Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption

Abstract

This paper explores Albert Bandura's concept of moral disengagement in the context of organizational corruption. First, the construct of moral disengagement is defined and elaborated. Moral disengagement is then hypothesized to play a role in the initiation of corruption by both easing and expediting individual unethical decision-making that advances organizational interests. It is hypothesized to be a factor in the facilitation of organizational corruption through dampening individuals’ awareness of the ethical content of the decisions they make. Finally, it is hypothesized to contribute to the perpetuation of corruption in organizations, because if individuals who have a greater propensity to morally disengage are more likely to make decisions that advance organizational interests regardless of the ethicality of those decisions, they may also be rewarded for those decisions in terms of organizational advancement. Together these studies form an argument that moral disengagement plays an important role in processes of organizational corruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aquino, K., A. Reed, II, S. Thau and D. Freeman: 2007, ‹A Grotesque and Dark Beauty: How the Self-Importance of Moral Identity and the Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Influence Cognitive and Emotional Reactions to War’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43, 385–392

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashforth B. E., Anand V. (2003) The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 25:1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura A. (1990a) Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement. in Reich W. (ed.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, States of Mind. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–191

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bandura A. (1990b) Selective Activation and Disengagement of Moral Control. Journal of Social Issues 46:27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bandura A. (1999) Moral Disengagement in the Perpetuation of Inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3:193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bandura A. (2002) Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral agency. Journal of Moral Education 31:101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. V., Pastorelli C. (1996) Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bandura A., Caprara G. V., Barbaranelli C., Pastorelli C., Regalia C. (2001) Sociocognitive Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Governing Transgressive Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnard C. (1938) The Functions of the Executive Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  11. Batson C. D., Moran T. (1999) Empathy-Induced Altruism in a Prisoner’s Dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology 29:909–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baucus M. S. (1994) Pressure, Opportunity and Predisposition: A Multivariate Model of Corporate Illegality. Journal of Management 20:699–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Muraven M., Tice D. M. (1998) Ego Depletion: is the Active Self a Limited Resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74:1252–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bligh M. C., Kohles J. C., Meindl J. R. (2004) Charisma Under Crisis: Presidential Leadership, Rhetoric, and Media Responses Before and After the September 11th Terrorist Attacks. The Leadership Quarterly 15:211–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brief A. P., Buttram R. T., Dukerich J. M. (2001) Collective Corruption in the Corporate World: Toward a Process Model. in Turner M. E. (ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 471–499

    Google Scholar 

  16. Butterfield K. D., Trevino L. K., Weaver G. R. (2000) Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influence of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. Human Relations 53:981–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Caprara G. V., Capanna C. (2006) Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Civic-Ness. in Zsolnai L. (ed.), Interdisciplinary Yearbook of Business Ethics. New York, Peter Lang, pp. 87–98

    Google Scholar 

  18. Carroll A. B. (1975) Managerial Ethics: A Post-Watergate View. Business Horizons 18(2):75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chugh D., Bazerman M. H., Banaji M. R. (2005) Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest in Moore D. A., Cain D. M., Loewenstein G., Bazerman M. H. (eds.), Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–95

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clinard M. B. and R. Quinney: 1973, Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology, 2nd Edition (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York)

  21. Clinard M. B., Yeager P. C. (1980) Corporate Crime. New York, The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  22. Coleman, J. W.: 1989, The Criminal Elite: The Sociology of White-Collar Crime, 2nd Edition (St. Martin’s Press, New York)

  23. Cyert R., March J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dodd M. E. (1932) For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees? Harvard Law Review 45:1145–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Douglas T. (1995) Scapegoats: Transferring Blame. New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eichenwald K. (1995) Serpent on the Rock. New York, HarperBusiness

    Google Scholar 

  27. Festinger L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL, Row, Peterson

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gellerman S. W. (1986) Why “Good” Managers Make Bad Ethical Choices. Harvard Business Review 86(4):85–90

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gioia D. A. (1992) Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 11:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Harmon-Jones E. (2000) An Update on Cognitive Dissonance Theory, with a Focus on the Self. in Tesser A., Felson R. B., Suls J. M. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, pp. 119–144

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hauser, M.: 2006, Moral Minds: How Nature Designed our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Ecco Press, New York)

  32. Jackall R. (1988) Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jeter L. W. (2003) Disconnected: Deceit and Betrayal at WorldCom. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  34. Johns G. (1999) A Multi-Level Theory of Self-Serving Behaviour in and by Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jones E. E., Pittman T. S. (1982) Toward a General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation. in Suls J. (ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 231–261

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jones J. M. (1991) Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16:366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kelman H. C., Hamilton V. L. (1989) Crimes of Obedience. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kohlberg L. (1984) Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive Developmental Approach. in Kohlberg L. (ed.), Essays on Moral Development: Vol. 2. The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. San Francisco, Harper & Row, pp. 170–205

    Google Scholar 

  39. McLean B., Elkind P. (2003) The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron. New York, Portfolio

    Google Scholar 

  40. Messick D. M. (1999) Alternative Logics for Decision Making in Social Settings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39:11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mischel W. (1977) The Interaction of Person and Situation. in Magnusson D., Endler N. S. (eds.), Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 333–352

    Google Scholar 

  42. Muraven M., Tice D. M., Baumeister R. F. (1998) Self-Control as Limited Resource: Regulatory Depletion Patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74:774–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Murnighan, J. K., D. A. Cantelon and T. Elyashiv: 2001, ‹Bounded Personal Ethics and the Tap Dance of Real Estate Agency’, in J. A. Wagner, J. M. Bartunek and K. D. Elsbach (eds.), Advances in Qualitative Organizational Research, Vol. 1, (Elsevier/JAI, New York), pp. 1–40

  44. O’Fallon M. J., Butterfield K. D. (2005) A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision Making Literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics 59:375–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rest J. R. (1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  46. Robinson S. L., Greenberg J. (1998) Employees Behaving Badly: Dimensions, Determinants, and Dilemmas in the Study of Workplace Deviance. in Cooper C. L., Rousseau D. M. (eds.), Trends in Organizational Behavior. Chichester, England, UK, John Wiley & Son, pp. 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rogers, M.: 2001, A Social Learning Theory and Moral Disengagement Analysis of Criminal Computer Behavior: An Exploratory Study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Manitoba, Canada

  48. Sackett P. R., DeVore C. J. (2001) Counterproductive Behaviors at Work in Anderson N., Ones D. S., Sinagil H., Viswesvaran C. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, pp. 145–164

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schrager L. S., Short J. F. (1978) Toward a Sociology of Organizational Crime. Social Problems 25:407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schur E. M., Bedau H. A. (1974) Victimless Crimes: Two Sides of a Controversy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shah J. Y., Friedman R., Kruglanski A. W. (2002) Forgetting all Else: On the Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Shielding. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 83:1261–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Simon H. A. (1957) Models of Man. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sims R. R., Brinkmann J. (2002) Leaders as Moral Role Models: The Case of John Gutfreund at Salomon Brothers. Journal of Business Ethics 35:320–327

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sosik J. J., Avolio B. J., Jung D. I. (2002) Beneath the Mask: Examining the Relationship of Self-Presentation Attributes and Impression Management to Charismatic Leadership. Leadership Quarterly 13:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sundaram A. K., Inkpen A. C. (2004) The Corporate Objective Revisited. Organization Science 15:350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Szwajkowski E. (1985) Organizational Illegality: Theoretical Integration and Illustrative Application. Academy of Management Review 10:558–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. (1999) Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly 44:684–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. (2004) Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behaviour. Social Justice Research 17:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Tetlock P. E. (1986) A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:819–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tetlock P. E. (2000) Cognitive Biases and Organizational Correctives: Do Both Disease and Cure Depend on the Politics of the Beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly 45:293–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Thompson J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action. New York, McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  62. Trevino L. K. (1986) Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11:601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981) The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211:452–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Vardi Y., Weitz E. (2004) Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vaughn D. (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wayne S. J., Green S. A. (1993) The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior. Human Relations 46:1431–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Yeager P. C. (1986) Analyzing Corporate Offenses: Progress and Prospects. in Post J. (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Greenwich, CT, JAI, pp. 93–120

    Google Scholar 

  68. Zerbe W. J., Paulhus D. L. (1987) Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception. Academy of Management Review 12:250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celia Moore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, C. Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption. J Bus Ethics 80, 129–139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9447-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • moral disengagement
  • corruption
  • moral awareness
  • unethical decision-making
  • organizational advancement