Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 25–44 | Cite as

A Content Analysis of Whistleblowing Policies of Leading European Companies

  • Harold HassinkEmail author
  • Meinderd de Vries
  • Laury Bollen
Open Access


Since the introduction of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 and several other national corporate governance codes, whistleblowing policies have been implemented in a growing number of companies. Existing research indicates that this type of governance codes has a limited direct effect on ethical or whistleblowing behaviour whereas whistleblowing policies at the corporate level seem to be more effective. Therefore, evidence on the impact of (inter)national corporate governance codes on the content of corporate whistleblowing policies is important to understand their indirect impact on whistleblowing behaviour. This study analyzes the contents of whistleblowing policies, and parts of corporate codes of conduct and codes of ethics, describing such policies of 56 leading European companies. By classifying the contents in seven categories, an exploratory framework was created. General contents often identified were: applicability to all employees, a group-wide scope and an authoritative tone. The most common general violations to report were breaches of internal policies and external regulations or laws. The more specific violations most frequently mentioned were criminal offences and dangers to health and safety or the environment. Contacts to report to were the direct or indirect supervisors, a compliance officer or a confidential “hotline” facility. A confidentiality guarantee was common and anonymous reporting was often possible, though sometimes discouraged. Protection against retaliation is stated by ensuring that retaliation will not happen, prohibiting it or making it punishable. The requirement of good faith was frequently given. Finally, investigation of the report was often guaranteed. Surprisingly little information is given on the treatment of whistleblowers reporting an unfounded complaint in good faith, or reporting a violation they were involved in. The study’s findings are most relevant to companies without a whistleblowing policy or those that intend to benchmark their policies, and to pan-European standard setters.


business ethics codes of conduct codes of ethics compliance content whistleblowing 


  1. Arnold D., L. Ponemon 1991, “Internal Auditors’’ Perceptions of Whistle-Blowing and the Influence of Moral Reasoning: An Experiment. Auditing: A Journal of Theory and Practice 10: 1–15Google Scholar
  2. Association Française des Entreprises Privées and Mouvement des Entreprises de France: 2003, The Corporate Governance of Listed Corporations, AFEP and MEDEF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett T., D. S. Cochran, G. S. Taylor 1993, The Internal Disclosure Policies of Private-Sector Employers: An Initial Look at Their Relationship to Employee Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 12: 127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brass D. J., K. D. Butterfield, B. C. Skaggs 1998, Relationships and Unethical Behaviour: A Social network Perspective. Academy of Management Review 23(1):14–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkmann, J. A. and K. Ims: 2003, ‘Good Intentions Aside: Drafting a Functionalist Look at Codes of Ethics’, Business Ethics: A European Review 12, 265–274Google Scholar
  6. Brody, R., J. Coulter and P. Mihalek 1998, ‘Whistle-Blowing: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Perceptions of U.S. and Japanese Accounting Students’, American Business Review, 14–21Google Scholar
  7. Callahan E. S., J. W. Collins 1992, Employee attitudes toward whistleblowing: Management and public policy implications. Journal of Business Ethics 11(12):939–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corporate Governance Committee (CGC) 2004, Belgian Code on Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance Committee, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. Corporate Governance Committee (CGC) 2003, The Dutch Corporate Governance Code: Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Provisions, Corporate Governance Committee, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  10. Dechert 2005, Dechert OnPoint, 19 September 2005 (Dechert, London)Google Scholar
  11. Dworkin T. M., M. S. Baucus 1998, Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowing Processes. Journal of Business Ethics 17(12): 1281–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dworkin T. M., J. P. Near 1997, A Better Statutory Approach to Whistleblowing. Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ergeneli A. 2005, A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Behavior in Business Related Dilemmas: A Comparison among Turkish, Egyptian, Kirghiz and Kazak Marketing Employees. Problems & Perspectives in Management 2: 135–147Google Scholar
  14. Eversheds: 2005, HR Euronews, September 2005 (Eversheds, London)Google Scholar
  15. Farrell B. J., D. M. Cobbin 2000, A Content Analysis of Codes of Ethics from Fifty-Seven National Accounting Organizations Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(3):180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrel O. C., L. Gresham 1985, A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49: 87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Financial Reporting Council (FRC): 2005, Scholar
  18. Financial Services Authority (FSA) 2003, The Combined Code on Corporate Governance (FSA, London)Google Scholar
  19. Financiële Telegraaf: August 12, 2005, ING Bank Schikt met in opspraak geraakie directeur Google Scholar
  20. Gaumnitz B. R., J. C. Lere 2002, Contents of Codes of Ethics of Professional Business Organizations in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 35: 35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gernon, H: 1993, ‘Discussion of an Investigation of the Reporting of Questionable Acts in an International Setting’, Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement), 104–110Google Scholar
  22. Government Commission German Corporate Governance Code (GCGC) 2002, German Corporate Governance Code, Government Commission German Corporate Governance Code, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones T. M. 1991, Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16(2): 366–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jubb P. B. 1999, Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics 21: 77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaptein M. 2004, Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say? Journal of Business Ethics 50: 13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy Van der Laan Corporate Law Group: 2005, The Dutch Corporate Governance Code (Code Tabaksblat): An Update, August 2005 (Kennedy Van der Laan, Amsterdam), found on Scholar
  27. Kjonstad B., H. Willmott 1995, Business Ethics: Restrictive or Empowering? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(6): 445–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. KPMG 2005, KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005, University of Amsterdam and KPMG Global Sustainability Services, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. Larmer R. A. 1992, Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 11(2):125–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis D. 2002 Whistleblowing Procedures at Work: What Are The Implications for Human Resource Practitioners? Business Ethics: A European Review 11(3): 202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis D. 1997, Whistleblowing at Work: Ingredients for an Effective Procedure. Human Resource Management Journal 7(4):5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindsay R. M., L. M. Lindsay, V. B. Irvine 1996 Instilling Ethical Behavior in Organizations: A Survey of Canadian Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 15(4):393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marnburg E. 2000, The Behavioural Effects of Corporate Ethical Codes: Empirical Findings and Discussion. Business Ethics A European Review 9(3):200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mesmer-Magnus J. R., C. Viswesvaran 2005, Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics 62(3): 277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miceli M. P., J. P. Near 1994, Relationships Among Value Congruence, Perceived Victimization, and Retaliation Against Whistle-blowers. Journal of Management 20(4): 773–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miceli M. P., J. P. Near 1988, Indicidual and Situational Correlates of Whistleblowing. Personnel Psychology 41: 267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ministry of Justice: 2004, Tabaksblat Code Enters into Force, 27 December 2004, 1204Tabaksblat.aspGoogle Scholar
  38. Near J. P., T. M. Dworkin 1998, Responses to Legislative Changes: Corporate Whistleblowing Policies. Journal of Business Ethics 17(14):1551–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Near J. P., T. M. Dworkin, M. P. Miceli 1993, Explaining the Whistle-Blowing Process: Suggestions from Power Theory and Justice Theory. Organization Science 4(3):393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Near J. P., Miceli M. P. 1986 Retaliation Against Whistle-blowers: Predictors and Effects. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Near J. P., M. P. Miceli 1985, Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 4: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Near J. P., M. Rehg, M. P. Miceli, J. R. Van Scotter 2004, Developing a Model of The Whistle-Blowing Process: How Does Type of Wrongdoing Affect the Process? Business Ethics Quarterly 14: 219–242Google Scholar
  43. Nitsch D., M. Baetz, J. C. Hughes 2005, Why Code of Conduct Violations go Unreported: A Conceptual Framework to Guide Intervention and Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics 57:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Dwyer B., G. Madden 2006, Ethical Codes of Conduct in Irish Companies: A Survey of Code Content and Enforcement Procedures. Journal of Business Ethics 63(3): 217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. PricewaterhouseCoopers: 2005, Protecting the Brand: The Evolving Role of Compliance Functions and the Challenges of the Next Decade Google Scholar
  46. Salem, G. R. and L. M. Franze: 2002, ‘Corporate Compliance: The Whistleblower Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002’, Insights: The Corporate and Securities Law Advisor, December 1, 2002Google Scholar
  47. Schmidt M. 2005, “Whistle Blowing” Regulation and Accounting Standards Enforcement in Germany and Europe—An Economic Perspective. International Review of Law & Economics 25(2):143–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwarz M. 2001, The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics 32:247–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sims R. R. 1991, The Institutionalization of Organizational Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 10(7): 493–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sims R. R., J. D. Brinkmann 2003, Enron Ethics (Or: Culture Matters More than Codes). Journal of Business Ethics 45(3):243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Street M. D. 1995, Cognitive moral development and organizational commitment: Two potential predictors of.... Journal of Applied Business Research 11(4): 104–110Google Scholar
  52. Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) 2005, Swiss Federal Banking Commission’s Circular on Internal Surveillance and Control: the Swiss Bankers Association Wants Made-to-Measure Solutions and not Blanket State Regulation, 3 August 2005 (Swiss Bankers Association, Basel)Google Scholar
  53. Tabaksblat, M.: 2003, Speech door de voorzitter van de commissie corporate governance, mr. Morris Tabaksblat, bij de presentatie van de definitieve versie van ‘De Nederlandse corporate governance code’, 9 December 2003Google Scholar
  54. Thomas J. Z., D. L. Miller 2005, Examining Culture’s Effect on Whistle-Blowing and Peer Reporting. Business & Society, 44(4): 462–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trevino L. K. 1986, Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of management Review 11(3):601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trevino L. K., B. A. Victor 1992, Peer Reporting of Unethical Behavior: A Social Context Perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35: 38–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. United Kingdom Parliament 1998, Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, U.K. Parliament, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. United States Congress 2002, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S. Congress, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  59. Vandekerckhove W., M. S. R. Commers 2004, Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 53: 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Es R., G. Smit 2003, Whistleblowing and Media Logic: A Case Study. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(2) 144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weaver G. R., L. K. Trevino, P. L. Cochran 1999, Corporate Ethics Practices in the Mid-1990’s: An Empirical Study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics 18(3): 283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold Hassink
    • 1
    Email author
  • Meinderd de Vries
    • 1
  • Laury Bollen
    • 1
  1. 1.Accounting and Information ManagementMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations