Skip to main content
Log in

In Defence of Principles? A Response to Lurie and Albin

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a response to a recent article by Yotam Lurie and Robert Albin in which they discuss and present the merits of casuistry as a method for resolving moral dilemmas in business, principally by developing ‹edifying’ perspectives on the situation, and in doing so highlight the shortcomings of principles (such as the categorical imperative) in generating insights and thereby moral choices. The present article accepts the importance of cases and examples as a source of insight, but argues that the process of conceptualisation involved in understanding these necessarily involves some reference to principles. However, principles and cases are best seen as complementary to the ethical decision-making process rather than in opposition. The complementary functions of these are highlighted in processes such as reflection upon experience, in applications of moral imagination and in the integration of emotive and cognitive elements in ethical choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkeley, B.: 1998, Originally 1710, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (Oxford University Press).

  • Clegg, B. and P. Birch: 2007, Instant Creativity: Simple Techniques to Ignite Innovation and Problem Solving (Kogan Page).

  • Forsyth D. R.: (1980) A Taxonomy of Ethical Decision Ideologies. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 39(1), 175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D.: 2005, Originally 1995, Emotional Intelligence (Anniversary Edition) (Bantam Books).

  • Kant, I.: 1998, Originally 1790, Critique of the Power of Judgement (trans. J. C. Meredith) (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

  • Kant, I.: 2004, Originally 1785, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals Edited H. J. Paton (Under the Title The Moral Law) (Routledge).

  • Kaebnick E. G.: (2000) On the Intersection of Casuistry and Particularism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10(4), 307–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb D. A.: (1984) Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1971, From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away with It in the Study of Moral Development (Academic Press).

  • La Forge P. G.: (2004) Cultivating Moral Imagination Through Meditation. Journal of Business Ethics 51(1), 15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurie Y., Albin R.: (2007) Moral Dilemmas in Business Ethics: From Decision Procedures to Edifying Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 71, 195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell B., Reichenbach R.: (2005) Imitation, Imagination and Re-Appraisal: Educating the Moral Emotions. Journal of Moral Education 34(3), 291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.: 1986, The Fragility of Goodness (Cambridge University Press).

  • Simon, H.: 1997, Originally 1947, Administrative Behaviour (Simon and Schuster).

  • Werhane, P.: 1999, Moral Imagination and Management Decision Making (Oxford University Press).

  • Williams, B. A. O.: 1976, ‹Morality and the Emotions’, Reprinted in Problems of the Self (Cambridge University Press), pp. 207–229.

  • Winch, P.: 1972, Ethics and Action (Routledge and Kegan Paul).

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations (trans. E.␣Anscombe) (Blackwell, Oxford).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Griseri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griseri, P. In Defence of Principles? A Response to Lurie and Albin. J Bus Ethics 83, 615–625 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9642-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9642-7

Keywords

Navigation