Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 80, Issue 2, pp 237–248 | Cite as

Strategy Making and the Search for Authenticity

Article

Abstract

Recent work in the business ethics field has called attention to the promise inherent in the concept of authenticity for enriching the ways we think about core issues at the intersection of management ethics and practice, like moral character, ethical choices, leadership, and corporate social responsibility [Driver, 2006; Jackson, 2005; Ladkin, 2006]. In this paper, I aim to extend these contributions by focusing on authenticity in relation to a set of organizational processes related to strategy making; most specifically an organization’s strategic intent, arguing that these provide an ideal venue for particularising this exploration, as they represent the key processes through which an organization defines the self it aspires to be. In order to do this, I examine specifically what a shift from “business as usual” to the search for the creation of a more authentic corporate self might look like in practice, contending that such a shift offers the possibility for improving both the moral good and the business outcomes of an institution simultaneously. I conclude with assessment of the risks inherent in undertaking such a search for more authentic strategic intention in business organizations today.

Keywords

strategy authenticity collaboration Heidegger 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anton C. 2001. Selfhood and Authenticity. Albany, NY: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashforth B., Humphrey R. 1993. Emotional Labor in Service Roles: The Influence of Identity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1): 88–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avolio B., Gardner W. 2005. Authentic Leadership Development: Getting to the Root of Positive Forms of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3): 315–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bart C., Bontis N., Taggar S. 2001. A Model of the Impact of Mission Statements on Firm Performance. Management Decision. 39(1): 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benhabib S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman M. 1971. The Politics of Authenticity. London: George Allen and Unwin LtdGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyle D. 2003. Authenticity. London: FlamingoGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgelman R. 1983. A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8(1): 61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper C., Scandura T., Schrlesheim C. 2005. Looking Forward but Learning from the Past: Potential Challenges to Developing Authentic Leadership Theory and Authentic Leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3): 475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Czikszentmihalyi M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper PerennialGoogle Scholar
  11. David F., David F. 2003. ‘It’s Time to Redraft your Mission Statement. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(1): 11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darey N. 1999. Art, Religion, and the Hermeneutics of Authenticity. In: Kemal S., Gaskell I. (eds.). Performance and Authenticity in the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Driver M. 2006. Beyond the Stalemate of Economics Versus Ethics: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Discourse of the Organizational Self. Journal of Business Ethics. 66(4): 337–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eccles R., Nohria N. 1992. Beyond the Hype. Boston: Harvard Business School pressGoogle Scholar
  15. Erickson, R.: 1995, ‘The Importance of Authenticity for Self and Society’, Symbolic Interaction, 18(2): 121–144 (University of California Press, Berkeley)Google Scholar
  16. Fine G. 2004. Everyday Genius: Self-taught Art and the Culture of Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritz R. 1989. The Path of Least Resistance. New York: Fawcett ColumbineGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman R. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: PitmanGoogle Scholar
  19. Fromm, E.: 1947, Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics (Fawcett premier Books, Greenwich, CT)Google Scholar
  20. Gilligan C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Goffee, R. and G. Jones: 2005, ‘Managing Authenticity: The Paradox of Great Leadership’, Harvard Business Review 83, 86–97Google Scholar
  22. Goffman E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamel, G. and C. Prahalad: 1989, ‘Strategic Intent’, Harvard Business Review 67, 63–76Google Scholar
  24. Hamel G., Prahalad C. 1994. Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Hardt H. 1993. Authenticity, Communication, and Critical Theory. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10: 49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harter, S.: 2002, ‘Authenticity’, in C. Snyder and S. Lopez (eds.), The Handbook of Positive Psychology, Vol. 27 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), pp. 382–393Google Scholar
  27. Hartman J. 2002. Scars of the Spirit: The Struggle Against Inauthenticity. New York: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  28. Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time (J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Trans.) (Harper Collins, San Francisco)Google Scholar
  29. Held V. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Helm B. 2001. Emotional Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Hendry C. 1996. Understanding and Creating Whole Organizational Change Through Learning Theory. Human Relations 49(5): 621–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hochschild A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Huxtable A. 1997. The Unreal America. New York: The New PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Jackson K. 2005. Towards Authenticity: A Sartrean Perspective on Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 58: 307–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemal S., Gaskell I. 1999. Performance and Authenticity in the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Ladkin D. 2006. When Deontology and Utilitarianism Aren’t Enough: How Heidegger’s Notion of “Dwelling” Night Help Organizational Leaders Resolve Ethical Issues. Journal of Business Ethics. 65: 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liedtka J. 2006. Is Your Strategy a Duck?. Journal of Business Strategy 27(5):32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liedtka J., Rosenblum J. 1996. Shaping Conversations: Making Strategy, Managing Change. California Management Review 39(1):141–157Google Scholar
  39. MacCannell, D.: 1976, 1999, The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class (University of California Press, Berkeley)Google Scholar
  40. Maslow, A.: 1968, Toward a Psychology of Being, 2nd edition (Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY)Google Scholar
  41. Miller W. 2003. Faking it. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Mintzberg H. 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  43. Mintzberg H., Waters J. 1985. Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3): 257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nash, L.: 1995, ‘The Real Truth about Corporate ‘‘Values’’’, The Public Relations Strategist (Summer), 7–13Google Scholar
  45. Painter-Morland, M.: 2006, ‘Strategy and Authenticity’, presented at the Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  46. Pfeffer J., Sutton R. 1999. Knowing ‘What’ to do is not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action. California Management Review 42(1): 83–108Google Scholar
  47. Peterson R. 2005. In Search of Authenticity. Journal of Management Studies 42(5): 1083–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pine B., Gilmore J. 1999. The Experience Economy: Work is Theater & Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  49. Porter M. 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  50. Pugmire, D.: 1998, Rediscovering Emotion (Edinburgh University Press)Google Scholar
  51. Rose R., Wood S. 2005. Paradox and the Consumption of Authenticity Through Reality Television. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2): 284–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salmela M. 2005. ‘What is Emotional Authenticity?. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 35(3): 209–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sartre, J. P.: 1956, Being and Nothingness (H.E. Barnes, Trans.) (Grammercy Books, New Jersey)Google Scholar
  54. Senge P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  55. Senge P., Scharmer O., Jaworski J., Flowers B. 2004. Presence. Cambridge, MA: SoL PublishingGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor C. 1991. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Trilling L. 1972. Sincerity & Authenticity. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Wright J. 2002. Mission and Reality and Why Not?. Journal of Change Management 3(1): 30–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Darden Business SchoolUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations