Skip to main content
Log in

Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While stakeholder theory has traditionally considered organization’s interactions with stakeholders in terms of independent, dyadic relationships, recent scholarship has pointed to the fact that organizations exist within a complex network of intertwining relationships [e.g., Rowley, T. J.: 1997, The Academy of Management Review 22(4), 887–910]. However, further theoretical and empirical development of the interactions between stakeholders has been lacking. In this paper, we develop a framework for understanding and measuring the effects upon the organization of competing, complementary and cooperative stakeholder interactions, which we refer to as stakeholder multiplicity. We draw upon three forms of fit (i.e. fit as matching, fit as moderation, and fit as gestalts; Venkatraman, N.: 1989) to develop a framework for understanding stakeholder multiplicity based upon the direction, strength, and synergies of the interacting claims. Additionally, we draw upon the theory of stakeholder identification and salience of Mitchell et al. (1997), which we argue provides a more relevant and significantly more illustrative explanation of the nature and effects of stakeholder interactions upon the organization than the network approach of Rowley (1997). Furthermore, we ground our framework through reference to three stakeholder groups (i.e. governments, customers, and employees) and the stakeholder issue of concern for the natural environment. We propose a hierarchy of the multiplicity strength of influence of these three stakeholder groups. Potential measurement and implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • B. R. Agle R. K. Mitchell J. A. Sonnenfeld (1999) ArticleTitleWho Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values Academy of Management Journal 42 IssueID5 507–525 Occurrence Handle10.2307/256973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. I. Ansoff (1965) Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion McGraw-Hill New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • H. I. Ansoff (1988) The New Corporate Strategy Wiley New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • S. L. Berman A. C. Wicks S. Kotha T. M. Jones (1999) ArticleTitleDoes Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance Academy of Management Journal 42 IssueID5 488–506 Occurrence Handle10.2307/256972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. R. Carroll M. T. Hannan (1989) ArticleTitleDensity Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Population Administrative Science Quarterly 34 IssueID3 411–430 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2393151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Christmann (2004) ArticleTitleMultinational Companies and the Natural Environment: Determinants of Global Environmental Policy Standardization Academy of Management Journal 47 IssueID5 747–760

    Google Scholar 

  • R. H. Coase (1937) ArticleTitleThe Nature of the Firm Economics   IssueIDNov 386–405

    Google Scholar 

  • T. D’Aunno R. I. Sutton R. H. Price (1991) ArticleTitleIsomorphism and External Support in Conflicting Institutional Environments: A Study of Drug Abuse Treatment Units Academy of Management Journal 34 IssueID3 636–661 Occurrence Handle10.2307/256409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. J. DiMaggio W. W. Powell (1983) ArticleTitleThe Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields American Sociological Review 48 147–160 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2095101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Donaldson L. E. Preston (1995) ArticleTitleThe Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation – Concepts, Evidence, and Implications Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 65–91 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Emerson (1962) ArticleTitle`Power-Dependence Relations' American Sociological Review 27 IssueID1 31–41 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2089716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. C. Ensign (1998) ArticleTitleInterrelationships and Horizontal Strategy to Achieve Synergy and Competitive Advantage in the Diversified Firm Management Decision 36 IssueID10 657–668 Occurrence Handle10.1108/00251749810245318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Evan R. E. Freeman (1983) A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism T. Beauchamp N. Bowie (Eds) Ethical Theory and Business Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 75–93

    Google Scholar 

  • S. T. Fiske S. E. Taylor (1984) Social Cognition Addison-Wesley Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Fleming G. Sewell (2002) ArticleTitle‘Looking for the Good Soldier Švejk: Alternative Modalities of Resistance in the Contemporary Workplace’ Sociology 36 IssueIDNov 857–873

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Pitman Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Frooman (1999) ArticleTitleStakeholder Influence Strategies The Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 191–205 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Harvey A. Schaefer (2001) ArticleTitleManaging Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities Journal of Business Ethics 30 IssueID3 243–260 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006356928957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Henriques P. Sadorsky (1999) ArticleTitleThe Relationship between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance Academy of Management Journal 42 IssueID1 87–99 Occurrence Handle10.2307/256876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Huselid (1995) ArticleTitleThe Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance Academy of Management Journal 38 IssueID3 635–672 Occurrence Handle10.2307/256741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. W. Husted (2000) ArticleTitleA Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance Business and Society 39 IssueID1 24–48

    Google Scholar 

  • M. C. Jensen W. H. Meckling (1976) ArticleTitleTheory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure Journal of Financial Economics 3 IssueID4 305–360 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Jones (1995) ArticleTitleInstrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics The Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID2 404–437 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Knoke (1994) Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making S. Wasserman J. Galaskiewicz (Eds) Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • A. T. Lawrence J. Weber J. E. Post (2005) Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy EditionNumber11 McGraw-Hill Irwin New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Mattingly (2004) ArticleTitleRedefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth, by James Post, Lee Preston, and Sybille Sachs. Review Academy of Management Review 29 IssueID3 520–523 Occurrence Handle10.2307/20159063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Meyer B. Rowan (1977) ArticleTitleInstitutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony American Journal of Sociology 83 IssueID2 340–363 Occurrence Handle10.1086/226550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Mitchell B. R. Agle D. J. Wood (1997) ArticleTitleToward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts Academy of Management Review 22 IssueID4 853–886 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K. and B. R. Agle: 1997, ‘Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Dialogue and Operationalization’, International Association for Business and Society 1997 Proceedings (Destin, FL).

  • Neville, B. A., S. J. Bell and G. Whitwell: 2004, ‘Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Toward an Actionable Tool for the Management of Stakeholders’, The Academy of Management Conference 2004 Best Paper Proceedings (New Orleans).

  • C. Oliver (1991) ArticleTitleStrategic Responses to Institutional Processes The Academy of Management Review 16 IssueID1 145–179 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Pfeffer (1982) Organizations and Organization Theory Pitman Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pfeffer G. R. Salancik (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective Harper & Row New York

    Google Scholar 

  • T. J. Rowley (1997) ArticleTitleMoving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences The Academy of Management Review 22 IssueID4 887–910 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Rowley S. L. Berman (2000) ArticleTitleA Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance Business and Society Review 39 IssueID4 397–418

    Google Scholar 

  • G. T. Savage T. W. Nix C. J. Whitehead J. D. Blair (1991) ArticleTitleStrategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders Academy of Management Executive 5 IssueID2 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • M. C. Suchman (1995) ArticleTitleManaging Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches The Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID3 571–610 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Venkatraman (1989) ArticleTitleThe Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence The Academy of Management Review 14 IssueID3 423–444 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Wasserman J. Galaskiewicz (Eds) (1994) Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Sage Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Weber (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. C. Wicks S. L. Berman T. M. Jones (1999) ArticleTitleThe Structure of Optimal Trust: Moral and Strategic Implications The Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID1 99–116 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. E. Williamson (1975) Markets and Hierarchies Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Wolfe D. S. Putler (2002) ArticleTitleHow Tight are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups? Organization Science 13 IssueID1 64–80 Occurrence Handle10.1287/orsc.13.1.64.544

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin A. Neville.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neville, B.A., Menguc, B. Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders. J Bus Ethics 66, 377–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0015-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0015-4

Keywords

Navigation