The Unholy Alliance of Business and Science
This paper will build on a recent article appearing in the Harvard Business Review that blamed the alleged crisis in management education on the scientific model that has been adopted as the sole means of gaining knowledge about human behavior and organizations. The solution, they argue, is for business schools to realize that business management is not a scientific discipline but a profession, and deal with the things a professional education requires. We will expand on this article and discuss its implications by looking at the scientific model from a philosophical perspective and dealing with the issue of whether management is a profession. Our discussion of these issues has implications for our understanding of business in society and the design of the business school curriculum.
Keywordsmanagement education science profession
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bennis G. W., O’Toole J. (2005) How Business Schools Lost their Way. Harvard Business Review 83(5): 96–104Google Scholar
- Elhagrasey G., Harrison R., Buchholz R. (1999) Power and Pay: The Politics of CEO Compensation. Journal of Management and Governance 2: 309–332Google Scholar
- Friedman, M.: 1970 ‚The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, Sept. 13, pp. 122–126Google Scholar
- Gordon R., Howell J. (1959) Higher Education for Business. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
- Levi, A. W.: 1964 ‚Ethical Confusion and the Business Community’, in J. W. Towle (ed.), Ethics and Standards in American Business (Houghton Mifflin, Boston), pp. 20–29Google Scholar
- Pierson et al.: 1959, The Education of American Businessmen (McGraw-Hill, New York)Google Scholar
- Smith A. (2003) The Wealth of Nations. New York: Bantam ClassicsGoogle Scholar