Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 627–642 | Cite as

A Study of the Ethical Issues of Private Entrepreneurs Participating in Politics in China

Article

Abstract

Since the 16th National Congress of Communist Party of China (16th NCCPC) in 2002, more and more private entrepreneurs have appeared on the political arena in China. The article first describes the state of the phenomenon, and analyzes the reasons and the related ethical issues of private entrepreneurs participating in politics. For this purpose, the article begins by suggesting a framework of analyzing the ethical analysis of corporate political actions, then applies it to a case study of the phenomenon, and finally, makes some policy suggestions to the government for regulating the practice of private entrepreneurs’ involvement in politics.

Keywords

private entrepreneurs’ involvement in politics corporate political action ethics the People’s Congress political contestability 

Abbreviations

PC

the People’s Congress

CPPCC

the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference

CPC

the Communist Party of China

CPA

corporate political action

16th NCCPC

16th National Congress of Communist Party of China

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachrach P., Baratz M.: 1962, ‹Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science Review 57, 947–952Google Scholar
  2. Baron D.: 1995, ‹Integrated Strategy: Market and NonMarket Components’, California Management Review, 37(3): 47–65Google Scholar
  3. Berlin , I.: 2002, Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press, 1969. Expanded edition: Liberty, (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
  4. Blattberg C: 2000, From Pluralist to Patriotic Politics: Putting Practice First, (London: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  5. Cavanagh Gerald F., Moberg, Dennis J., Velasquez, Manucl: 1981, ‹The Ethics of Organizational Politics’, Academy of Management Review 63, 363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clawson Dan, Marvin J. Karson, Allen Kaufman: 1986, ‹The Corporate Pact for a Conservative America: A Data Analysis of 1980 Corporate PAC Donations in Sixty-Six Conservative Congressional Elections’, in Lee E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI, pp. 223–245Google Scholar
  7. Crowder G: 2002, Liberalism and Value Pluralism, (London: Continuum Books)Google Scholar
  8. Dworkin Ronald: 2000, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
  9. Eismeier Theodore J., Philip H. Pollock III: 1987. ‹The Retreat from Partisanship: Why the Dog Didn’t Bark in the 1984 Election’, in Alfred A. Marcus, Allen M. Kaufman, David R. Beam (eds.), Business Strategy and Public Policy (New York: Quorum), pp. 137–147Google Scholar
  10. Frederick William C., Post, James E., Davis, Keith: 1992, Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, and Ethics. Seventh Edition. (New York: McGraw Hill)Google Scholar
  11. Gale J., Buchholz R: 1987, ‹The Political Pursuit of Competitive Advantage: What Business Can Gain from Government’, In A. Kaufman, D. Beam (eds.), Business strategy and public (New York: Quorum), pp. 231–252Google Scholar
  12. Garrett Thomas: 1966, Business Ethics (Prentice Hall, Inc., N.J: Englewood Cliffs)Google Scholar
  13. Getz Kathleen A.: 1997, ‹SelectingCorporate Political Tactics’, in: B. M. Mitnick (ed.) Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications), pp. 242–273Google Scholar
  14. Grimaldi Jennifer: 1998, ‹Ethical Business Around The World: Ethics and the Political Activities of us Business’, Business Ethics: A European Review 7(4), 245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hillman Amy, Gerald Keim: 1995,’International Variation in the Business-Government Interface: Institutional and Organizational Considerations’, Academy of Management Review 20:193–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoberg, George, Jr. Risk: 1990, ‹Science and Politics: Alachlor Regulation in Canada and the United States’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 23(2), 227–237.Google Scholar
  17. Hamilton J. Brooke Hamilton III, David Hoch: 1997, ‹Ethical Standards for Business Lobbying: Some Practical Suggestions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 7(3), 117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keffer Jane M, Hill Ronald Paul: 1997, ‹An Ethical Approach to Lobbying Activities of Businesses in the United States’, Journal of Business Ethics 16(12/13), 1371–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keim Gerald D., Barry D. Baysinger: 1993, ‹The Efficacy of Business Political Activity: Competitive Considerations in a Principal-Agent Context’, in Barry M Mitnick (ed.), Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 125–147Google Scholar
  20. King Martin Luther Jr.:1958, Stride Toward Freedom, The Montgomery story (New York: Harper & Row)Google Scholar
  21. Lenway S., & Murtha T.: 1994, ‹The State as Strategic in International Business Research’, Journal of International Business Studies 25:513–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindblom C. E.: 1977, Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books)Google Scholar
  23. Lukes S.: 1974, Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan)Google Scholar
  24. Markowitz, Steven: 1984, ‹Ethical Rules for Corporate PAC-Men’, Business and Society Review (summer) 21–25.Google Scholar
  25. Masters Marick E, Barry D. Baysinger: 1985, ‹The Determinants of Funds Raised by Corporate Political Action Committees: An Empirical Examination’, Academy of Management Journal 28,654–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Masters Marick E, Gerald D. Keim: 1986, ‹Variation in Corporate PAC and Lobbying Activity: An Organizational and Environmental Analysis’, in Lee E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI, pp. 249–271Google Scholar
  27. Masters Marick E., Gerald D. Keim: 1985, ‹Determinants of PAC Participation among Large Corporations’, Journal of Politics 47,158–173Google Scholar
  28. Mitnick B. M.: 1993. ‹Political Contestability’, in B. M. Mitnick (ed.), Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs (Newbury Park, A: Sage)Google Scholar
  29. Mundo Philip A.: 1992. Interest Groups: Cases and Characteristics (Chicago: Nelson-Hall)Google Scholar
  30. Oberman W. D.: 2004, ‹A Framework for the Ethical Analysis of Corporate Political Activity’, Business & Society Review 109 (2), 245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oberman William D.: 1993, ‹Strategy and Tactic Choice in an Institutional Resource Context’, in Barry M. Mitnick (ed.), Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs (Newbury Park, CA: Sage), pp. 213–241Google Scholar
  32. Plotke David: 1992, ‹The Political Mobilization of Business’, in Mark P. Petracca (ed.), The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed (Boulder, CO: Westview), pp. 175–198Google Scholar
  33. Raz J: 2004, The Practice of Value, (London: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  34. Dworkin Ronald: 2000, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
  35. Santana-Melgoza Carmen, Frank Shipper, Marianne M. Jennings: 1991. ‹Toward a Theoretical Model of Corporate Political Activity and Economic Success’, in John E Mahon (ed.), International Association of Business and Society Proceedings (Boston: Boston University Press), pp. 291–317Google Scholar
  36. Spiller Pablo T.: 1990, ‹Politicians, Interest Groups, and Regulators: A Multiple-Principals Agency Theory of Regulation, or ‹Let Them Be Bribed’, Journal of Law and Economics 33, 65–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weber Leonard J.: 1996, ‹Citizenship and Democracy: The Ethic of Corporate Lobbying’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2), 253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weber Leonard J.: 1997, ‹Ethics and the Political Activity of Business: Reviewing the Agenda’, Business Ethics Quarterly 7(3), 71–79 (In Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dong Ming: 2005, ‹Comment on the Participation of Private Owner in Politics’. Journal of Parity School of C.P. C Ningpo Municipal Committee 1, 16–22Google Scholar
  40. Fan Gang: 1996, the Political Economic Analysis of Progressive Reform (Shanghai:Shanghai Far East Publishers). Google Scholar
  41. He Pengchang: 2001, ‹The Full-Time Institution and the Perfection of the Institution of People’s Congress’, People’s Congress Studying 11, 4–8Google Scholar
  42. He Qiechuan: 2003, ‹The Full-Time of the Deputy Is a Progressive Process’, People’s Congress Studying 6, 1 Google Scholar
  43. Hu Chi: 2005, ‹How should No-Pubic Economy Adapt Market Environment’, Chinese Cadres Tribune 3, 22–24Google Scholar
  44. Lu Xueyi: 2002, A Research Report on Cotemporary Chinese Social Strata (Social Sciences Academic Press).Google Scholar
  45. Qiao Xinsheng: 2003. ‹The Chinese Election Institution Should be Perfected Soon’, Renminwang (http://www.people.com.cn): Apr.21.Google Scholar
  46. The Chinese Private Enterprises Research Group: 2003, ‹A Report on the Development of China’s Private Enterprises’, Caijing Magazine 2.Google Scholar
  47. The Development and Reform Committee of the State Council, The Research Room under the State Council: 2005, ‹Sustain and Lead the Development of Non-Public Economy Unhesitatingly’, Contemporary Economy 3, 1.Google Scholar
  48. Wang Yufan, Xi Luoxi: 2003, ‹Unscramble the Phenomenon of ‹Xu Guanju’’, 21st Century Business Herald (Jan. 29)Google Scholar
  49. Wu Jinglian: 2002, ‹Radically Reform, Distinguish Wrong and Right: on Guard Crony Capitalism’, Pioneering with Science & Technology, 2, 4–6Google Scholar
  50. Wu Jinglian: 2003, ‹Build a Market Economy of Law’, China Reform 11, 14–16Google Scholar
  51. Wu Jinglian: 2004, ‹Market Economy Should Watch Out for Crony Capitalism’, Decision and Information 1, 31–33Google Scholar
  52. Xie Xiangwei: 2003, ‹A Brief Comment on the Full-Time Deputy to National People’s Congress’, People’s Congress Studying 6, 4–7Google Scholar
  53. Xu Jialiang: 1995, ‹Separation of Powers and Combination of Legislative and Executive Powers: The Meaning of System Comparison between China and American’, Quarterly Journal of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences 2, 86–95Google Scholar
  54. Yan Kan: 2005, ‹The Survival of the Rich under Macro-Control’, New Fortune 5, 45–56Google Scholar
  55. Zhang Jingping: 2004, `The Change of Power: from Government Officials’ Going into Business and Businessmen’s Participating in Politics’ (Zhejiang People’s Publishing House)Google Scholar
  56. Zhang Weiying: 2001, ‹The Bepuzzlement of Chinese Entrepreneurs’, 21st Century Business Herald (June 21), A 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementBeijing Institute of Graphic CommunicationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations