Business & Society 33, 101–105Google Scholar
  78. Wyer R. S. Jr., Srull T. K., Gordon S. E., & Hartwick J. 1982. Effects of Processing Objectives on the Recall of Prose Material. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 674–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zadny J. & Gerard H. B. 1974. Attributed Intentions and Informational Selectivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 34–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ford Center for Global CitizenshipKellogg School of ManagementEvanstonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations