Abstract
For much of the last 50 years, a key platform animating public sector reform in Canada and elsewhere has been that efficiency and effectiveness can be achieved by adapting private sector financial management methods and practices. We argue that the recent re-establishment of the Office of the Comptroller General (OCG) of Canada represents a key element of a program of strengthening financial accountability that has emerged within the Canadian Federal Government. Although this program is longstanding and is associated Canada’s implementation of new public management initiatives, it has recently drawn particular sustenance from the sponsorship scandal in Canada. We demonstrate that the reincarnated OCG, re-established amid a rhetoric of “modernization” and of “strengthening” accountability, has a wide-ranging mandate to enhance financial and audit controls, create financial standards, nurture professional development, and oversee government spending. We explore some of the consequences of this development and of the broader financial accountability mechanisms introduced in response to the Sponsorship scandal within the Canadian public sector.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R.: 2004, ‹Just the Tip of the Iceberg’, Toronto Star, 15 February, A13
Auditor General of Canada: 1976, Report of the Auditor General (Department of Supply and Services, Ottawa)
Baker, R. and M. Rennie: 2006, ‹Forces Leading to the Adoption of Accrual Accounting by the Canadian Federal Government: An Institutional Perspective’, Canadian Accounting Perspectives 5(1), 83–112
Borins S.: 2001, New Public Management, North American Style In McLaughlin K., Osborne S., Ferlie E. (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. London: Routledge, 181–194
Carnegie G., C. Napier: 1996, Critical and Interpretive Histories: Insights into Accounting’s Present and Future Through its Past. Accountability, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(3), 7–32
CBC Online: 2005, ‹In-Depth: Sponsorship Scandal’, available at website http://www.cbc.ca/printtablestroy.jsp, November 1, 2006
English L., J. Guthrie, L. Parker: 2005, Recent Public Sector Financial Management Change in Australia: Implementing the Market Model. In: Guthrie J., Humphrey C., Olson O., Jones L. (eds.) International Public Financial Management Reform: Progress, Contradictions and Challenges. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press, 23–54
Gendron Y., D. Cooper, B. Townley: 2001, In the Name of Accountability: State Auditing, Independence and New Public Management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 14(3), 278–310
Glassco Commission: 1962, Report of the Royal Commission on Government Organization. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer
Glor E.: 2001, Has Canada Adopted New Public Management? Public Management Review 3(1), 121–130
Gomery, J.: 2006, Restoring Accountability? Phase II Report (Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities, Ottawa)
Halligan J.: 2005, Public Management and Departments: Contemporary Themes – Future Agendas. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 1–15
Hood C.: 1998, The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management. New York: Oxford University Press
Lambert Commission: 1979, The Royal Commission on Financial Management and Accountability. Ottawa: Department of Supply and Services
Library and Archives Canada: 2006, Comptroller General of Canada Sous-Fonds. Archival reference no.: R776-122-8-E
Llewellyn S., R. Eden, C. Lay: 1999, Financial and Professional Incentives in Health Care: Comparing the UK and Canadian Experiences. International Journal of Public Sector Management 12(1), 6–16
Michael, B.: 2005, `Questioning Public Sector Accountability', Public Integrity 7(2), 95–109
Miller P., N. Rose: 1990, Governing Economic Life. Economy and Society 16(1), 395–403
Milne J.: 2006, Strategy, Accountability and the New Role of the CFO: Modernizing Financial Management in Government. Toronto: The Conference Board of Canada
Mulgan R.: 2003, Holding Power to Account. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Murphy, R.: 2004, ‹Follow that Man in the Getaway Car’, Globe and Mail, 21 February, A27
OECD: 1995, Governance in Transition: Public Management Reforms in OECD Countries (OECD Publications, Paris)
OECD: 2005, OECD in Figures – 2005 Edition. Paris: OECD Publications
Olson O., J. Guthrie, C. Humphrey: 1998, International Experiences with ‹New’ Public Financial Management (NPFM) Reforms: New World? Small World? Better World?. In Olson O., Guthrie J., Humphrey C. (eds.), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag, 17–48
Ott J., P. Boonyarak: 2001, New Public Management: Public Policymaking Dilemmas: Balancing Between Administrative Capacity, Control and Democratic. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal 1, 487–492
Pal L. A.: 2001, Beyond Policy Analysis: Public Issue Management in Turbulent Times. Toronto: Nelson Thomson Learning
Parker L., J. Guthrie: 1993, The Australian Public Sector in the 1990s: New Accountability Regimes in Motion. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 2(1), 57–79
Perreault F.: 2006, Inside Gomery. Toronto: Douglas & McIntyre
Power M.: (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Power M.: (2003). Auditing and the Production of Legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–394
Radcliffe V.: 1998, Efficiency Audit: An Assembly of Rationalities and Programmes. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(4), 377–410
Radcliffe V.: 1999, Knowing Efficiency: The Enactment of Efficiency in Efficiency Auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24(4), 333–362
Rosen, B.: 1989, Holding Government Bureaucracies Accountable (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT)
Shugarman, D. and I. Greene: 2006, ‹Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities, Phase I Report and Phase II Report’, Canadian Public Administration 49(2), 220–232
Spector, N.: 2006, ‹Judge Gomery’s Guide to Being Accountable’, Globe and Mail, February 6, A20
Stobo G.: 2006, Accounting for the Sins of the Father. Summit Journal 9(3), 16
Travers, J.: 2004, ‹Cleaning up a Fetid Mess’, Toronto Star, 10 February 2004, A17
Wanna J.: 2006, Insisting on Traditional Ministerial Responsibility and the Constitutional Independence of the Public Service: The Gomery Inquiry and the Canadian Sponsorship Scandal. Australian Journal of Public Administration 65(3), 15–21
Watson, W.: 2004, ‹To Lose Slime, Drain Swamp: Like ‹93 Liberals, Conservatives Can Campaign Against Rot’, National Post, 19 February, A1
Weeks, C.: 2006, ‹Grits Target Tory Accountability Legislation’, Canada.com. Available at website, http://www.canada.com/topics/news/politics/story.html?id=e611db9c-c74f-47d3-95a3-9d7563eb6c0c&k=55377, December 6, 2006
Wells P.: 2005, It’s not over yet. MacLean’s Magazine 118(46), 81–82
Williamson J., S. Haggard: 1994, The Political Conditions for Economic Reform. In Williamson J. (ed.), The Political Economy of Policy Reform. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Free, C., Radcliffe, V. Accountability in Crisis: The Sponsorship Scandal and the Office of the Comptroller General in Canada. J Bus Ethics 84, 189–208 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9681-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9681-8