Skip to main content
Log in

Some Thoughts on Moriarty and Moeller

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstact

In a recent paper in Business Ethics Quarterly Professor Jeffrey Moriarty (2005) asserted the relevance of political philosophy to business ethics. Moriarty asked whether “businesses ought to be run (more) like states” and argued why that might be beneficial. This paper on the contrary asserts that there are distinct disadvantages to businesses attempting to be run more like states. Specifically, it asserts that any such an attempt increases the likelihood of the re-emergence of a totalitarian society as businesses currently often act as an intermediary between the individual and the state. The paper contemplates Moeller’s ambitions in the Weimar period for the business to be run like a state and the historical outcome of those ambitions. The paper also distinguishes between two different kinds of rights and argues that different kinds of rights pertain to different sectors which preclude business being run like a state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archard D.: 1996, Should Nationalists be Communitarians. Journal of Applied Philosophy 13, 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker M. J.: 2000, Marketing Theory (Thomson Learning, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty J.: 1998, The World According to Drucker (Orion, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle A. A., G. C. Means: 1967, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaparte T. H., J. E. Flaherty (eds.): 1970, Peter Drucker – Contribution to Business Enterprise (New York University Press, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber M.: 1969, Between Man and Man (Fontana Books, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber M.: 1974, Pointing the Way (Schoken Books, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger P. L.: 1986, The Capitalist Revolution: Fifty Propositions about Prosperity, Equality, and Liberty (Basic Books, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L.: 1992, A Far Glory (Free press, New York)

  • Campbell J.: 1989, Joy in Work, German Work – The National Debate, 1800–1945 (Princeton University Press, Princeton)

    Google Scholar 

  • Canovan M.: 1994, Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought (Cambridge University Press, Melbourne)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassis Y.: 1997, Big Business: The European Experience in the Twentieth Century (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S.: 2004, The Nature of Moral Reasoning: The Framework and Activities of Ethical Deliberation, Argument, and Decision-Making (Oxford University Press, South Melbourne)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood R. G.: 1994, The Idea of History (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conan Doyle A.: 1985, The Original Illustrated Sherlock Holmes (Castle, Secaucus, New Jersey)

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Entreves M. P.: 1994, The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt (Routledge, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F.: 1939, The End of Economic Man: A Study of the New Totalitarianism (Heinemann, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F.: 1942, The Future of Industrial Man (reprinted in 1995 by Transaction Publishers, London; originally published in 1942 by The John Day Company)

  • Drucker, P. F.: 1953, ‚The Employee Society’, American Journal of Sociology (January), 358–363

  • Drucker P. F.: 1960, Concept of the Corporation, (Beacon Press, Beacon Hill)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F.: 1969, Age of Discontinuity (Heinemann, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F.: 1971, Men, Ideas & Politics (Harper and Row, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F.: 1973, Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices (Harper and Row, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F.: 1980 Adventures of a Bystander (Harper & Row, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F.: 1981, Towards the Next Economics and Other Essays (Heinemann, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F.: 1985, The Changing World of the Executive (Times Books, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P. F.: 1987, The Frontiers of Management (Heinemann, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg J.: 1999, Civil Society: The Critical History of an Idea (New York University Press, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty J. E.: 1999, Peter Drucker: Shaping the Managerial Mind (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M.: 1991, Encounter on the Narrow Ridge: A Life of Martin Buber (Paragon, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F.: 1992, The End of History and the Last Man (Avon Books, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth A.: 1982, Human Rights: Essays on Justification and Applications (University of Chicago Press, Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth A.: 1996, The Community of Rights (University of Chicago Press, Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert M.: 1987, The Holocaust: The Jewish Tragedy (Fontana, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glatzer N. N.: 1961, Franz Rosenzweig: His Life and Thought (Schoken Books, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall J.: 1988, Two Kinds of Rights in Hoffman R. J., G. A. Larue (eds.), Biblical v. Secular Ethics: The Conflict (Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York), pp. 117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F. A.: 1994, The Road to Serfdom (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C., Parker M., R. ten Bos: 2005, For Business Ethics (Routledge, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaler J.: 2000, Positioning Business Ethics in Relation to Management and Political Philosophy, Journal of Business Ethics 24, 257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley M.: 2000, A Matter of Opinion, What Tends to the General Welfare’: Governing the Workplace, Business Ethics Quarterly 10, 243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauryssens S.: 1999, The Man Who Invented The Third Reich: The Life and Times of Arthur Moeller van den Bruck (Sutton Publishing, Phoenix Mill)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt T.: 1970, The Living Legacy of Peter Drucker, in T. H. Bonaparte J. E., Flaherty (eds.), Peter Drucker: Contribution to Business Enterprise (New York University Press, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S.: 2005, ‚Ex-Chief of CIA Opposes Sale of Oil Firm to China’, International Herald Tribune Friday July␣15, p. 1

  • Moriarty J.: 2005, On the Relevance of Political Philosophy to Business Ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly 15, 455–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse G. L.: 1987, Germans and Jews (Wayne State University Press, Detroit)

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi K.: 1944, The Great Transformation (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojman L. P.: 2005, How Should We Live? An Introduction to Ethics (Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael D. D.: 1976, Problems of Political Philosophy (MacMillan Press, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Samar V. J.: 1999, Positive Rights and the Problems of Social Justice, Business Ethics Quarterly 9, 361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenbaum D.: 1980, Hitler’s Social Revolution (W. W. Norton & Co., New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M.: 1998, Peter Drucker and the Denial of Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1685–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M.: 2004a, Drucker and Buber: The Germanic Search for Community as the Meaning of the Modern American Corporation. Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, 5, 21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M.: 2004b, Drucker’s Communitarian Vision and Its Implications for Business Ethics, Business Ethics: A European Review, 13, 288–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott W. G.: 1992, Chester I. Barnard and the Guardians of the Managerial State (University Press of Kansas, Lawrence)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern F.: 1974, The Politics of Cultural Despair (University of California Press, Berkeley)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. and S. McGuire: 2005, ‚Terror at Rush Hour’, Newsweek 18th July, 10–19

  • Velasquez M. G.: 2006, Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (Pearson, New Jersey)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermes, P.: 1994, Buber on God and the Perfect Man (Littman, London)

  • Watkins J. L.: 1959, The 100 Greatest Advertisements: Who Wrote Them and What They Did (Dover Publications, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin D.: 1993, The Prize (Simon & Schuster, London)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Schwartz.

Additional information

Dr. Michael Schwartz is an associate professor at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. He also serves as the vice-president of the Australian Association for Professional and Applied Ethics. His research in the field of business ethics has been published in Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, the Journal of Business Ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly and Business Ethics: A European Review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwartz, M. Some Thoughts on Moriarty and Moeller. J Bus Ethics 78, 25–38 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9310-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9310-3

Keywords

Navigation