Abstract
We re-examine the construct of Moral Hypocrisy from the perspective of normative self-interest. Arguing that some degree of self-interest is culturally acceptable and indeed expected, we postulate that a pattern of behavior is more indicative of moral hypocrisy than a single action. Contrary to previous findings, our results indicate that a significant majority of subjects (N = 136) exhibited fair behavior, and that ideals of caring and fairness, when measured in context of the scenario, were predictive of those behaviors. Moreover, measures of Individualism/Collectivism appear more predictive of self-interested behavior than out-of-context responses to moral ideals. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Batson D. (1994) Why Act for the Public Good? Four Answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin the Self and the Collective 20(5): 603–610
Batson D., Collins P. et al. (2006) Doing Business After the Fall: The Virtue of Moral Hypocrisy. Journal of Business Ethics 66(2): 321–335
Batson D., Kobrynowicz D. et al. (1997) In a Very Different Voice: Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(6): 1335–1348
Batson D., Thompson E. R. (2001) Why Don’t Moral People Act Morally? Motivational Considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10(2): 54–57
Batson D., Thompson E. R. et al. (2002) Moral Hypocrisy: Addressing Some Alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(2): 330–339
Batson D., Thompson E. R. et al. (1999) Moral Hypocrisy: Appearing Moral To Oneself Without Being So. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(3): 525–537
Berkowitz L., Lutterman K. (1968) The Traditionally Socially Responsible Personality. Public Opinion Quarterly 32:169-185
Carpendale J., Krebs D. (1992) Situational Variation in Moral Judgment: In a Stage or On a Stage? Journal of Youth and Adolescence 21(2): 203–224
Carpendale J., Krebs D. (1995) Variations in Level of Moral Judgment As a Function of Type of Dilemma And Moral Choice. Journal of Personality 63(2): 289–313
Cosmides L. Tooby J. (2005) Neurocognitive Adaptations Designed for Social Exchange. In: D. Buss (eds), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Wiley, NY, 584–627
Darley J. (1992) Social Organization for the Production of Evil. Psychological Inquiry 3(2): 199–218
DuGay P. (2005) Which is the ‚Self’ in ‚Self-Interest’? The Sociological Review 53(3): 391–411
Elkind P., McLean B. (2004) The Smartest Guys in the Room. New York, Knopf
Etzioni A. (1988) The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York, Free Press
Ford M., Lowry C. (1986) Gender Differences in Moral reasoning: A Comparison of the Use of Justice and Care Orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(6): 777–783
Frank R. (1988) Passions with Reason: The Strategic Role of Emotions. New York, Norton Publishers
Gilligan C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
Hastings P., Zahn-Waxler C. et al. (2006) We Are, By Nature, Moral Creatures: Biological Bases of Concern for Others. In: M. Killen, J. Smetana (eds), Handbook of Moral Development, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, 483–516
Hofstede G. (1984) The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept. Academy of Management Review 9(3): 389–398
Kant, I.: 1784/1990, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Moral (MacMillan, New York)
Kohlberg L. (1976) Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-developmental Approach. In: Lickona T. (eds.), Moral Development and Behaviour: Theory, Research , and Social Issues, Holt Rinehart, Winston, New York pp. 31-53
Kohlberg L. (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development. San francisco, CA, Harper & Row
Krebs D. L., Denton K. L. et al. (1991) Structured Flexibility of Moral Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61(6): 1012–1023
Meglino B., Korsgaard M. (2004) Considering Rational Self-Interest as a Disposition: Organizational Implications of Other Orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(6): 946–959
Miller D. (1999) The Norm of Self Interest. American Psychologist 54:1053-1060
Miller D., Prentice D. (1994) Collective Errorsand Errors about the Collective. Personality and Social Psycology Bulletin 20:541-550
Paulhus D. (1991), Measurement and Control of Response Bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, L. S. Wrightsman (eds), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 17–59
Ratner R., Miller D. (2001) The Norm of Self-Interest and It’s effects on Social Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(1): 5–16
Rawls J. (1971). Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
Rest J., Narvaez D. et al. (1999) Post-conventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mawah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbuam
Rest J., Thoma S., Edwards L. (1997) Designing and Validating a Measure of Moral Judgement:Stage Preference and Stage Consistency Approaches. Journal of Educational Psycology 89(1):5-28
Rokeach M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York, Free Press
Rorty R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. London, Penquin Books
Ross W. D. (1930) The Right and the Good. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press
Schwartz S. H. (1967) Words, Deeds, and the Perception of Consequences and Responsibility in Action Situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology 10:32--42
Singelis T., Triandis H. et al. (1995) Horizontal and Vertical Measures of Individualism and Collectivism; A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement. Cross-Cultural Research 29(2): 240–275
Smith A. (1869) An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis, IN, Liberty Fund
Thompson V., Berven N. (2002) Development of an Instrument to Measure CUltural Attitudes and Behaviors Affecting Vocational Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin 45(2): 76–86
Walker L., Pitts R. (1998) Naturalistic Conceptions of Moral Maturity. Developmental Psychology 34(3): 403–419
Watson G., Bishop J. et al. (2005) Interpersonal Dimensions of Safety in the Steel Industry. Journal of Business and Psychology 19(3): 371–384
Watson, G. and S. Papamarcos: 2002, “A Social Capital Approach to Organizational Commitment.” Journal of Business and Psychology 16(4), 537–552
Watson G., Teague B. et al. (2004) Moral Hypocrisy: A Matter of Measures? International Journal of Ethics 3(4): 371–384
Wright R. (1994) The Moral Animal: Why We Are the Way We Are. New York, Vintage
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
George W. Watson received his Ph.D. from Virginia Tech, his M.B.A. from California State at Fullerton, an M.S. in Systems Management from the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, an a B.A. in Business Administration from the University of Washington, Seattle. His teaching focus is on corporate social responsibility and ethics. Dr.Watson’s current research interests include moral psychology,ethical decision making, and ideology. He has published in Business Ethics Quarterly, Business and Society, and the Journal of Business Ethics.
Farooq Sheikh received his BS in Physics from Indiana University of Pennsylvania, and his Ph.D. from Smeal College of Business, Penn State University. He is currently Assistant Professor of Operations Management, School of Business at the State University of New York at Geneseo. Dr. Sheik’s research interests include rational and behavioral models in business operations, bounded-rational behavioral models in population games, social norms, game theory and cross-disciplinary research involving behavioral models.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watson, G.W., Sheikh, F. Normative Self-Interest or Moral Hypocrisy?: The Importance of Context. J Bus Ethics 77, 259–269 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9348-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9348-2