Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Model of Ethical Decision Making: The Integration of Process and Content

  • Value-Based Management
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a model of ethical decision making that integrates the decision-making process and the content variables considered by individuals facing ethical dilemmas. The process described in the model is drawn from Janis and Mann’s [1977, Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict Choice and Commitment (The Free Press, New York)] work describing the decision process in an environment of conflict, choice and commitment. The model is enhanced by the inclusion of content variables derived from the ethics literature. The resulting integrated model aids in understanding the complexity of the decision process used by individuals facing ethical dilemmas and suggests variable interactions that could be field-tested. A better understanding of the process will help managers develop policies that enhance the likelihood of ethical behavior in their organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brady E. N., Wheeler G. E. (1996) An Empirical Study of Ethical Predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics 15(9): 927–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer M., Gratto C., Gravander J., Tuttle M. (1987) A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 6(3): 265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson T. L. (2003) Self-Interest and Business Ethics: Some Lessons of the Recent Corporate Scandals. Journal of Business Ethics 43(4): 389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal T. E., Kennedy A. (1999) The New Corporate Cultures. Perseus, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., Dumfee T. W. (1999) When Ethics Travel: The Promise and Peril of Global Business Ethics. California Management Review 41(4): 45–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G. (1985) A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49(3): 87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G., Fraedrich J. P. (1989) A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing 9(2): 55Gȴ64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G., Fraedrich J. P. (1989) A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing 9(2): 55Gȴ64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte A. (2004) Business Ethics: A Study of the Moral Reasoning of Selected Business Managers and the Influence of Organizational Ethical Climate. Journal of Business Ethics 51(2): 167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty W. H., Simms H. P. Jr. (1978) Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4): 451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty W. H., Simms H. P. Jr., (1979) “Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment”. Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3): 331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S. D., Vasquez-Perraga A. Z. (1993) Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Sales Force Supervision. Journal of Marketing Research 30(1): 78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis I. L., Mann L. (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict Choice and Commitment. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones E. E. (1985) Major Developments in Social Psychology During the Past Five Decades. In: Lindzey G., Aronson E. (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology. Random House, New York, pp. 47–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. (1991) Ethical Decision Making By Individuals In Organizations: An Issue Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16(2): 366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones S. K., Hiltebeitel K. M. (1995) Organizational Influence in the Moral Decision Process of Accountants. Journal of Business Ethics 14(6): 417–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1969) Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive Developmental Approach. In: Lechona T., (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior: Theory Research and Social Issues. Hall, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 6–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut G. F., Corriher S. E. (1994) The Relationship of Age, Gender, Experience and Awareness of Written Ethics Policies to Business Decision Making. SAM Advanced Management Journal 59(1): 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Loe T. W., Ferrell L., Mansfield P. (2000) A Review Of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making In Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25(3):158–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K., Butterfield K. D. (1996) The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-Related Behavior in the Workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly 6:461–476

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt R., Van Hise J. (2002) Influences in Ethical Dilemmas of Increasing Intensity. Journal of Business Ethics 40(3): 261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris S. A., Rehbein K. A., Hosseini J. C., Armacost R. L. (1995) A Test of Environmental, Situational, and Personal Influences on the Ethical Intentions of CEO’s. Business and Society 34(2): 119–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson D. M. (2001) Causal Effects of Regulatory, Organizational and Personal Factors on Ethical Sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics 30(2): 123–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. (1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein E. H. (2004) Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheidahl T. K. (1986) Ethical Dilemmas in Managerial Accounting. Management Accounting 64: 34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims R. L., Gegez E. (2004) Attitudes Towards Business Ethics: A Five Nation Comparative Study. Journal of Business Ethics 50(3): 253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J. (1990) Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives. Journal of Macromarketing 10(1): 47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J. (1991) Research Note: Selected Factors Influencing Marketers’ Deontological Norms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19(1): 37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead W. E., Worrell D. L., Stead J. G. (1990) An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 9(3): 233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. (1986) Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11(3): 601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Brown M., Hartman L. P. (2003) A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Executive Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Executive Suite. Human Relations 56(1): 5–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Youngblood S. A. (1990) Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4): 378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell S., Festervand T. (1987) Business Ethics: Conflicts, Practices and Beliefs of Industrial Executives. Journal of Business Ethics 6(2): 111–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver G. R., Trevino L. K., Cochran P. L. (1999) Control Ethics Programs as Control Systems: Influences of Executive Commitment and Environmental Factors. Academy of Management Journal 42(1): 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipple T. W., Swords D. F. (1992) Business Ethics Judgments: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 11(9): 671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Accounting, The Charles F. Dolan School of Business, Fairfield University, 1073 North Benson Road, Fairfield, CT, 06824, United States

    Roselie McDevitt, Catherine Giapponi & Cheryl Tromley

Authors
  1. Roselie McDevitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine Giapponi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheryl Tromley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roselie McDevitt.

Additional information

Roselie McDevitt Sc.D. is Assistant Professor of Accounting at␣the Charles F. Dolan School of Business at Fairfield University in Fairfield, Connecticut. Dr. McDevitt teaches financial and managerial accounting. Her Primary areas of research are accounting education and accounting ethics.

Catherine Giapponi is an Assistant Professor of Management at the Charles F. Dolan School of Business at Fairfield University in Fairfield, Connecticut. Dr. Giapponi teaches courses in management, organizational behavior, and strategy. Her primary areas of research are corporate governance and business ethics.

Cheryl Tromley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Management at␣Fairfield University where she has taught management, organizational behavior, organizational communication, organizational␣culture, organization development, and diversity for 19 years. She has co-authored two editions of the text ``Developing Managerial Skills in Organizational Behavior''␣as well authored or co-authored a significant number of professional articles and presentations related to management and management education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDevitt, R., Giapponi, C. & Tromley, C. A Model of Ethical Decision Making: The Integration of Process and Content. J Bus Ethics 73, 219–229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9202-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9202-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation