Skip to main content

From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability

Applying Habermasian Discourse Ethics to Accountability Research

Journal of Business Ethics volume 65, pages 251–267 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Abbreviations

AA 1000:

AccountAbility 1000

GRI:

Global Reporting Initiative

ISEA:

Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability

ISO:

International Organization for Standardization

SEAAR:

Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting

NGO:

Non-Governmental Organization

SA 8000:

Social Accountability 8000

References

  • B. R. Agle R. K. Mitchell J. A. Sonnenfeld (1999) ArticleTitleWho Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values Academy of Management Journal 42 IssueID5 507–525 Occurrence Handle10.2307/256973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Beckett J. Jonker (2002) ArticleTitleAccountAbility 1000: A New Social Standard for Building Sustainability Managerial Auditing Journal 17 IssueID1/2 36–42 Occurrence Handle10.1108/02686900210412225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Belal (2002) ArticleTitleStakeholder Accountability or Stakeholder Management: A Review of UK Firms’ Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting (SEAAR) Practices Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9 IssueID1 8–25 Occurrence Handle10.1002/csr.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. L. Berger T. Luckmann (1967) The Social Construction of Reality – Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge Anchor Books/Doubleday New York

    Google Scholar 

  • K. S. Cameron R. E. Quinn (1988) Organizational Paradox and Transformation K. S. Cameron R. E. Quinn (Eds) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management Ballinger Cambridge 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • M. B. Clarkson (1995) ArticleTitleA Stakeholder Framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 92–117 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Crane S. Livesey (2003) Are you Talking to Me? – Stakeholder Communication and the Risks and Rewards of Dialogue J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted R. S. Suther land (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2 – Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance Greenleaf Sheffield 39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Crane D. Matten (2004) Business Ethics: A European Perspective Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Cummings (2001) ArticleTitleEngaging Stakeholders in Corporate Accountability Programmes: A Cross-Sectoral Analysis of UK and Transnational Experience Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID1 45–52 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Colle ParticleDe C. Gonella (2002) ArticleTitleThe Social and Ethical Alchemy: An Integrative Approach to Social and Ethical Accountability Business Ethics: A European Review 11 IssueID1 86–96 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Donaldson L. E. Preston (1995) ArticleTitleThe Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation – Concepts, Evidence, and Implications Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 65–91 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Dubnick (2003) ArticleTitleAccountability and Ethics: Reconsidering the Relationships International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior 6 IssueID3 405–441

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Dutton R. B. Duncan (1987) ArticleTitleThe Creation of Momentum for Change Through the Process of Strategic Issue Diagnosis Strategic Management Journal 8 IssueID3 279–295

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Elkington (2002) Cannibals with Forks – The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business Capstone Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Foucault (1980) Power/Knowledge – Selected Interviews and Other Writings Harvester Press Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • W. C. Frederick (1986) ArticleTitleToward CSR3: Why Ethical Analysis is Indispensable and Unavoidable in Corporate Affairs California Management Review 28 IssueID2 126–141

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman (1999) ArticleTitleDivergent Stakeholder Theory Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 233–236 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Pitman Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman D. R. Gilbert (1988) Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics Prentice-Hall Englewood-Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman D. L. Reed (1983) ArticleTitleStockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance California Management Review 25 IssueID3 88–106

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman D. R. Gilbert E. Hartman (1988) ArticleTitleValues and the Foundations of Strategic Management Journal of Business Ethics 7 IssueID11 821–834 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00383045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. F. Gago M. N. Antolin (2004) ArticleTitleStakeholder Salience in Corporate Environmental Strategy Corporate Governance 4 IssueID3 65–76 Occurrence Handle10.1108/14720700410547512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Gioia (1999) ArticleTitlePracticability, Paradigms, and Problems in Stakeholder Theorizing Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 228–232 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Göbbels J. Jonker (2003) ArticleTitleAA1000 and SA 8000 Compared: A Systematic Comparison of Contemporary Accountability Standards Managerial Accounting Journal 18 IssueID1 54–58 Occurrence Handle10.1108/02686900310454246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Goodell (1999) Standards of Corporate Social Responsibility Social Venture Network San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gray (2002) ArticleTitleThe Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organizations and Society – Privileging Engagement, Imaginings, new Accountings and Pragmatism over Critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 IssueID7 687–708 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00003-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gray (2001) ArticleTitleThirty Years of Social Accounting, Reporting, and Auditing: What (if Anything) Have we Learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID1 9–15 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gray D. L Owen K. Maunders (1988) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Reporting: Emerging Trends in Accountability and the Social Contract Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 1 IssueID1 6–20 Occurrence Handle10.1108/EUM0000000004617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameGlobal Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2000) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental and Social Performance Global Reporting Initiative Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Habermas (2001) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Habermas (1999) The Inclusion of the Other Studies in Political Theory Blackwell Publishing Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Habermas (1996a) Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Habermas (1996b) Between Facts and Norms Blackwell Publishing Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Habermas (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action (1) – Communication and Evolution of Society Beacon Press Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Habermas N. Luhmann (1971) Gesellschaftstheorie oder Sozialtechnologie? Suhrkamp Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • C. W. L. Hill T. M. Jones (1992) ArticleTitleStakeholder-agency Theory Journal of Management Studies 29 IssueID2 131–154

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameInstitute of Social and EthicalAccountability (ISEA) (2002) AA 1000 Assurance Standard ISEA London

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameInstitute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA) (1999) AccountAbility 1000: A Foundation Standard in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting ISEA London

    Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Johnson-Cramer S. L. Berman J. E. Post (2003) Re-examining the Concept of Stakeholder Management J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted R. S. Sutherland (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2 – Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance Greenleaf Sheffield 145–161

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Jonker D. Foster (2002) ArticleTitleStakeholder Excellence? Framing the Evolution and Complexity of a Stakeholder Perspective of the Firm Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9 IssueID4 187–195 Occurrence Handle10.1002/csr.23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Kant (1997) Critique of Practical Reason Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Kant (1995) Prolegomena Zu Einer Jeden Künftigen Metaphysik, Die Als Wissenschaft Wird Auftreten Können Philipp Reclam Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Leipziger (2003) The Corporate Responsibility Code Book Greenleaf Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Leipziger (2001) SA 8000 – The Definite Guide to the New Social Standard FT Prentice Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Logsdon P. G. Lewellyn (2000) ArticleTitleExpanding Accountability to Stakeholders: Trends and Predictions Business Society Review 105 IssueID4 419–435 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0045-3609.00091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Lozano (2001) ArticleTitleProposal for a Model for the Elaboration of Ethical Codes Based on Discourse Ethics Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID2 157–162 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Lyotard (1985) The Postmodern Condition – A Report on Knowledge University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Martin (2002) ArticleTitleThe Virtue Matrix: Calculating the Return on Corporate Responsibility Harvard Business Review 80 IssueID3 69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • M. R. Mathews (1997) ArticleTitleTwenty-five Years of Social and Environmental Accounting Research – is There a Silver Jubilee to Celebrate? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10 IssueID4 481–531 Occurrence Handle10.1108/EUM0000000004417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. McIntosh R. Thomas D. Leipziger G. Coleman (2003) Living Corporate Citizenship – Strategic Routes to Socially Responsible Business FT Prentice Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Mitchell B. R. Agle D. J. Wood (1997) ArticleTitleToward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principles of Who and What Really Counts Academy of Management Review 22 IssueID4 853–886 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadvi, K. F. Wältring 2001 Making Sense of Global Standards Joint Discussion Paper of the Institute for Development Studies at the University of Sussex and the Institute for Development and Peace at the University of Duisburg, Duisburg

  • Neville, B.A., S.J. Bell and G. Whitwell: 2004, Stakeholder Salience Revisited – Toward an Actionable Tools For the Management of Stakeholders, Academy of Management Best Conference Paper Proceedings, pp. D1–D6.

  • B. O’Dwyer (2005) ArticleTitleThe Construction of a Social Account: A Case Study in an Overseas Aid Agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 IssueID3 279–296 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.aos.2004.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. O’Dwyer (2001) ArticleTitleThe Legitimacy of Accountants’ Participation in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID1 27–39 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Owen T. A. Swift (2001) ArticleTitleSocial Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: Beyond the Rhetoric? Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID1 4–8 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Owen T. A. Swift K. Hunt (2001) ArticleTitleQuestioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting Accounting Forum 25 IssueID3 264–282 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-6303.00066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Owen T. A. Swift C. Humphrey M. Bowerman (2000) ArticleTitleThe new Social Audits: Accountability, Managerial Capture or the Agenda of Social Champions European Accounting Review 9 IssueID1 81–99 Occurrence Handle10.1080/096381800407950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. J. Pavlock F. S. Sato J. A. Yardley (1990) ArticleTitleAccountability Standards for Corporate Reporting Business Credit 92 IssueID6 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Power R. Laughlin (1996) ArticleTitleHabermas, Law and Accounting Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 IssueID5 441–465 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0361-3682(95)00036-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. V. Ramanathan (1976) ArticleTitleToward a Theory of Corporate Social Accounting The Accounting Review 51 IssueID3 516–528

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Reed (1999) ArticleTitleStakeholder Management Theory: A Critical Theory Perspective Business Ethics Quarterly 9 IssueID3 453–483

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameSocial Accountability International (SAI) (2001) SA 8000 Guidance Document SAI New York

    Google Scholar 

  • G. T. Savage T. W. Nix C. J. Whitehead J. D. Blair (1991) ArticleTitleStrategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholder Academy of Management Executive 5 IssueID2 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Suchman (1995) ArticleTitleManaging Legitimacy – Strategic and Institutional Approaches Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID3 571–610 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, T. A., and R. D. Pritchard: 1999, Turning a Deaf Ear to Stakeholder Voices? A Critique of Contemporary Methods of Social Accounting. Paper Presented at the 1999 British Academy of Management Conference: Manchester, UK

  • R. Thaler-Carter (1999) ArticleTitleSocial Accountability 8000 Human Resource Magazine 44 IssueID6 106–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P.: 1998a, Integrative Economic Ethics: Towards a Conception of Socio-Economic Rationalit, Working Paper No. 82 of the Institute for Business Ethics: University of St. Gallen

  • Ulrich, P.: 1998b, Towards an Ethically-Based Conception of Socio-Economic Rationality: From the Social Contract Theory to Discourse Ethics as the Normative Foundation of Political Economy, Working Paper No. 29 of the Institute for Business Ethics: University of St. Gallen

  • J. Unerman M. Bennett (2004) ArticleTitleIncreased Stakeholder Dialogue and the Internet: Towards Greater Corporate Social Accountability or Reinforcing Capitalist Hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 IssueID7 685–708 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Zadek (1999) ArticleTitleLooking Back from 2050 Business Ethics: A European Review 8 IssueID3 186–189 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Logistics and Organization, University of the Armed Forces Hamburg, Helmut-Schmidt University, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043, Hamburg, Germany

    Andreas Rasche

  2. London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK

    Daniel E. Esser

Authors
  1. Andreas Rasche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel E. Esser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Rasche.

Additional information

Andreas Rasche is currently working at the chair for Business Administration at the Helmut-Schmidt-University, Hamburg, Germany and is finishing his PhD in strategic management at EUROPEAN BUSINESS SCHOOL, Germany where he is also teaching business ethics. His research interests include the institutionalization of ethics initiatives in multinational corporations (see also www.ethics-in-pratice.org) and reflections about the theory of strategic management. Daniel Esser until recently was a Tutorial Fellow in Development Management at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He is now working for the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific where he is involved in the design and management of urban governance programmes and service schemes supporting the poverty reduction agenda for the region.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasche, A., Esser, D.E. From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability. J Bus Ethics 65, 251–267 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y

Keywords

  • accountability standards
  • discourse ethics
  • Habermas
  • organizational accountability
  • stakeholder management
  • stakeholder dialogue