Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Aspects of Using Government to Subvert Competition: Antidumping Laws as a Case Study of Rent Seeking Activity

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the question of whether it is ethical for company officials to use the force of government to reduce or eliminate foreign competition, using the antidumping laws as a case study. This article begins with a brief examination of the U.S. antidumping laws and then examines several ethical questions related to the antidumping laws. The main question to be addressed is whether, and under what circumstances, it is ethical for domestic producers to ask government to launch an antidumping investigation against a foreign competitor. Related questions to be examined include (1) Whether it is ethical to ask the government to launch an antidumping investigation even when the domestic company making the request knows that dumping has not occurred; (2) Whether it is ethical to ask for an antidumping investigation in cases where dumping (according to the definition of dumping) has occurred, where the effect is to help domestic producers at the expense of the general public. This article examines these questions by applying both utilitarian and non-utilitarian approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armentano D. T.: 1990, Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure. Second edition. Holmes & Meier, New York & London

    Google Scholar 

  • Armentano D. T.: 1999, Antitrust: The Case for Repeal. Revised Second edition. The Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiat F.: 1964a, Economic Harmonies. Foundation for Economic Education. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiat F.: 1964b, Economic Sophisms. Foundation for Economic Education. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiat F.: 1968, The Law. Foundation for Economic Education. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham J.: 1988, The Principles of Morals and Legislation. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Block W.: 1994, Total Repeal of Antitrust Legislation: A Critique of Bork, Brozen, and Posner, The Review of Austrian Economics 8(1), 35–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovard J.: 1991, The Fair Trade Fraud. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron May: 2006, The Global Anti-Dumping Handbook. Cameron May, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R. (ed.): 1997, Mill on Utilitarianism

  • Curtiss W. M.: 1953, The Tariff Idea. Foundation for Economic Education. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale R.: 1980, Anti-Dumping Law in a Liberal Trade Order. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher F. M.: 1987, On Predation and Victimless Crime, Antitrust Bulletin 32, 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M.: 1962, Capitalism & Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallaway M. R., B. A. Blonigen, J. E. Flynn: 1999, Welfare Costs of the U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws, Journal of International Economics 49(2), 211–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin R. E.: 1995, Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindley B., P. A. Messerlin: 1996, Antidumping Industrial Policy. The AEI Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hospers J.: 1971, Libertarianism: A Political Philosophy for Tomorrow. Nash Publishing, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer G. C., D. T. Berliner, K. A. Elliott: 1986, Trade Protection in the United States: 31 Case Studies. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll M. S.: 1987, United States Antidumping Law: The Case for Reconsideration. Texas International Law Journal 22, 265–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller R. H.: 1971, The Myth of Predatory Pricing: An Empirical Study, Antitrust Law and Economics Review 4, 105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey B., D. J. Ikenson: 2003, Antidumping Exposed: The Devilish Details of Unfair Trade Law. Cato Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastel G.: 1998, Antidumping Laws and the U.S. Economy. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee J. S.: 1958, Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N.J.) Case. Journal of Law and Economics 1, 137–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee R. W.: 1993, The Case to Repeal the Antidumping Laws, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 13(3), 491–562

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee R. W.: 1994, A Trade Policy for Free Societies: The Case against Protectionism. Quorum Books, Westport, CT & London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee R. W.: 1997, The Fatal Flaw in the Methodology of Law and Economics, Commentaries on Law and Economics 1, 209–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill J. S.: 1993, On Liberty and Utilitarianism. Bantam Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick R.: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmeter N. D.: 1986, Torquemada and the Tariff Act: The Inquisitor Rides Again, International Lawyer 20, 641–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton A.: 1988, Utilitarian Ethics. Open Court, LaSalle, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand A.: 1964, The Virtue of Selfishness. Signet Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D.: 1817, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation

  • Rockefeller E. S.: 2007, The Antitrust Religion. Cato Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard M. N.: 2004, Man, Economy, & State. Scholar’s Edition. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL

    Google Scholar 

  • Rottenberg S. (Ed.). 1980, Occupational Licensure and Regulation. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley C. K., R. D. Tollison, G. Tullock (eds). 1988, The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht & Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J. A.: 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw W. H.: 1999, Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shughart W. F. II: 1990, Antitrust Policy and Interest-Group Politics. Quorum Books, New York, Westport & London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G.: 1987, Private Wants, Public Means: An Economic Analysis of the Desirable Scope of Government. University Press of America, Lanham, New York & London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G.: 1989, The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht & London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G.: 1993, Rent Seeking. Edward Elgar Publishing Company, Brookfield, VT & Hants, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • United States International Trade Commission: 1995, The Economic Effects of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders and Suspension Agreements. Investigation No. 332–344, Publication 2900. Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, June

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. McGee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGee, R.W. Ethical Aspects of Using Government to Subvert Competition: Antidumping Laws as a Case Study of Rent Seeking Activity. J Bus Ethics 83, 759–771 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9663-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9663-x

Keywords

Navigation