Skip to main content
Log in

Compliance with Mandatory Environmental Reporting in Financial Statements: The Case of Spain (2001–2003)

  • Accounting & Finance
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate, Social, Ethical and Environmental Reporting (SEER) should ideally discharge the accountability of an organisation to its stakeholders. Voluntary reporting has been characterised by a dearth of neutral and objective information such that the advocates of SEER recommend that it be made compulsory. Their underlying rationale is that legally specified disclosure requirements and enforcement mechanisms will enhance the quality of such reporting. This paper sets out to explore how realistic this scenario actually is, in view of the conflicting interpretations in the literature on this subject. To that end, a survey of the reporting patterns of 78 of the largest Spanish companies between 2001 and 2003 examines the extent of their compliance with the ICAC-2002 standard, which obliged them to make environmental disclosures in their financial statements. The results suggest that progressive and improved regulation could increase the volume and quality of SEER disclosures. They also suggest, however, that persistent non-compliance means that the problems associated with voluntary disclosure still exist. Finally, through an impression management perspective, the study reveals, the diverse strategies, ranging from dismissal to concealment, that are employed by companies to avoid transparency. As regulation improves and enforcement expectations rise, it becomes more difficult to dismiss compulsory reporting norms. As a result, some firms engage in more complex concealment strategies to attain corporate legitimacy, depriving stakeholders of regulatory information. The latter point serves to reconcile apparently contradictory explanations in the literature as to whether legitimacy theory might explain partial compliance with SEER regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott W. F., R. J. Monsen: 1979, On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement, Academy of Management Journal 22(3), 501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams C. A.: 2004, The ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting-Performance Gap, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams C. A., N. Kuasirikun: 2000, A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Reporting on Ethical Issues by UK and German Chemical and Pharmaceutical Companies, The European Accounting Review 9(1), 53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams C. A., A. Coutts, G. Harte: 1995, Corporate Equal Opportunities (Non-) Disclosure, British Accounting Review 27(2), 87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alciatore M. L., C. C. Dee: 2006, Environmental Disclosures in the Oil and Gas Industry. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 3, 49–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archel P.: 2003, La divulgación de la información social y medioambiental de la gran empresa española en el período 1994–1998: situación actual y perspectivas, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 33(117), 571–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington J.: 1999, Compulsory Environmental Reporting in Denmark: An Evaluation, Social and Environmental Accounting, 19(2), 2–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington J., E. Kirk, C. Larrinaga: 2003, A Regime Theory Perspective on Regulating Environmental Reporting, Accountability Quarterly, 2003, 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown N., C. Deegan: 1998, The Public Disclosure of Environmental Performance Information – A Dual Test of Media Agenda Setting Theory and Legitimacy Theory, Accounting and Business Research 29(1), 21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D.: 2003, Intra – and Intersectorial Effects in Environmental Disclosures: Evidence for Legitimacy Theory, Business Strategy and the Environment. 12, 357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C., C. Blomquist: 2006, Stakeholder Influence on Corporate Reporting: An Exploration of the Interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian Minerals Industry, Accounting, Organizations and Society 31(4/5), 343–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dando N., T. Swift: 2003, Transparency and Assurance Minding the Credibility Gap, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day R., T. Woodward: 2004, Disclosure of Information about Employee in the Directors’ Report of UK Published Financial Statements: Substantive or Symbolic? Accounting Forum 28(1), 43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C.: 2002, The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(3), 282–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C., M Rankin: 1997, The Materiality of Environmental Information to Users of Annual Reports, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10(4), 562–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C., B. Gordon: 1996, A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations, Accounting and Business Research 26(3), 187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C., M. Rankin: 1996, Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Protection Authority, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(2), 50–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C., M. Rankin, J. Tobin: 2002, An Examination of the Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997. A Test of Legitimacy Theory, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne K. B., L. W. Lewis: 2005, The Pragmatic and Ethical Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Nike Case, Journal of Business Ethics 60, 359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar B., J. M. González 2006 Responsabilidad social corporativa: ¿compromiso u oportunismo? Revista de Contabilidad 8(16):67–98

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: 2001, Recommendation of 30 May 2001 on the Recognition, Measurement and Disclosure of Environmental Issues in the Annual Accounts and Annual Reports of Companies (2001/453/EC)

  • Freedman M., D. Patten: 2004, Evidence of the Pernicious Effect of Financial Report Environmental Disclosure, Accounting Forum 28(1), 27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman M., A. J. Stagliano: 2002, Environmental Disclosure by Companies Involved in Initial Public Offerings, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(1), 94–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Ayuso M., C. Larrinaga: 2003, Environmental Disclosure in Spain: Corporate Characteristics and Media Exposure, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad 115, 184–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R.: 1992, Accounting and Environmentalism: An Exploration of the Challenge of Gently Accounting for Accountability, Transparency and Sustainability, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 399–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R.: 2006a, “Does Sustainability Reporting Improve Corporate Behaviour? Wrong Question? Right Time?” Accounting and Business Research 36(4)

  • Gray R.: 2006b, Social, Environmental and Sustainability Reporting and Organisational Value Creation? Whose Value? Whose Creation? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R., D. L. Owen, C. A. Adams: 1996, Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. (Prentice Hall: London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R., D. L. Owen, K. T. Maunders: 1987, Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and Accountability. (Prentice Hall International, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R., K. Reza, S. Lavers: 1995, Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by UK Companies, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2), 78–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, D. L. Owen, K. T. Maunders: 1988, Corporate Social Reporting: Emerging Trends in Accountability and the Social Contract, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1(1), 6–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackston D., M. Milne: 1996, Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 9(1), 77–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbitt C., D. Collison: 2004, Corporate Environmental Disclosure and Reporting Developments in Europe, Social and Environmental Accounting Journal 24(1), 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghiemstra R: 2000, Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting, Journal of Business Ethics 27(1/2), 55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels H., D. Timmer: 2004, Investors in Need of Social, Ethical, and Environmental Information, Journal of Business Ethics 52, 73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram R., K. Frazier: 1980, Environmental Performance and Corporate Disclosure, Journal of Accounting Research 18, 612–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones M. J., P. A. Shoemaker: 1994, Accounting Narratives: A Review of Empirical Studies of Content and Readability, Journal of Accounting Literature 13, 142–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A.: 2005, Environmental Reporting by Multinationals from the Triad: Convergence or Divergence? Management International Review, 45, 145–166

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG Global Sustainability Services and University of Amsterdam Graduate Business School (2005), KPMG International Survey of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting 2005, Amsterdam

  • Krippendorff K.: 1980, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (Sage, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuasirikun N., N. Sherer: 2004, Corporate Social Accounting Disclosure in Thailand, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 17(4), 629–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrinaga C., F. Carrasco, C. Correa, F. Llena, J. M. Moneva: 2002, Accountability and Accounting Regulation: The Case of the Spanish Environmental Disclosure Standard, The European Accounting Review 11(4), 723–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llena F., J. M. Moneva, B. Hernandez: 2007, Environmental Disclosures and Compulsory Accounting Standards: The Case of Spanish Annual Reports, Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(1), 50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne M. J., R. W. Adler: 1999, Exploring the Reliability of Social and Environmental Disclosures Content Analysis, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobus J. L.: 2005, Mandatory Environmental Disclosures in a Legitimacy Theory Context, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 18(4), 492–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneva J. M., F. Llena: 2000, Environmental Disclosures in the Annual Reports of Large Companies in Spain, The European Accounting Review 9(1), 7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu D., H. Warsame, D. Pedwell: 1998, Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports, Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(3), 265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan G.: 2002, Environmental Disclosures in the Annual Report: Extending the Applicability and Predictive Power of Legitimacy Theory, Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(3), 344–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer B.: 2002), Managerial Perceptions of Corporate Social Disclosure: An Irish Story, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C.: 1991, Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes, Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen D., R. Gray, J. Bebbington: 1997, Green Accounting: Cosmetic Irrelevance of Radical Agenda for Change, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting 4(2), 175–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten D. M.: 1991, Exposure, Legitimacy and Social Disclosure, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10(4), 297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten D. M.: 1992, Intra-Industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5), 471–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten D. M.: 2005, The Accuracy of Financial Report Projections of Future Environmental Capital Expenditures: A Research Note; Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real Decreto 437/1998 de adaptación del Plan General de Contabilidad a las empresas del sector eléctrico

  • Resolución del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas de 25 de marzo de 2002 por la que se aprueban normas para el reconocimiento, valoración e información de los aspectos medioambientales en las cuentas anuales

  • Unerman J.: 2000, Methodological Issues – Reflections on Quantification in Corporate Social Reporting Content Analysis, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 13(5), 667–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warsame H, D Neu, C. V. Simmons: 2002, Reporting to Discrediting Events: Annual Report Disclosure Responses to Environmental Fines, Accounting and Public Interes, 2, 22–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman J.: 1982, An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosure Made in Corporate Annual Reports, Accounting, Organizations and Society 7, 53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zéghal D., S. A. Ahmed: 1990, Comparison of Social Responsibility Information Disclosure Media used by Canadian Companies, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 3(1), 38–53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Fernández-Chulián.

Additional information

Irene Criado-Jiménez is a Doctoral Candidate at the Departamento de Economía y Administración de Empresas, Universidad de Burgos. Her research interests include accounting for sustainable development and corporate accountability.

Manuel Fernández-Chulián is a Doctoral Candidate at the Departamento de Economía y Administración de Empresas, Universidad de Burgos. His research interests include sustainability reporting and full cost accounting.

Francisco Javier Husillos-Carqués is Assistant at the Departamento de Gestión de Empresas, Universidad Pública de Navarra and a Doctoral Candidate at the Universidad de Burgos. His research interests include social and environmental reporting and environmental management.

Carlos Larrinage-González is Associate Professor at the Departamento de Economía y Administración de Empresas, Universidad de Burgos. His research interests include social and environmental accounting. He writes for interdisciplinary journals in accounting. He has co-edited special issues in European Accounting Review and Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal and currently is an Associate Editor of the Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Criado-Jiménez, I., Fernández-Chulián, M., Larrinaga-González, C. et al. Compliance with Mandatory Environmental Reporting in Financial Statements: The Case of Spain (2001–2003). J Bus Ethics 79, 245–262 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9375-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9375-7

Keywords

Navigation