Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 115–135

The Application of Stakeholder Theory to Relationship Marketing Strategy Development in a Non-profit Organization

Article

Abstract

Non-profit (NP) organizations present complex challenges in managing stakeholder relationships, particularly during times of environmental change. This places a premium on knowing which stakeholders really matter if an effective relationship marketing strategy is to be developed. This article presents the successful application of a model, which combines Mitchell’s theory of stakeholder saliency and Coviello’s framework of contemporary marketing practices in a leading NP organization in the U.K. A cooperative enquiry approach is used to explore stakeholder relationships, dominant marketing practices, and to surface differing perceptions about the organization’s marketing strategy. Resolving these differences sets the scene for developing choices in marketing strategy for the future.

Keywords

empirical study non-profit organization relationship marketing strategy development stakeholder saliency 

References

  1. Andreasen A. R., Goodstein R. C., Wilson J. W. 2005 Transferring ‚Marketing Knowledge’ to the Nonprofit Sector. Californian Management Review 47(4):46–67Google Scholar
  2. Andreasen A. R., Kotler P. 2003 Strategic Marketing for Non-Profit Organizations, 6th edit. (Prentice Hall, NJ)Google Scholar
  3. Balmer J. M. T. 2001 Corporate Identity, Corporate Branding and Corporate Marketing: Seeing Through the Fog. European Journal of Marketing 35(3–4):249-291Google Scholar
  4. Barnes D. M. 1996 An Analysis of the Grounded Theory Method and the Concept of Culture. Qualitative Health Research 6(3):429–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergvall-Kareborn B. 2002a Enriching the Model-building Phase of Soft Systems Methodology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 19(1):27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergvall-Kareborn B. 2002b Qualifying Function in SSM Modelling – a Case Study, Systematic Practice and Action Research 15(4):309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, L. L.: 1983, ‚Emerging Perspectives on Service Marketing’, in L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostack and G. D. Upah (eds.), Proceedings of AMA (Chicago, IL), pp. 25–28Google Scholar
  8. Checkland P.. 2000 Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17:s11–s58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Checkland P., Scholes J. 1990 Soft Systems Methodology in Action. (Wiley, Chichester, UK)Google Scholar
  10. Christopher M., Payne A., Ballantyne D. 1991 Relationship Marketing. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Christopher, M., A. Payne and D. Ballantyne: 2002, Relationship Marketing: Creating Stakeholder Value, 2nd edn (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford)Google Scholar
  12. Chronicle of Philanthropy: 2003, October 27Google Scholar
  13. Coviello N., Brodie R., Danaher P., Johnston W. 2002 How Firms Relate to their Markets: An Empirical Examination of Contemporary Marketing Practices. Journal of Marketing 66(July):33-46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coviello N. E., Brodie R. J., Munro H. J. 1997 Understanding Contemporary Marketing: Development of a Classification Scheme. Journal of Marketing Management 13:501–522Google Scholar
  15. Day G. S., Montgomery D. B. 1999 Charting New Directions for Marketing. Journal of Marketing 63(Special Issue):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dee J. G. 1998 Enterprising Nonprofits. Harvard Business Review 76(1):54–66Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt K. M. 1989 Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14(4):532–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drucker P. F. 1989 What Business can Learn from Nonprofits. Harvard Business Review 67(4):88–93Google Scholar
  19. Flood R. L. 2000 A Brief Review of Peter B. Checkland's Contribution to Systemic Thinking. Systemic Practice and Action Research 13(6):723–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flood R. L., Romm N. R. (eds) 1996 Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice. (Plenum, New York)Google Scholar
  21. Frooman J. 1999 Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review 24(2):191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gallagher K., Weinberg C. B. 1991, Coping With Success: New Challenges for Nonprofit Marketing Sloan Management Review Fall 27–42Google Scholar
  23. Grönroos C. 1997 From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing – Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing. Management Decision 35(3/4):148–152Google Scholar
  24. Gruar, C.: 2005, ‚The Strategic Management of Stakeholder Relationships in a British Not for Profit (NfP) Organisation’, Unpublished doctoral thesis (Cranfield School of Management, UK)Google Scholar
  25. Gummesson E. 1999 Total Relationship Marketing: Experimenting with a Synthesis of Research Frontiers. Australasian Marketing Journal 7(1):72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King S. 1991 Brand Building in the 1990s. Journal of Marketing Management 7:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kotler P. 1979 Strategies for Introducing Marketing into Nonprofit Organizations. Journal of Marketing 43(January):37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kotler P., Armstrong G. 1999 Principles of Marketing, 8th ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 550Google Scholar
  29. Kotler P., Levy S. J. 1969 Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing 33(January):10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knox S. D., Maklan S., French P. 2005 Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting across Leading FTSE Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 61:7–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liao M.-N., Foreman S., Sargeant A. 2001 Market versus Societal Orientation in the Nonprofit Sector. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 6(3):254–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitchell R. K., Agle B. R., Wood D. J. 1997 Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4):853–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morgan R. M., Hunt S. D. 1994 The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing 58(July):20–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Munro I., Mingers J. 2002 The use of Multimethodology in Practice – Results of a survey of Practitioners. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 53(4):453–469Google Scholar
  35. Murphy B., Maguiness P., Pescott C., Wislang S., Jinwu M., Wang R. 2005 Stakeholder Perceptions Presage Holistic Stakeholder Relationship Marketing Performance. European Journal of Marketing 39(9/10):1025–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patton E., Appelbaum S. H. 2003 The Case for Case Studies in Management Research. Management Research News 26(5):60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Payne A., Holt S., Frow P. 2001 Relationship Value Management; Exploring the Integration of Employee, Customer and Shareholder Value and Enterprise Performance Models. Journal of Marketing Management 17(7/8):785–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Payne A., Ballantyne D., Christopher M. 2005 A Stakeholder Approach to Relationship Marketing Strategy. European Journal of Marketing 39(7/8):855–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Polonsky M. J. 1995 A Stakeholder Theory Approach to Designing Environmental Marketing Strategy. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 10(3):29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polonsky M. J., Schuppisser D. S. W., Beldona S. 2002 A Stakeholder Perspective for Analyzing Marketing Relationships. Journal of Market-focused Management 5(2):109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Porter M., Kramer M. 2002 The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80(12):57–68Google Scholar
  42. Shapiro B. P. 1973 Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations. Harvard Business Review September–October:123–132Google Scholar
  43. Tschirhart M. 1996 Artful Leadership: Managing Stakeholder Problems in Non-Profit Art Organizations. (Indiana University Press, Bloomington)Google Scholar
  44. Van Riel C. B. M. 1995 Principles of Corporate Communication. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ)Google Scholar
  45. Webster F. E. 1978 Management Science in Industrial Marketing. Journal of Marketing 42:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yin, R. K.: 2002, Case Study Research – Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks), Chaps. 1–4, pp. 1–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Research in MarketingCranfield School of ManagementCranfield, BedfordU.K.

Personalised recommendations