Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 355–370 | Cite as

Corporate Social Responsibility and the Social Enterprise

  • Nelarine CorneliusEmail author
  • Mathew Todres
  • Shaheena Janjuha-Jivraj
  • Adrian Woods
  • James Wallace


In this article, we contend that due to their size and emphasis upon addressing external social concerns, the corporate relationship between social enterprises, social awareness and action is more complex than whether or not these organisations engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR). This includes organisations that place less emphasis on CSR as well as other organisations that may be very proficient in CSR initiatives, but are less successful in recording practices. In this context, we identify a number of internal CSR markers that may be applied to measuring the extent to which internal CSR practices are being observed. These considerations may be contrasted with the evidence that community based CSR activities is often well developed in private sector small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs) (Observatory of European SMEs, 2002), a situation which may be replicated in social enterprises especially those that have grown from micro-enterprises embedded in local communities. We place particular emphasis upon the implications for employee management. Underpinning our position is the Aristotelian-informed capabilities approach, a theory of human development and quality of life, developed by Sen (1992; 1999) and Nussbaum (1999) which has been developed further, in an organisational context, (e.g., Cornelius, 2002); Cornelius and Gagnon, 2004; Gagnon and Cornelius, 1999; Vogt, 2005. We contend that the capabilities approach offers additional insights into CSR in social enterprises in general and internal CSR activity in particular. Our article concludes with proposals for future research initiatives and reflections upon social enterprise development from a capabilities perspective.


capabilities theory corporate social responsibility human resource management small business social enterprise 



Corporate social responsibility


Corporate identity


Human Resource Management


Human Resource Development


Organisational Identity


Small to medium sized enterprise


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balmer J. M. T., S. A. Greyser: 2002 Managing the Multiple Identities of the Corporation. California Management Review 44(3): 72–86Google Scholar
  2. Banks S., F. Shenton: 2001 Regenerating Neighbourhoods: A Critical Look at the Role of Community Capacity Building. Local Economy, 16(4): 286–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartels K. K., E. Harrick, K. Martell, D. Strickland: 1998, The Relationship Between Ethical Climate and Ethical Problems within Human Resource Management. Journal of Business Ethics 17(7):799–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennet, J. and E. Iossa: 2005, ‘Contracting Out Public Service Provision to Not-For-Profit Firms’, Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, pp. 1–29Google Scholar
  5. Bird B.: 1989 Entrepreneurial Behaviour. Glenview Ilinois: Scott Foreman and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  6. Bornstein D. 2004 How to Change the World: Social Enterprises and the Power of New Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Borzaga C., J. Defourny: 2001 The Emergence of Social Enterprise. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Carby-Hall J.: 2005 ‘Wherefore Art Thou Oh Social Responsibility of the Enterprise?’ The United Kingdom Experience. Managerial Law 47(6): 205–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassell C., S. Nadin, M. Gray, C. Clegg: 2002 Exploring Human Resource Management Practices in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Personnel Review 31(6): 671–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castka P., M. A. Balzarova, C. J. Bamber 2004 How can SMEs Effectively Implement the CSR Agenda? A UK Case Study Perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11(3): 140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornelius N. (2002) Building Workplace Equality: Ethics, Diversity and Inclusion. London: Thomson PublishingGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornelius N., S. Gagnon: (2004) ‘Still Bearing the Mark of Cain? Ethics, Diversity and Inequality Measurement. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(1): 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornelius N., D. Skinner: (2005) An Alternative View through the Glass Ceiling: Using Capabilities Theory to Reflect the Career Journeys of Senior Women. Women in Management Review 20(8): 595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornelius, N. and D. Skinner: 2007, ‘An Empirical, Capabilities Theory-Informed Study of the Career Journeys of Senior Women and Men’, British Journal of Management, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi: 1997, Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life (Basic Books, New York)Google Scholar
  16. Dart R.: 2004 The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14(Summer): 411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dees, J. G.: 1998a, ‘The Meaning of Social Enterprise’ Scholar
  18. Dees J. G.: 1998b Enterprising Non Profits. Harvard Business Review 76(1): 55–66Google Scholar
  19. Department for Trade and Industry: 2002, ‘Social Enterprise: A Strategy for Success’, available at Scholar
  20. Duccie G., C. Stentella, P. Vulterini: 2002 The Social Enterprise in Europe. International Journal of Mental Health 13(3), 76–91. Google Scholar
  21. Elkington J.: 1999, Cannibals with Forks: Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. New Society Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Emanuele R., S. H. Higgins: 2000 Corporate Culture in the Non-profit Sector: A Comparison of Fringe Benefits with the For-profit Sector. Journal of Business Ethics 24(1): 87–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission: 2001, Green Paper on the Corporate Social Responsibility of Business, Brussels, COM 366 final, 18.7.2001 quoted in Habisch, A. (2004)Google Scholar
  24. Foote D.: 2001 The Question of Ethical Hypocrisy in Human Resource Management in the U.K. and Irish Charity Sectors. Journal of Business Ethics 34(1): 25–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frogget L., P. Chamberlayne: 2004 Narratives of Social Enterprise: From Biography to Practice and Policy Critique. Qualitative Social Work, 3(1): 61–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gagnon S., N. Cornelius: 1999, From Ethics ‘By Proxy’ to Ethics In Action: New Approaches to Understanding HRM and Ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 8(4):225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garcia-Marza D.: 2005 Trust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing. Journal of Business Ethics 57(3): 209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garriga E., D. Mele: 2004 Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53(1–2): 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graafland J., B. van de Ven, N. Stoffele: 2003 Strategies and Instruments for Organising CSR by Small and Large Businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics 47(1): 45–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenwood M. R.: 2001, The Importance of Stakeholders According to Business Leaders. Business and Society Review 106(1):29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greenwood M. R.: 2002, Ethics and Human Resource Management: A Review and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 36(3):279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Habisch A.: 2004 Social Responsibility, Social Capital and SMEs. In: L. J. Spence, A. Habisch, R. Schmidpeter (eds) Responsibility and Social Capital, the World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 25–34. Google Scholar
  33. Haigh M., M. T. Jones: 2006 The Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Review. Business Review 5(2): 245–251Google Scholar
  34. Harney B., T. Dundon: 2006 Capturing Complexity: Developing an Integrated Approach to Analysing HRM in SMEs. Human Resource Management Journal 16(1): 48–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henriques A., J. Richardson: 2004 The Triple Bottom Line: Does it all Add up?. London: Earthscan. Google Scholar
  36. Hill M. T.: 2003, Development as Empowerment. Feminist Economics 9(2&3):117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill R., J. Stewart: 2000 Human Resource Development in Small Organisations. Journal of European Industrial Training 24(2/3/4): 105–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hines F.: 2005 Viable Social Enterprise – An Evaluation of Business Support to Social Enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal 1(1): 13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jan-Khan M.: 2003 The Right to Riot. Community Development Journal 38(1): 32–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janjuha-Jivraj S.: (2003) The Sustainability of Social Capital within Ethnic Networks. Journal of Business Ethics 47: 31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Janjuha-Jivraj S.: 2004, The Sustainability of Informal Ethnic Business Networks. In L. Spence and R. Schumpeeter (eds) The Social World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: Social Capital and Responsibility, London, PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaptein M., J. Wempe: 2002 The Balanced Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  43. Kotey B., A. Sheridan: 2004 Changing HRM Practices with Firm Growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11(4): 474–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maignan I., D. A. Ralston: 2002 Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from Businesses: Self-Presentations. Journal of International Business Studies 33(3): 497–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mancino A., A. Thomas: 2005 An Italian Pattern of Social Enterprise: The Social Cooperative. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 15(3), 357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mazzarol T.: 2003 A Model of Small Business HR Growth Management. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 9(1): 27–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moore G., R. Beadle: 2006 In Search of Organizational Virtue in Business: Agents, Goods, Practices, Institutions and Environments. Organization Studies 27(3): 369–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nussbaum M. C.: 1999, Women and Equality: The Capabilities Approach. International Labour Review 138(3):227–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Observatory of European SMEs: 2004, European SMEs and Social and Environmental Responsibility, 2002/No. 4 (European Commission: Enterprise Publications, 2002) cited in Habisch, AGoogle Scholar
  50. Quinn J. J.: 1997 Personal Ethics and Business Ethics: The Ethical Attitudes of Owner/Managers of Small Business. Journal of Business Ethics 16(2): 119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rainnie A.: 1989 Industrial Relations in Small Firms. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Ram M., R. Holliday: 1993 Relative Merits of Family Kinship and Culture in Small Firms. Sociology 27(4): 629–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reid R., T. Morrow, B. Kelly, P. McCartan: 2002 People Management in SMEs: An Analysis of Human Resources Strategies in Family and Non-family Businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 9(3): 245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rorrty R.: 2000, Philosophy and Social Hope. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Sen A.: 1992, Inequality Reexamined. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. Sen A.: 1999 Development as Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Sennett R.: 1999, The corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Smallbone, D., M. Evans, I. Ekanem and S. Butters: 2001, ‘Researching Social Enterprise’, Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex UniversityGoogle Scholar
  59. Small Business Service: 2005, ‘A Survey of Social Enterprises Across the UK’, Available: Scholar
  60. Spence L.: 1999 Does Size Matter? The State of the Art in Small Business Ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 8(3): 163–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Swanson D. L.: 1995, Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review 20(1):43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Takala T., P. Pallab: 2000 Individual, Collective and Social Responsibility of the firm. Business Ethics: A European Review 9(2): 109–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van Marrewijk M., I. Wuisman, W. de Cleyn, J. Timmers, V. Papapanaan, L. Linnanen: 2004 A Phase-Wise Development Approach to Business Excellence: Towards an Innovative, Stakeholder-Oriented Assessment Tool for Organizational Excellence and CSR. Journal of Business Ethics 55(2): 83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vogt C. P.: 2005 Maximizing Human Potential: Capabilities Theory and the Professional Work Environment. Journal of Business Ethics 58(1–3): 111–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vyakarnam S. B., A. Myers, D. Burnett: 1997 Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behaviour in Small Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 16(15): 1625–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waddock S.: 2004 Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics, and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review 109(1): 5–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilkinson A.: 1999 Employment Relations in SMEs. Employee Relations 21(3): 206–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Williamson I. O.: 2001 Employer Legitimacy and Recruitment Success in Small Businesses. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 24(1): 27Google Scholar
  69. Windsor D.: 2006 Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches. Journal of Management Studies 43(1): 93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van der Woerd F., T. van den Brink: 2004 Feasibility of Responsive Business Scorecard – A Pilot Study. Journal of Business Ethics 55(2): 173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Welford, R.: 2005, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and Asia: Critical Elements and Best Practice’, Corporate Social Review 13, 31–47Google Scholar
  72. Wilkinson A., J. M. T. Balmer: 1996 Corporate and Generic Identities: Lessons from for Co-operative Bank. International Journal of Bank Management 14(4): 22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Winstanley D., J. Woodhall, E. Heery: 1996, The Agenda for ethics in Human Resource Management. Business Ethics: A European Review 5(4):187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Woodhams C., B. Lupton: 2006 Does Size Matter? Gender-based Equal Opportunity in UK small and Medium Enterprises. Women in Management Review 21(2): 143–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nelarine Cornelius
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mathew Todres
    • 2
  • Shaheena Janjuha-Jivraj
    • 3
  • Adrian Woods
    • 1
  • James Wallace
    • 4
  1. 1.Brunel Business SchoolBrunel UniversityUxbridgeU.K.
  2. 2.Department of General Practice and Primary CareKing’s College London School of Medicine, University of LondonLondonU.K.
  3. 3.Business SchoolUniversity of ReadingReadingU.K.
  4. 4.School of ManagementUniversity of BradfordBradfordU.K.

Personalised recommendations