Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 281–295 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Double Standards

  • Iris VermeirEmail author
  • Patrick Van Kenhove
Article

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate gender differences in the use of double standards in ethical judgements of questionable conduct instigated by business or consumers. We investigate if consumers are more critical towards unethical corporate versus consumer actions and if these double standards depend on the gender of the respondent. In the first study, we compared evaluations of four specific unethical actions [cfr. DePaulo, 1987, in: J. Saegert (ed.) Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology (American Psychological Association, Washington DC)] instigated by either the consumer or the corporation. In a second study, we investigated the perception of some general consumer and corporate (un)ethical actions in addition to DePaulo’s unethical scenarios. Both researches show that females are less likely to use double standards when it comes to their own (un)ethical behaviour compared to corporate (un)ethical actions. Furthermore, gender differences in the use of double standards depend on the type of unethical behaviour. Limitations and suggestions for further research are discussed.

Keywords

consumer ethics double standards gender ethical evaluations ethical beliefs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett T. (2001) Dimensions of Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision Making: An Empirical Study Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31(5): 1038–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beu D. S., M. R. Buckley, M. G. Harvey (2003) Ethical Decision-Making, A Multidimensional Construct. Business Ethics: A European Review 12:88–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bone P. F., R. J. Corey (2000) Packaging Ethics: Perceptual Differences among Packaging Professionals, Brand Managers, and Ethically-Interested Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 15:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borkowski S. C., Y. J. Urgas (1998) Business Students and Ethics: A Meta Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 11(7):1117–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan A., S. Wong, P. Leung (1998) Ethical Beliefs of Chinese Consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics 17:1163–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen J. R., L. W. Pand, D. J. Sharp (2001) An Examination of Differences in Ethical-Decision Making Between Canadian Business Students and Accounting Professionals. Journal of Business Ethics 15:889–896Google Scholar
  7. Collins D. (2000) The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1500 Articles published in Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 26:1–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creyer E. H., W. T. Ross (1997) Tradeoffs between Price and Quality: How a Value Index Affects Preference Formation Journal of Consumer Affairs 31(2):280–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crown D. F., M. S. Spiller (1998) Learning from the Literature on College Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research Journal of Business 17(6):683–700Google Scholar
  10. Davis R.M.: 1979, ‹Comparison of Consumer Acceptance of Rights and Responsibilities’, in N. M. Ackerman (ed.), Proceedings 25th Annual Conference of the American Council on Consumer Interests Google Scholar
  11. Dawson L. M. (1997) Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in the Sales Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1143–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DePaulo P.: 1987, ‹Ethical Perceptions of Deceptive Bargaining Tactics Used by Salespersons and Customers: A Double Standard’, in: J. Sagert (ed.) Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology (American Psychological Association, Washington DC)Google Scholar
  13. DePaulo P.: 1985, ‹The Ethics of Deception in Retail Bargaining: Do Consumers Accept the Game Analogy?’, Paper Presented at the 1985 Conference of the Southwestern Marketing Association, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  14. Deshpande S. P. (1997) Managers Perception of Proper Ethical Conduct: The Effect of Sex, Age and Level of Education. Journal of Business Ethics 16(1): 79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobson J., J. White (1995) Toward the Feminine Firm: An Extension to Thomas White. Business Ethics Quarterly 5(3): 463–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drucker P. (1981) What is Business Ethics? The Public Interest 63(2): 18–36Google Scholar
  17. Folkes V. S., M. Kamins (1999) Effects of Information about Firms Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3): 243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franke G. R., D. E. F. Crown, D. F. Spake (1997) Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Business Practices: A Social Role Theory Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(6): 920–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fullerton S., K. B. Kerch, H. R. Dodge (1996) Consumer Ethics: An Assessment of Individual Behaviour in the Market Place. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 805–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galbraith S., H. B. Stephenson (1993) Decision Rules used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgments: Another Look. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilligan C (1982) In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Grimshaw, J.: 1999, ‹The Idea of a Female Ethic’, in P. Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics (Blackwell Publishers, Inc)Google Scholar
  23. Harris J., C. Sutton (1995) Unravelling the Ethical Decision Making Process: Clues from an Empirical study Comparing Fortune 1000 Executives and MBA Students. Journal of Business Ethics 14: 805–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffman J. (1998) Are Women Really More Ethical Than Men? Maybe it depends on the Situation. Journal of Managerial Issues 10: 60–73Google Scholar
  25. Hunt A. (1997) Are Women more Ethical than Men? Baylor Business Review 15: 7Google Scholar
  26. Ingram R., Skinner S. J., V. A. Taylor (2005) Consumers’ Evaluation of Unethical Marketing Behaviors: The Role of Customer Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 62(3): 237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones G., M. Kavanaugh (1996) An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioural Intentions in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones J. L., K. L. Middleton (2007) Ethical Decision-Making by Consumers: The Roles of Product Harm and Consumer Vulnerability. Journal of Business Ethics 70: 247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knights D., M. O’Leary (2006) Leadership, Ethics and Responsibility to the Other. Journal of Business Ethics 67(2): 125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kohlberg L. (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development in Essays on Moral Development, Volume 2. Harper and Rowe, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  31. Laczniak G. R., P. E. Murphy (1991) Fostering Ethical Marketing Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 10(4): 259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loe T., W. A. Weeks (2000) An Experiment Investigation of Efforts to Improve Sales Students’ Moral Reasoning. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 20: 243–254Google Scholar
  33. Lopez Y. P., Rechner P. L., J. B. Olson-Buchanan: (2005) Shaping Ethical Perceptions: An Empirical Assessment of the Influence of Business Education, Culture and Demographic Factors. Journal of Business Ethics 20: 341–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mason E. S., P. E. Mudrack (1996) Gender and Ethical Orientation: A Test of Gender and Occupational Socialization Theories. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCabe A. C., Ingram R., M. C. Dato-On (2006) The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 64(2): 101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Messick D. M, M. H. Bazerman (1996) Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making. Sloan Management Review 37(2): 9–22Google Scholar
  37. Muncy J. A., S. J. Vitell (1992) Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer. Journal of Business Research 24: 297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Fallon M. J., K. D. Butterfield (2003) A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics 59: 375–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rawwas M. Y. A. (1996) Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Austrian Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 15(9): 1009–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reidenbach R., D. Robin (1990) Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 9: 639–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ritter B. A. (2006) Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-Making Process in Business Students. Journal of Business Ethics 68: 153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robin D., L. Babin (1997) Making Sense of the Research in Gender and Ethics in Business: A Critical Analysis and Extension. Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 61–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson S. L., R. J. Bennett (1995) A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviours: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal 38: 555–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roxas M. L., J. Y Stoneback (2004) The Importance of Gender across Cultures. Journal of Business Ethics 50: 149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruegger D., E. W. King (1992) A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 11: 179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simga-Mugan C., B. A. Daly, D. Onkal, L. Kavut (2005) The Influence of Nationality and Gender on Ethical Sensitivity: An Application of the Issue-Contingent Model. Journal of Business Ethics 57: 139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singer M. S. (1996) The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public. Journal of Business Ethics 15(4): 469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith P. L, E. F. Oakley (1997) Gender-Related differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management. Journal of Business Ethics 16: 37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smyth M. L., J. R. Davis (2004) Perceptions of Dishonesty among 2-Year College Students: Academic versus Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 51: 63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strutton D., S. J. Vitell, L. E. Pelton (1994) How Consumers May Justify Inappropriate Behaviour in Market Settings: An Application on the Techniques of Neutralization. Journal of Business Research 30(3): 253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tsalikis J., M. Ortiz-Buonafina (1990) Ethical Beliefs’ Differences of Males and Females. Journal of Business Ethics 9: 509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trevion L. K., Weaver G. R., S. J. Reynolds (2006) Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review. Journal of Management 32(6): 951–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Kenhove P., I. Vermeir, S. Verniers (2001) An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Ethical Beliefs, Ethical Ideology, Political Preference and Need for Closure. Journal of Business Ethics 32(4): 347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vitell S. J., J. A. Muncy (1992) Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer. Journal of Business Ethics 11(8): 585–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitell S. J. (2003) Consumer Ethics Research: Review, Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future. Journal of Business Ethics 43: 33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Volkema R. J. (2004) Demographic, Cultural, and Economic Predictors of Perceived Ethicality of Negotiation Behavior: A Nine-Country Analysis. Journal of Business Research 57(1): 69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weeks W. A., C. W. Moore, J. A. McKinney, J. G. Longenecker (1999) The Effect of Gender and Career Stage on Ethical Judgment. Journal of Business Ethics 20: 301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitley B. E. Jr., A. B. Nelson, C. J. Jones (1999) Gender Differences in Cheating Attitudes and Classroom Cheating Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis. Sex Roles 41: 657–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whysall P. (2000) Addressing Ethical Issues in Retailing: A Stakeholder Perspective. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(3): 305–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilkes R. E. (1978) Fraudulent Behaviour by Consumers. Journal of Marketing 42: 67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wood G. (1995) Ethics at the Purchasing/Sales Interface: An International Perspective. International Marketing Review 12(4): 7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Administration and ManagementHogeschool GhentGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Economics and Business AdministrationGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations