Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 63–81 | Cite as

Understanding the Ethical Cost of Organizational Goal-Setting: A Review and Theory Development

  • Adam Barsky
Article

Abstract

Goal-setting has become a popular and effective motivational tool, utilized by practitioners and substantiated with decades of empirical research. However, the potential for goal-setting to enhance performance may come at the cost of ethical behavior. I propose a theoretical model linking attributes of goals and goal-setting practices to unethical behavior through two psychological mechanisms – ethical recognition and moral disengagement; and addressing the moderating role of individual differences (e.g., goal-commitment and conscientiousness), as well as the broader organizational ethical context.

Keywords

business ethics corruption goal-setting motivation self-regulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler P. S., Borys B. 1996. Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 61–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison S. T., Messick D. M., Goethals G. R. 1989. On Being Better but not Smarter than Others: The Muhammad Ali Effect. Social Cognition, 7: 275–295Google Scholar
  3. Ashforth B. E., Anand V. 2003. The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 25: 1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin J. T., Vancouver J. B. 1996. Goal Constructs in Psychology: Structure, Process, and Content. Psychological Bulletin, 120: 338–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: FreemanGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura A. 1999. Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3: 193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura A., Barbaranaelli C., Caprara G. V., Pastorelli C. 1996. Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 364–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bargh J. A., Chaiken S., Govender R., Pratto F. 1992. The Generality of the Automatic Attitude Activation Effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 62: 893–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batson C. D., Thompson E. R., Seuferling G. 1999. Moral Hypocrisy: Appearing Moral to Oneself without being so. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77: 525–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bersoff D. M. 2001. Why Good People Sometimes do Bad Things: Motivated Reasoning and Unethical Behavior. In J. Dienhart, D. Moberg, R. Duska (eds.), The Next Phase of Business Ethics: Integrating Psychology and Ethics, Vol. 3 (pp. 239–262). New York: JAI PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beu D. S., Buckley M. R. 2004. This War: How the Politically Astute Achieve Crimes of Obedience through the Use of Moral Disengagement. Leadership Quarterly, 15: 551–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bierbrauer G. 1976. Why did he do it? Attribution of Obedience and the Phenomenon of Dispositional Bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9: 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brief A. P., Buttram R. T., Dukerich J. M. 2001. Collective Corruption in the Corporate World: Toward a Process Model. In M. E. Turner (ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  14. Brief A. P., Dietz J., Cohen R. R., Pugh S. D., Vaslow J. B. 2000. Just Doing Business: Modern Racism and Obedience to Authority as Explanations for Employment Discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81: 72–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brief A. P., Dukerich J. M., Brown P. R., Brett J. F. 1996. What’s Wrong with the Treadway Commission Report? Experimental Analyses of the Effects of Personal Values and Codes of Conduct on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burnham, D.: 1988, ‹Punish or Perish at IRS,’ Washington Post March 13, C1& C2Google Scholar
  17. Campbell J. P., McCloy R. A., Oppler S. H., Sager C. E. 1993. A Theory of Job Performance. In N. Schmidt, W. Borman (eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  18. Carver C. S., Scheier M. F. 1998. On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Colman J. W. 1987. The Criminal Elite: Understanding White-Collar Crime, 4th edn. New York: St. Martin’s PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Cotton J. L., Vollrath D. A., Froggartt K. L. Lengnick-Hall M. L., et al. 1988. Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 13: 8–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cummings L. 1965. Organizational climates for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 8: 220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dachler H. P., Wilpert B. 1978. Conceptual Dimensions and Boundaries of Participation in Organizations: A Critical Evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Disheau, D.: 1992, June 23, Sears Admits Mistakes at Auto Shops; Overhauling it’s Sales System. The Associated Press Newswire Google Scholar
  24. Durkerich J. M., Waller M. J., George E., Huber G. P. 2000. Moral Intensity and Managerial Problem Solving. Journal of Business Ethics, 24: 29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dweck C. S. 1989. Motivation. In A. Lesgold, R. Glaser (eds.), Foundations for a Psychology of Education. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  26. Eichenwald, K.: 2002a, ‹Paid Huge Bonuses in ‹01; Experts See a Motive for Cheating,’ The New York Times March 1, A1Google Scholar
  27. Eichenwald, K.: 2002b, ‹Andersen Guilty in Effort to Block Inquiry on Enron,’ The New York Times. June 16, A1Google Scholar
  28. Elsbach K. D. 2001. The Architecture of Legitimacy: Constructing Accounts of Organizational Controversies. In J. T. Jost, B. Major (eds.), The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations (pp. 391–415). New York, NY: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Epley N., Dunning D. 2000. Feeling “Holier than thou”: Are Self-serving Assessments Produced by Errors in Self- or Social Prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 861–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Erez M. 1986. The Congruence of Goal-Setting Strategies with Socio-Cultural Values and its Effect on Performance. Journal of Management, 12: 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Erez M., Earley P. C., Hulin C. L. 1985. The Impact of Participation on Goal Acceptance and Performance: A Two-Step Model. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 50–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. C. 1985. A Contingency Framework for Understanding the Ethical Decision-making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49: 87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Festinger L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E. 1991. Social Cognition, 2nd edn. Massachusetts: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  35. Friedrich C. J. 1937. Constitutional Government and Politics. New York: Harper & BrosGoogle Scholar
  36. Gioia D. A. 1992. Pinto fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11: 379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenberg J. 1998. The Cognitive Geometry of Employee Theft: Negotiating “the line” between Taking and Stealing. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, J. M. Collins (eds.), Dysfunctional Behavior in Organizations, Vol. 2 (pp. 147–193). Stamford, CT: JAI PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Greenberg J. 2002. Who Stole the Money, and When? Individual and Situational Determinants of Employee Theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89: 985–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenspan, A.: July 16, 2002. Testimony of Chairman Alan Greenspan Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate. Federal Reserve Board’s Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress Google Scholar
  40. Higgins T. E. 1987. Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect. Psychological Review, 94: 363–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986. ‹A General Theory of␣Marketing Ethics,’ Journal of Macro Marketing Spring, 5–16Google Scholar
  42. Jackall R. 1988. Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York: OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones T. M. 1991. Ethical Decision-Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16: 366–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kahn W. A. 1990. Toward an Agenda for Business Ethics Research. Academy of Management Review, 15: 311–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanfer R., Ackerman P. L. 1989. Motivation and Cognitive Abilities: An Integration/Aptitude-Treatment Interaction Approach to Skill Acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 657–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kerr S. 1975. On the Folly or Rewarding A While Hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18: 769–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klein H. J., Wesson M. J., Hollenbeck J. R., Alge B. J. 1999. Goal Commitment and the Goal-Setting Process: Conceptual Clarification and Empirical Synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Klein H. J., Wright P. M. 1994. Antecedents of Goal Commitment: An Empirical Examination of Personal and Situational Factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24: 95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Latham G. P. 1986. Job Performance and Appraisal. In C. L. Cooper, I. T. Robertson (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley LtdGoogle Scholar
  50. Latham G. P. 2001. The Reciprocal Effects of Science on Practice: Insights from the Practice and Science of Goal-setting. Canadian Psychology, 42: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Latham G. P., Erez M., Locke E. A. 1988. Resolving Scientific Disputes by the Joint Design of Crucial Experiments by the Antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham Dispute Regarding Participation in Goal Setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 753–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Latham G. P., Marshall H. A. 1982. The Effects of Self-Set, Participatively Set and Assigned Goals on the Performance Of Government Employees. Personnel Psychology, 35: 399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Latham G. P., Steele T. P. 1983. The Motivational Effects of Participation versus Goal Setting on Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 406–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Latham G. P., Steele T. P., Saari L. M. 1982. The Effects of Participation and Goal Difficulty on Performance. Personnel Psychology, 35: 677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Latham G. P., Wexley K.N. 1981. Increasing Productivity through Performance Appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  56. Latham G. P., Winters D. C., Locke E. A. 1994. Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Participation: A Mediator Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leana C. R., Locke E. A., Schweiger D. M. 1990. Fact and Fiction in Analyzing Participation Research: A Critique of Cotton, Vellrath, Froggatt, Lengnick-Hall, and Jennings. Academy of Management Review, 15: 137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Locke E. A., Latham G. P. 1984. Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique that Works. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  59. Locke E. A., Latham G. P. 1990. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  60. Locke E. A., Schweiger D. M. 1979. Participation in Decision-making: One More Look. In B. M. Staw (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1 (pp. 265–339). Greenwich, CT: JAI PressGoogle Scholar
  61. Locke E. A., Shaw K. N., Saari L. M., Latham G. P. 1981. Goal-setting and Task Performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90: 125–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Loe T. W., Ferrell L., Mansfield P. 2000. A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision-making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25: 185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ludwig T. D., Geller E. S. 1997. Assigned versus Participative Goal Setting and Response Generalization: Managing Injury Control among Professional Pizza Deliverers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mento A. J., Steel R. P., Karren R. J. 1987. A Meta-analytic Study of the Effects of Goal-Setting on Task Performance: 1966–1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39: 52–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Milgrim, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  66. Miller K. I., Monge P. R. 1986. Participation, Satisfaction and Productivity: A Meta Analytic Review. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 727–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Minor W. W. 1981. Techniques of Neutralization: A Reconceptulaization and Empirical Examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18: 295–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mitchell R. K. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mitchell T. R. 1973. Motivation and Participation: An Integration. Academy of Management Journal, 16: 670–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Moon H. 2001. The Two Faces of Conscientiousness: Duty and Achievement Striving in Escalation of Commitment Dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 535–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. O’Fallon M. J., Butterfield K. D. 2005. A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59: 375–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rest J. R. 1986. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
  73. Robin D. P., Reidenbach R. E., Forrest P. J. 1996. The Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue as an Influence on the Ethical Decision-making of Ad Managers. Journal of Business Research, 35: 17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rothkopf E. Z., Billington M. J. 1979. Goal-Guided Learning from Text: Inferring a Descriptive Processing Model from Inspection Times and Eye Movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 310–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scott M. B., Lyman S. M. 1968. Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33: 46–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schweitzer M. E., Ordóñez L., Douma B. 2004. Goal-Setting as a Motivator of Unethical Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 422–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shalley C. E., Oldham G. R., Porac J. F. 1987. Effects of Goal Difficulty, Goal-Setting Method, and Expected External Evaluation on Intrinsic Motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shah J. Y., Friedman R., Kruglanski A. W. 2002. Forgetting all Else: On the Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 1261–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shah J. Y., Kruglanski A. W. 2002. Priming against your Will: How Goal Pursuit is Affected by Accessible Alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38: 368–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Simon H. A. 1945. Administrative Behavior. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  81. Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J., Kraft K. L. 1996. Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making of Marketing Professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36: 245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Skarlicki D. P., Folger R. 1997. Retaliation in the Workplace: The Roles of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 434–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Staw B. M., Boettger R. D. 1990. Task Revision: A Neglected Form of Work Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 534–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stevenson, R. W.: 1992, ‹Sears Ducks, Then Tries to Cover,’ The New York Times June 17, D1Google Scholar
  85. Strauss G. 1982. Workers Participation in Management: An International Perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4: 173–265Google Scholar
  86. Street M. D., Douglas S. C., Geiger S. W., Martinko M. J. 2001. The Impact of Cognitive Expenditure on the Ethical Decision-Making Process: The Cognitive Elaboration Model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100: 29–57Google Scholar
  87. Sykes G., Matza D. 1957. Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22: 664–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. 1999. Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 684–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tenbrunsel A. E., Wade-Benzoni K. A., Messick D. M., Bazerman M. H. 2000. Understanding the Influence of Environmental Standards on Judgments and Choices. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 854–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tetlock P. E., Skitka L., Boettger R. 1989. Social and Cognitive Strategies for Coping with Accountability Conformity, Complexity, and Bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 632–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Trevino L. K. 1986. Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review, 11: 601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Trevino L. K., Butterfield K. D., McCabe D. L. 2001. The Ethical Context in Organizations: Influences on Employee Attitudes, Behaviors. In J.␣Dienhart, D. Moberg, R. Duska (eds.), The Next Phase of Business Ethics: Integrating Psychology and Ethics, Vol. 3 (pp. 301–340). New York: JAI PressGoogle Scholar
  93. Trevino L. K., Youngblood S. A. 1990. Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Umphress, E., K. See, A. Barsky, C. Gogus, L. Ren and A. Coleman: 2005, ‹Be Careful What you Wish for: Goals Influencing Ethical Behavior in Organizations’, Symposium Presented at the 65th Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  95. Vaughan D. 1992. The Macro-Micro Connection in White-Collar Crime Theory. In K. Schlegel, D. Weisburd (eds.), White-Collar Crime Reconsidered (pp. 124–145). Boston: Northeastern University PressGoogle Scholar
  96. Velasquez, M. G. and C. Rosankowski: 1985, Ethics: Theory and Practice (Englewood cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall)Google Scholar
  97. Victor B., Cullen J. 1988. The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vidaver-Cohen D. 1998. Moral Climate in Business Firms: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis and Change. Journal of Business Ethics, 17: 1211–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wagner J. A. 1994. Participation’s Effects on Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration of the Research Evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19: 312–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wood R. E., Locke E. A. 1987. The Relation of Self-efficacy and Grade Goals to Academic Performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47: 1013–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wright P. M., George J. M., Farnsworth S. R., McMahan G. C. 1993. Productivity and Extra-Role Behavior: The Effects of Goals and Incentives on Spontaneous Helping. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yeager, P. C. 1986. Analyzing Corporate Offenses: Progress and Prospects. In J. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 8 (pp. 93–120). Greenwich, CT: JAIGoogle Scholar
  103. Yukl G. A., Latham G. P. 1978. Interrelationships among Employee Participation, Individual Differences, Goal Difficulty, Goal Acceptance, Goal Instrumentality, and Performance. Personnel Psychology, 31: 305–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations