This paper addresses the criticism recently directed at Internet companies who have chosen to do business in China. Currently, in order to conduct business in China, companies must agree to the Chinese government’s rule of self-censoring any information the government deems inappropriate. We start by explaining how some of these companies have violated the human rights of Chinese citizens to freely trade information. We then analyze whether the justifications and excuses offered by these companies are sufficient to absolve them of moral responsibility. We argue that both justifications and excuses offered are insufficient. Wilfully abiding by unjust laws, albeit necessary to do business in China, should not trump moral actions that protect rights.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Amnesty International. 2006 Undermining Freedom of Expression in China: The Role of Yahoo!, Microsoft, and Google. Amnesty International, London, UK
Austin J. L. 1991, ‘A Plea for Excuses’, in Peter A. French (ed.), The Spectrum of Responsibility. (St. Martin’s Press, New York)
Cohen A. 2004 Must Rights Impose Enforceable Positive Duties? Journal of Social Philosophy 35:264–276
De George R. 1993 Competing With Integrity in International Business. Oxford University Press, New York
Donaldson T. 1989 The Ethics of International Business. Oxford University Press, New York
Epstein R. 2003 Skepticism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Fishman Ted. 2005 China, Inc. Scribner, New York
French, P.: 1991, ‹The Corporation as a Moral Person’, in Peter French (ed.), The Spectrum of Responsibility. (St. Martins, New York)
Friedman M. 1962 Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Guo L.: 2005, ‹Surveying Internet Usage and Impact in Five Chinese Cities.’ (The CASS Internet Report 2005) Research Center for Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing
Guthrie D. 2006 China and Globalization. Routledge, New York
Gutmann E. 2004 Losing the New China. Encounter Books, San Franciso
Human Rights Watch: 2006, ‚Race to the Bottom’ Corporate Complicity in Chinese Internet Censorship. (Human Rights Watch, New York)
Jones D. H. 1999 Moral Responsibility in the Holocaust. Rowman & Littlefield, New York
Lomasky L. 1987 Persons, Rights and the Moral Community. Oxford University Press, New York
Machan T. 1999 Introduction: Norms of Business Abroad. In T. Machan (eds.), Business Ethics in the Global Market. Hoover Institution Press, Stanford
Narveson J. 2002 Respecting Persons in Theory and Practice. Rowman & Littlefield, New York
Orend B. 2002 Human Rights. Broadview Press, Peterborough Ontario
Pfeiffer R. S. 1995 Why Blame the Organization?. Littlefield Adams Books, Lanham, Maryland
Sabini J., Silver M. 1982 Moralities of Everyday Life. Oxford University Press, New York
Santoro M. 2000 Profits and Principles: Global Capitalism and Human Rights in China. Ithaca, Cornell University Press
Shafer-Landau R. 1995 Specifying Absolute Rights. Arizona Law Review 37: 209–24
Sen, A. 1999 Human Rights and Asian Values. In Tibor Machan (ed.), Business Ethics in the Global Market. Hoover Institution Press, Stanford
Shenkar O. 2005 The Chinese Century. Wharton School Publishing. Upper Saddle River NJ
Shue H. 1996 Basic Rights, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Sumner L. W. 2004 The Hateful and the Obscene. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
“This is not something we did enthusiastically, or not something that we are proud of at all.”– Elliot Schrage answering questions from Congress regarding Google’s decision to censor its Internet searches in China
Neil Haddow is currently finishing his PhD in philosophy at the University of Waterloo. His interests are moral and political philosophy at the theoretical and applied levels. He is the co-author of another paper forthcoming in The Journal of Business Ethics on age discrimination and automobile insurance.
G. Elijah Dann presently lectures for the Department of Philosophy at the University of Toronto. He is author of After Rorty: The possibilities for ethics and religious belief (Continuum Press, 2006), and is editor of a forthcoming book on Christianity entitled, Leaving Fundamentalism (Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2007).
About this article
Cite this article
Dann, G.E., Haddow, N. Just Doing Business or Doing Just Business: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the Business of Censoring China’s Internet. J Bus Ethics 79, 219–234 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9373-9
- corporate responsibility
- ‘Don’t be Evil’
- Internet censorship