Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 285–301 | Cite as

Stakeholder Theory and Managerial Decision-Making: Constraints and Implications of Balancing Stakeholder Interests

  • Scott J. Reynolds
  • Frank C. Schultz
  • David R. Hekman


Stakeholder theory is widely recognized as a management theory, yet very little research has considered its implications for individual managerial decision-making. In the two studies reported here, we used stakeholder theory to examine managerial decisions about balancing stakeholder interests. Results of Study 1 suggest that indivisible resources and unequal levels of stakeholder saliency constrain managers’ efforts to balance stakeholder interests. Resource divisibility also influenced whether managers used a within-decision or an across-decision approach to balance stakeholder interests. In Study 2 we examined instrumental and normative implications of these two approaches. We conclude by considering the contributions of this research.


stakeholder management ethical decision-making balancing stakeholder interests 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackoff, R. L. 1999Ackoff’s Best: His Classic Writings on ManagementWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999‘Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate performance, and CEO Values’Academy of Management Journal42507525Google Scholar
  3. Allison, P. D. 1978‘Measures of Inequality’American Sociological Review43865880Google Scholar
  4. Allison, S. T., McQueen, L. R., Schaerfl, L. M. 1992‘Social Decision-Making Processes and the Equal Partitionment of Shared Resources’Journal of Experimental Social Psychology282342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, J., Frankle, A. 1980‘Voluntary Social Report: An Iso-beta Portfolio Analysis’Accounting Review55468479Google Scholar
  6. Barnard, C. I. 1938Functions of the ExecutiveHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Belkaoui, A. 1976‘The Impact of the Disclosure of the Environmental Effects of Organizational Behavior on the Market’Financial Management52631Google Scholar
  8. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., Jones, T. M. 1999‘Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance’Academy of Management Journal42488506Google Scholar
  9. Boatright, J. R. 1994‘Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder Management Relation: or, what’s so Special about Shareholders?’Business Ethics Quarterly4393407Google Scholar
  10. Bowie, N. E. 1999Business Ethics: A Kantian PerspectiveBlackwellMalden, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowman, E. 1978‘Strategy, Annual Reports, and Alchemy’California Management Review206471Google Scholar
  12. Buckley, W. eds. 1968Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral ScientistAldineChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, A. B. 1989Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder ManagementSouth-WesternCincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavanagh, S. J., Fritzsche, D. J. 1985

    ‘Using Vignettes in Business Ethics Research’

    Preston, L. eds. Research in Corporate Social Performance and PolicyJAI PressGreenwich, CT279293
    Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. 1988Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences2Academic PressNYGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarkson, M. B. E. eds. 1998The Corporation and its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary ReadingsUniversity of Toronto PressToronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  17. Dodd, M. E. 1932‘For whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?’Harvard Law Review4511451163Google Scholar
  18. Donaldson, T., Preston, L. 1995‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’Academy of Management Review206591Google Scholar
  19. Evan, W., Freeman, R. 1993

    ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’

    Beauchamp, T.Bowie, N. eds. Ethical Theory and BusinessPrentice HallEnglewood Cliffs, CA97106
    Google Scholar
  20. Ezzamel, M., Watson, R. 1997

    ‘Wearing Two Hats: The Conflicting Control and Management Roles of Nonexecutive Directors’

    Keasey, K.Thompson, S.Wright, M. eds. Corporate GovernanceOxford University PressOxford5479
    Google Scholar
  21. Frederick, W., Wasieleski, D. 2002‘Evolutionary Social Contracts’Business and Society Review107283308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman, R. E. 1984Strategic Management: A Stakeholder ApproachPitmanBostonGoogle Scholar
  23. Frooman, J. 1999‘Stakeholder Influence Strategies’Academy of Management Review24191205Google Scholar
  24. Garvey, G., Swan, P. 1994‘The Economics of Corporate Governance’Journal of Corporate Finance1139174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodpaster, K. E. 1991‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’Business Ethics Quarterly15373Google Scholar
  26. Hart, O. 1995‘Corporate Governance: Some Theory and Implications’Economic Journal105678689Google Scholar
  27. Hasnas, J. 1998‘The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed’Business Ethics Quarterly81942Google Scholar
  28. Hill, C., Jones, T. 1992‘Stakeholder-Agency Theory’Journal of Management Studies29131154Google Scholar
  29. Hosseini, J., Brenner, S. 1992‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm’Business Ethics Quarterly299121Google Scholar
  30. Jones, T. 1995‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’Academy of Management Review20404437Google Scholar
  31. Jones, T. M., Wicks, A. C. 1999‘Convergent Stakeholder Theory’Academy of Management Review24206221Google Scholar
  32. Katz, D., Kahn, R. L. 1978The Social Psychology of Organizations2WileyNYGoogle Scholar
  33. Kay, J., Silberston, A. 1995‘Corporate Governance’National Institute Economic Review.38497Google Scholar
  34. Kotter, J., Heskett, J. 1992Corporate Culture and PerformanceFree PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Langholtz, H. J., Gettys, C., Foote, B. 1993‘Resource-Allocation Behavior under Certainty, Risk, and Uncertainty’Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes54203224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Langholtz, H. J., Marty, A. T., Ball, C. T., Nolan, E. C. 2003Resource-Allocation BehaviorKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  37. Meznar, M. B., Nigh, D., Kwok, C. C. Y. 1994‘Effect of Announcements of Withdrawal from South Africa on Stockholder Wealth’Academy of Management Journal3716331648Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Wood, D. J. 1997‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’Academy of Management Review22853886Google Scholar
  39. Mussen, P., Eisenberg-Berg, N. 1977Roots of Caring, Sharing, and Helping: The Development of Prosocial Behavior in ChildrenW. H. FreemanSan FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  40. Ogden, S., Watson, R. 1999‘Corporate Performance and Stakeholder Management: Balancing Shareholder and Customer Interests in the U.K. Privatized Water Industry’Academy of Management Journal42526538Google Scholar
  41. Parks, J. M., Boles, T. L., Conlon, D. E., DeSouza, E. 1996‘Distributing Adventitious Outcomes: Social Norms, Egocentric Martyrs, and the Effects on Future Relationships’Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes67181200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Phillips, R. 2003‘Stakeholder Legitimacy’Business Ethics Quarterly132542Google Scholar
  43. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., Sachs, S. 2002‘Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View’California Management Review45628Google Scholar
  44. Preston, L. 1978‘Analyzing Corporate Social Performance: Methods and Results’Journal of Contemporary Business7135150Google Scholar
  45. Senge, P. M. 1990The Fifth DisciplineDouble DayNYGoogle Scholar
  46. Suchman, M. 1995‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’Academy of Management Review20571611Google Scholar
  47. Thomas, K. 1992

    ‘Conflict and Negotiation Processes in Organizations’

    Dunnette, M. D.Hough, L. M. eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology2Consulting Psychologists PressPalo Alto, CA
    Google Scholar
  48. Weber, J. 1992‘Scenarios in Business Ethics Research: Review, Critical Assessment and Recommendations’Journal of Business Ethics11137160Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott J. Reynolds
    • 1
  • Frank C. Schultz
    • 1
  • David R. Hekman
    • 1
  1. 1.Business SchoolUniversity of WashingtonSeattleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations