Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Study on Ethically Problematic Selling Methods in China with a Broaden Concept of Gray-marketing

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper expands the definition of gray-marketing to include some ethically problematic marketing activities and techniques used in personal selling in China. Based on this, a conceptual model of gray-marketing for a particular type of selling in which both the sellers and the buyers exhibit problematic ethics in an exchange and the associated hypotheses are developed and tested. The findings show that, first, the respondents have different ethical evaluations of different marketing practices used in personal selling such as giving and accepting gifts, buying and accepting meals, and offering and accepting kickbacks. Some of these practices may not be considered unethical. Second, in terms of ethical assessment, gray-marketing practiced by buying agents is more unacceptable than when practiced by sales agents. Third, a person’s ethical evaluation of gray-marketing behavior, empathy for gray-marketing, and belief that gray-marketing has serious consequences, significantly affects his inclination to use gray-marketing. This paper concludes with a discussion of some possible applications of our research findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antia K. D, Bergen M., Dutta S. (2004) ‚Competing with Gray Markets’, MIT Sloan Management Review 41:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunthanes W., Tansuhaj P., Lemak D. J. (1994) ‚Cross-Cultural Business Gift Giving’, International Marketing Review 11(4):44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R. P. (1974) ‚Marketing as an Organized Behavioral System of Exchange’, Journal of Marketing 38(October):77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R. P. (1975) ‚Marketing as Exchange’, Journal of Marketing 39(October):32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird M. M. (1989) ‚Gift-Giving, Gift-Taking in Industrial Companies’, Industrial Marketing Management 18(2):91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan A. K. K., Denton L. T., Tsang A. S. L. (2003) ‚The Art of Gift Giving in China’, Business Horizons 46(4):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H. L. (2002) ‚Gray-marketing and Unfair Competition’, Atlantic Economic Journal 30(2):196–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chonko L. B., J. F. Tanner W. A. Weeks (1996) ‚Ethics in Salesperson Decision Making: A Synthesis of Research Approach and an Extension of the Scenario Method’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 16(1):35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman L. J., Militello J. (1995) ‚Gray-marketing’, Health Marketing Quarterly 12(3):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross J., Stephans J., Benjamin R. E. (1990) ‚Gray Markets: A Legal Review and Public Policy Perspective’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 9:83–191

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza C. (2003) ‚An Influence of Gift-Giving within Asian Business Culture’, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 15(1/2):27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsk A. J, Gwin J. M. (1981) ‚Business Ethics: Buyers and Sellers’, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 17(Winter):9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky A. J., Jolson M. A., Kotabe M., Lim C. U. (1991) ‚A Cross-National Investigation of Industrial Salespeople’s Ethical Perceptions’, Journal of International Business Studies 4:651–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhan D. F. (1988) ‚Gray Markets and the Legal Status of Parallel Importation’, Journal of Marketing 52(3):73–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee T. W., Smith N. C., Ross W. T. (1999) ‚Social Contracts and Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Marketing 63(July):14–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C, Gresham L. G. (1985) ‚A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing”, Journal of Marketing 45(Summer):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty W. H., Sims H. P. (1979) ‚Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3):331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty W. H., Sims H. P. (1978) ‚Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4):451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt E. D., Siguaw J. A., Hunt T. G. (1995) ‚Business Ethics and Job-Related Constructs: A Cross Cultural Comparison of Automotive Salespeople’, Journal of Business Ethics 14:235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S. D., Vitell S. J. (1986) ‚A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6(Spring):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S. D., Vitell S. J. (1993) ‚A General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision’. In: N. C. Smith J. A. Ouelch (eds), Ethics in Marketing, Irwin, Boston, pp. 775–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz S. L., Shim S., Gehrt K. C. (2003) ‚A Study of Japanese Consumers’ Cognitive Hierarchies in Formal and Informal Gift-Giving Situations’, Psychology and Marketing 20(1):59–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S. Y. (1998) ‚A Comparison of Korean and American Gift-Giving Behaviors’, Psychology and Marketing 15(6):577–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClaren N. (2000) ‚Ethics in Personal Selling and Sales Management: A Review of the Literature Focusing on Empirical Findings and Conceptual Foundations’, Journal of Business Ethics 27(3):285–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norusis M. (1997) SPSS 7.5: Guide to Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Tull D. S., Hawlins DI (1980) Marketing Research: Measurement and Method. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Wotruba T. R. (1990) ‚A Comprehensive Framework for the Analysis of Ethical Behavior, with a Focus on Sales Organizations’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 10(2):29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins S. P., Coulter M. (1999) Management, 6th ed. Prentice Hall, NJ, pp 489–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudelius W., Buchholz R. A. (1979) ‚What Industrial Purchasers See as Key Ethical Dilemmas?’. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 15(4):2–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from National Natural Foundation of China Programs (No. 70672055 and No. 70121001) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Management, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xian, 710049, The People’s Republic of China

    Guijun Zhuang

  2. Department of Marketing, Hong Kong Baptist University, Renfrew Road, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

    Alex S. L. Tsang

Authors
  1. Guijun Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex S. L. Tsang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guijun Zhuang.

Additional information

Both authors contributed equally to this work.

Guijun Zhuang (Ph.D., City University of Hong Kong) is a professor of marketing in the School of Management, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, the People’s Republic of China. His current research interests include marketing channel behaviors, relationship marketing, and consumer choice. He has published in European Journal of Marketing, Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, and many leading marketing and management journals in China.

Alex S.L. Tsang (Ph.D., City University of Hong Kong) is an assistant professor at the Department of Marketing, Hong Kong Baptist University. His research currently focuses on cross-cultural consumer behavior, marketing in China, and marketing communication. He has published in Journal of Business Research, European Journal of Marketing, and Business Horizons, among others.

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix: Instrument

In the following situations, please express your opinions of Mr. Lee and Mr. Liu’s behavior. (“1” = strongly disagree and “7” = strongly agree)

S1: Kickbacks. Mr. Lee is the purchasing manager for Firm A. Mr. Liu is a sales agent for Firm B. Firm A had a big order for purchasing raw materials. To get the order, Mr. Liu gave Mr. Lee a kickback of 5% of the price of the order. The order should have been given to Firm C, but because of the kickback, Mr. Lee gave the order to Firm B.

On Mr. Lee’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Lee’s behavior is unethical

  2. 2.

    Mr. Lee’s is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Lee’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

4. If I were Mr. Lee, I would have done the same.

On Mr. Liu’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is unethical.

  2. 2.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  4. 4.

    If I were Mr. Liu, I would have done the same.

S2: Giving gifts in advance. Mr. Lee is the purchasing manager for Firm A. Mr. Liu is a sales agent for Firm B. Firm A had a purchase order for raw materials. To get the order, Mr. Liu sent Mr. Lee a large sum of money on his birthday as a gift. Mr. Lee took it and did not return it.

On Mr. Lee’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Lee’s behavior is unethical

  2. 2.

    Mr. Lee’s is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Lee’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  4. 4.

    If I were Mr. Lee, I would have done the same.

On Mr. Liu’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is unethical.

  2. 2.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  4. 4.

    If I were Mr. Liu, I would have done the same.

S3: Giving gifts afterwards. Mr. Lee is the purchasing manager for Firm A. Mr. Liu is a sales agent for Firm B. Representing Firm A, Mr. Lee gave a big purchase order for raw materials to Firm B, represented by Mr. Liu. Mr. Liu, in order to thank Mr. Lee sent him a birthday gift of a large sum of money. Mr. Lee received the gift and did not return it.

On Mr. Lee’s behavior

  • 1. Mr. Lee’s behavior is unethical

  • 2. Mr. Lee’s is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  • 3. Mr. Lee’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  • 4. If I were Mr. Lee, I would have done the same.

On Mr. Liu’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is unethical.

  2. 2.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  4. 4.

    If I were Mr. Liu, I would have done the same.

S4: Giving gifts to relatives. Mr. Lee and Mr. Liu are relatives. In order to get a business order, Firm B asked Mr. Liu, to send a large sum of money to Mr. Lee for his birthday. Mr. Lee took the gift and did not return it.

On Mr. Lee’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Lee’s behavior is unethical

  2. 2.

    Mr. Lee’s is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Lee’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  4. 4.

    If I were Mr. Lee, I would have done the same.

On Mr. Liu’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is unethical.

  2. 2.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  4. 4.

    If I were Mr. Liu, I would have done the same.

S5: Buying meals. Mr. Lee is the purchasing manager for Firm A. Mr. Liu is a sales agent for Firm B. Representing Firm A, Mr. Lee gave a big purchasing order to Firm B, represented by Mr. Liu. Mr. Liu, in order to thank Mr. Lee for the order, invited Mr. Lee to an expensive dinner. Mr. Lee went.

On Mr. Lee’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Lee’s behavior is unethical

  2. 2.

    Mr. Lee’s is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Lee’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  4. 4.

    If I were Mr. Lee, I would have done the same.

On Mr. Liu’s behavior

  1. 1.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is unethical.

  2. 2.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior is not appropriate, but it is understandable.

  3. 3.

    Mr. Liu’s behavior will be discovered. He will be severely punished.

  4. 4.

    If I were Mr. Liu, I would have done the same.

I am a person with high morals. (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = barely disagree, 4 = no comment, 5 = barely agree, 6 = agree, 7 = strongly agree)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhuang, G., Tsang, A.S.L. A Study on Ethically Problematic Selling Methods in China with a Broaden Concept of Gray-marketing. J Bus Ethics 79, 85–101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9397-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9397-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation