Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 68, Issue 2, pp 153–164 | Cite as

Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-making Process in Business Students

  • Barbara A. RitterEmail author


The purpose of this paper is to examine the various guidelines presented in the literature for instituting an ethics curriculum and to empirically study their effectiveness. Three questions are addressed concerning the trainability of ethics material and the proper integration and implementation of an ethics curriculum. An empirical study then tested the effect of ethics training on moral awareness and reasoning. The sample consisted of two business classes, one exposed to additional ethics curriculum (experimental), and one not exposed (control). For the experimental group, ethics exercises and discussion relevant to each topic were completed. Findings suggested gender differences such that, relative to other groups, women in the experimental group showed significantly improved moral awareness and decision-making processes. An explanation of the underlying cognitive processes is presented to explain the gender effect.


business ethics designing business ethics curriculum ethics teaching business ethics teaching undergraduate business students 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This research was funded by the Coastal Carolina University Center for Effective Teaching and Learning Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Grant Program.


  1. Bargh J.A. (1994). The Four Hoursemen of Automaticity: Awareness, Intention, Efficiency, and Control in Social Cognition. In: Wyer J.S., Skrull T.K. (eds) Handbook of Social Cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  2. Beu D.S., Buckley M.R., Harvey M.G. (2003). Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Construct. Business Ethics: A European Review 12(1):88–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callahan D. (1980). Goals in the Effective Teaching of Ethics. In: Callahan D., Bok S. (eds) Ethics in Higher Education. Plenum Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  4. Churchill L.R. (1982). The Teaching of Ethics and Moral Values in Teaching: Some Contemporary Confusions. The Journal of Higher Education 3(3):296–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarkeburn H. (2002). A Test for Ethical Sensitivity in Science. Journal of Moral Education 31(4):439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cragg W. (1997). Teaching Business Ethics: The Role of Ethics in Business and in Business Education. Journal of Business Ethics 16:231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devine P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Felton E.L., Sims R.R. (2005). Teaching Business Ethics: Targeted Outputs. Journal of Business Ethics 60:377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foti R.J., Lord R.G. (1987). Prototypes and Scripts: The Effects of Alternative Methods of Processing Information on Rating Accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39(3):318–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franke G.R., Crown D.F., Spake D.F. (1997). Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Business Practices: A Social Role Theory Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(6):920–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fritzsche, D.J. and H. Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy-An Empirical Investigation’, Academy of Management Journal, 27, 166–175Google Scholar
  12. Galbraith S., Stephenson H.B. (1993). Decision Rules used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgments: Another Look. Journal of Business Ethics 12(3):227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilligan C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Hudson W. (1912). Aim and Content of the First College Course in Ethics. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 9(17):455–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loe T., Weeks W.A. (2000). An Experiment Investigation of Efforts to Improve Sales Students’ Moral Reasoning. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 20(4):243–242Google Scholar
  16. Lowry D. (2003). An Investigation of Student Moral Awareness and Associated Factors in Two Cohorts of an Undergraduate Business Degree in A British University: Implications for Business Ethics Curriculum Design. Journal of Business Ethics 48(1):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mcdonald G.M. (2004). A Case Example: Integrating Ethics into the Academic Business Curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics 54:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Noe R.A. (1999). Employee Training and Development. Mcgraw-Hill, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Oddo A.R. (1997). A Framework for Teaching Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 16:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pettifor J.L., Estay I., Paquet S. (2000). Preferred Strategies for Learning Ethics in the Practice of a Discipline. Canadian Psychology 43(4):260–269Google Scholar
  21. Rest J. (1984). Research on Moral Development: Implications for Training Psychologists. The Counseling Psychologist 12:19–30Google Scholar
  22. Ritter B.A., Lord R.G. (2006). Leadership Transference: The Impact of Previous Leaders on Follower Performance. Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SCGoogle Scholar
  23. Rossouw G.J. (2002). Three Approaches to Teaching Business Ethics. Teaching Business Ethics 6:411–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruegger D., King E.W. (1992). A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 11:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saul G.K. (1981). Business Ethics: Where are We Going? Academy of Management Review 6(2):269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schlaefi A., Rest J.R., Thoma S.J. (1985). Does Moral Education Improve Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies using the Defining Issues Test. Review of Educational Research 55(3):319–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sims R.R. (2002). Business Ethics Teaching for Effective Learning. Teaching Business Ethics 6:393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sims R., Felton E. (2006). Designing and Delivering Business Ethics and Learning. Journal of Business Ethics 63(3):297–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith E.R. (1996). What do connectionism and Social Psychology Offer Each Other?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(5):893–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith P.L., Oakley E.F. (1997). Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management. Journal of Business Ethics 16:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith E.R., Queller S. (2000). Mental representations. In: Tesser A., Schwarz N. (eds) Blackwell Handbook in Social Psychology, Vol 1: Intraindividual Processes. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 111–133Google Scholar
  32. Weber J., Glyptis S.M. (2000). Measuring the Impact of a Business Ethics Course and Community Service Experience on Students’ Values and Opinions. Teaching Business Ethics 4:341–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wittmer D. (1992). Ethical Sensitivity and Managerial Decision-making: An Experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2(4):443–462Google Scholar
  34. Wolfe J., Fritzsche D.J. (1998). Teaching Business Ethics with Management and Marketing Games. Simulation and Gaming 29(1):44–59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ManagementCoastal Carolina UniversityConwayU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations