Skip to main content

Gender Diversity in Corporate Governance and Top Management

Abstract

This article examines whether and how the participation of women in the firm’s board of directors and senior management enhances financial performance. We use the Fama and French (1992, 1993) valuation framework to take the level of risk into consideration, when comparing firm performances, whereas previous studies used either raw stock returns or accounting ratios. Our results indicate that firms operating in complex environments do generate positive and significant abnormal returns when they have a high proportion of women officers. Although the participation of women as directors does not seem to make a difference in this regard, firms with a high proportion of women in both their management and governance systems generate enough value to keep up with normal stock-market returns. These findings tend to support the policies currently being discussed or implemented in some countries and organizations to foster the advancement of women in business.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adams, R. B. and D. Ferreira: 2004, `Gender Diversity in the Boardroom', European Corporate Governance Institute, Finance Working paper # 57, 30 p

  2. Adler, R. D.: 2001, `Women in the Executive Suite Correlate to High Profits', Glass ceiling Research Center, http://glass-ceiling.com/InTheNewsFolder/HBRArticlePrintablePage.html

  3. Arfken D. E., Bellar S. L., Helms M. M. (2004) The Ultimate Glass Ceiling Revisited: The Presence of Women on Corporate Boards. Journal of Business Ethics 50, 177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Audet, M.: 2006, `To Modernize the Public Corporations Governance', Statement of policy, 33 p

  5. Bilimoria, D. and S. K. Piderit: 1994, Board Committee Membership: Effects of Sexbased

  6. Boehme R. D., Sorescu S. M. (2002) The Long-Run Performance Following Dividend Initiations and Resumptions: Underreaction or Product of Chance? Journal of Finance 57, 871–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, D. A., B. J. Simkins and W. G. Simpson: 2003, `Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value,' The Financial Review 38, 33–53

    Google Scholar 

  8. Catalyst: 2004, `The Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity', Catalyst Publication Code D58, New York, 28 p

  9. Conference Board: 2005, `Emerging Trends in Europe… Women in Leadership. The Diversity Imperative: Supporting Actions for Change', By D. Palframan. Executive Action Series No. 158 (August), 7 p

  10. Daily C. M., Trevis C. S., Dalton D. R. (1999) A Decade of Corporate Women: Some Progress in the Boardroom, None in the Executive Suite. Strategic Management Journal 20, 93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dallas, L. L.: 2002, `The New Managerialism and Diversity on Corporate Boards of Directors', Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper 38 (Spring), University of San Diego School of Law (http://ssrn.com/abstract_id = 313425), 30 p

  12. Dewatripont M., Jewitt I., Tirole J. (1999) The Economics of Career Concerns, Part II: Application to Mission and Accountability in Government Agencies. Review of Economic Studies 66(1), 199–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixit A. K. (1996) The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Donaldson, T. and L. Preston: 1995, `The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications', The Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65

  15. Fama E. F., French K. R. (1992) The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance 47(2), 427–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fama E. F., French K. R. (1993) Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farrell, K. A. and P. L. Hersch: 2001, `Additions to Corporate Boards: Does Gender Matter', Working paper, 30 p

  18. Fields M. A., Keys P. Y. (2003) The Emergence of Corporate Governance from Wall St.: Outside Directors, Board Diversity, Earnings Management, and Managerial Incentives to Bear Risk. The Financial Review 38, 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heath J., Norman W. (2004) Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach us in the Post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics 53, 247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanter R. M. (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, Basic Books. 348 p

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kesner I. F. (1988) Directors’ Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure and Gender. Academy of Management Journal 31, 66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kramer, V. W., A. M. Konrad and S. Erkut: 2006, `Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three or More Women Enhance Governance', Wellesley Centers for Women, Report No. WCW 11. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women

  23. Li C. A., Wearing B. (2004) Between Glass Ceilings: Female Non-executive Directors in UK Quoted Companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 1(4, Oct), 355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rotemberg J. J., Saloner G. (1993) Leadership Styles and Incentives. Management Science 39(11), 1299–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryan M. K., Haslam S. A. (2006) What Lies Beyond the Glass Ceiling? Human Resource Management International Digest 14, 3–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryan M. K., Haslam S. A. (2005) The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women Are Over-Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions. British Journal of Management 16, 81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shrader, C. B., V. B. Blackburn and P. Iles: 1997, `Women in Management and Firm Financial Performance: An Exploratory Study', Journal of Managerial Issues 9(3) (Fall), 355–372

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tirole J. (2001) Corporate Governance. Econometrica 69(1), 1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Westphal J. D., Milton L. P. (2000) How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Board. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(2), 366–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Financial support from the Autorité des marchés financiers and Desjardins Securities is gratefully acknowledged. We are especially grateful to Val Singh, the section Editor, and to the two anonymous reviewers of the Journal of Business Ethics for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. The usual caveat applies.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Francoeur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francoeur, C., Labelle, R. & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. Gender Diversity in Corporate Governance and Top Management. J Bus Ethics 81, 83–95 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9482-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • gender diversity
  • corporate governance
  • agency theory
  • stakeholder theory