Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 297–312 | Cite as

Shareholders and Social Responsibility

  • Brian P. SchaeferEmail author
Article

Abstract

The article presents an analysis and critique of Milton Friedman’s argument that the social responsibility of business is merely to increase its profits. The analysis uncovers a central claim that Friedman implies, but does not explicitly defend, namely that the shareholders of a corporation have no duty to direct that corporation’s management to exercise social responsibility. An argument against this claim is then advanced by way of a convergence strategy, whereby multiple influential moral approaches are shown to align themselves against Friedman. The convergence strategy shows that Friedman’s position lies on the lonely fringes of Western moral thought, and that at least some of Friedman’s professed adherents appear to offer incoherent moral views. The convergence strategy is shown to suggest, but not entail, a stakeholder model of the corporation. The article concludes by considering two objections.

Keywords

corporation investor Judeo/Christian ethics Kantianism management shareholder social responsibility stakeholder utilitarianism virtue ethics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North CarolinaChapel HillU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations