Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability

Applying Habermasian Discourse Ethics to Accountability Research

  • 1907 Accesses

  • 135 Citations

Abstract

Confronted with mounting pressure to ensure accountability vis-à-vis customers, citizens and beneficiaries, organizational leaders need to decide how to choose and implement so-called accountability standards. Yet while looking for an appropriate standard, they often base their decisions on cost-benefit calculations, thus neglecting other important spheres of influence pertaining to more broadly defined stakeholder interests. We argue in this paper that, as a part of the strategic decision for a certain standard, management needs to identify and act according to the needs of all stakeholders. We contend that the creation of a dialogical understanding among affected stakeholders cannot be a mere outcome of applying certain accountability standards, but rather must be a necessary precondition for their use. This requires a stakeholder dialogue prior to making a choice. We outline such a discursive decision framework for accountability standards based on the Habermasian concept of communicative action and, in the final section, apply our conceptual framework to one of the most prominent accountability tools (AA 1000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Abbreviations

AA 1000:

AccountAbility 1000

GRI:

Global Reporting Initiative

ISEA:

Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability

ISO:

International Organization for Standardization

SEAAR:

Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting

NGO:

Non-Governmental Organization

SA 8000:

Social Accountability 8000

References

  1. B. R. Agle R. K. Mitchell J. A. Sonnenfeld (1999) ArticleTitleWho Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values Academy of Management Journal 42 IssueID5 507–525 Occurrence Handle10.2307/256973

  2. R. Beckett J. Jonker (2002) ArticleTitleAccountAbility 1000: A New Social Standard for Building Sustainability Managerial Auditing Journal 17 IssueID1/2 36–42 Occurrence Handle10.1108/02686900210412225

  3. A. R. Belal (2002) ArticleTitleStakeholder Accountability or Stakeholder Management: A Review of UK Firms’ Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting (SEAAR) Practices Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9 IssueID1 8–25 Occurrence Handle10.1002/csr.5

  4. P. L. Berger T. Luckmann (1967) The Social Construction of Reality – Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge Anchor Books/Doubleday New York

  5. K. S. Cameron R. E. Quinn (1988) Organizational Paradox and Transformation K. S. Cameron R. E. Quinn (Eds) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management Ballinger Cambridge 1–19

  6. M. B. Clarkson (1995) ArticleTitleA Stakeholder Framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 92–117 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258888

  7. A. Crane S. Livesey (2003) Are you Talking to Me? – Stakeholder Communication and the Risks and Rewards of Dialogue J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted R. S. Suther land (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2 – Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance Greenleaf Sheffield 39–52

  8. A. Crane D. Matten (2004) Business Ethics: A European Perspective Oxford University Press Oxford

  9. J. F. Cummings (2001) ArticleTitleEngaging Stakeholders in Corporate Accountability Programmes: A Cross-Sectoral Analysis of UK and Transnational Experience Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID1 45–52 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00211

  10. S. Colle ParticleDe C. Gonella (2002) ArticleTitleThe Social and Ethical Alchemy: An Integrative Approach to Social and Ethical Accountability Business Ethics: A European Review 11 IssueID1 86–96 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00261

  11. T. Donaldson L. E. Preston (1995) ArticleTitleThe Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation – Concepts, Evidence, and Implications Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 65–91 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258887

  12. M. J. Dubnick (2003) ArticleTitleAccountability and Ethics: Reconsidering the Relationships International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior 6 IssueID3 405–441

  13. J. E. Dutton R. B. Duncan (1987) ArticleTitleThe Creation of Momentum for Change Through the Process of Strategic Issue Diagnosis Strategic Management Journal 8 IssueID3 279–295

  14. J. Elkington (2002) Cannibals with Forks – The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business Capstone Oxford

  15. M. Foucault (1980) Power/Knowledge – Selected Interviews and Other Writings Harvester Press Brighton

  16. W. C. Frederick (1986) ArticleTitleToward CSR3: Why Ethical Analysis is Indispensable and Unavoidable in Corporate Affairs California Management Review 28 IssueID2 126–141

  17. R. E. Freeman (1999) ArticleTitleDivergent Stakeholder Theory Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 233–236 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259078

  18. R. E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Pitman Boston

  19. R. E. Freeman D. R. Gilbert (1988) Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics Prentice-Hall Englewood-Cliffs, NJ

  20. R. E. Freeman D. L. Reed (1983) ArticleTitleStockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance California Management Review 25 IssueID3 88–106

  21. R. E. Freeman D. R. Gilbert E. Hartman (1988) ArticleTitleValues and the Foundations of Strategic Management Journal of Business Ethics 7 IssueID11 821–834 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00383045

  22. R. F. Gago M. N. Antolin (2004) ArticleTitleStakeholder Salience in Corporate Environmental Strategy Corporate Governance 4 IssueID3 65–76 Occurrence Handle10.1108/14720700410547512

  23. D. A. Gioia (1999) ArticleTitlePracticability, Paradigms, and Problems in Stakeholder Theorizing Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 228–232 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259077

  24. M. Göbbels J. Jonker (2003) ArticleTitleAA1000 and SA 8000 Compared: A Systematic Comparison of Contemporary Accountability Standards Managerial Accounting Journal 18 IssueID1 54–58 Occurrence Handle10.1108/02686900310454246

  25. E. Goodell (1999) Standards of Corporate Social Responsibility Social Venture Network San Francisco, CA

  26. R. Gray (2002) ArticleTitleThe Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organizations and Society – Privileging Engagement, Imaginings, new Accountings and Pragmatism over Critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 IssueID7 687–708 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00003-9

  27. R. Gray (2001) ArticleTitleThirty Years of Social Accounting, Reporting, and Auditing: What (if Anything) Have we Learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID1 9–15 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00207

  28. R. Gray D. L Owen K. Maunders (1988) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Reporting: Emerging Trends in Accountability and the Social Contract Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 1 IssueID1 6–20 Occurrence Handle10.1108/EUM0000000004617

  29. InstitutionalAuthorNameGlobal Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2000) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental and Social Performance Global Reporting Initiative Boston

  30. J. Habermas (2001) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action MIT Press Cambridge, MA

  31. J. Habermas (1999) The Inclusion of the Other Studies in Political Theory Blackwell Publishing Cambridge, MA

  32. J. Habermas (1996a) Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays MIT Press Cambridge, MA

  33. J. Habermas (1996b) Between Facts and Norms Blackwell Publishing Cambridge, MA

  34. J. Habermas (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action (1) – Communication and Evolution of Society Beacon Press Boston

  35. J. Habermas N. Luhmann (1971) Gesellschaftstheorie oder Sozialtechnologie? Suhrkamp Frankfurt am Main

  36. C. W. L. Hill T. M. Jones (1992) ArticleTitleStakeholder-agency Theory Journal of Management Studies 29 IssueID2 131–154

  37. InstitutionalAuthorNameInstitute of Social and EthicalAccountability (ISEA) (2002) AA 1000 Assurance Standard ISEA London

  38. InstitutionalAuthorNameInstitute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA) (1999) AccountAbility 1000: A Foundation Standard in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting ISEA London

  39. M. E. Johnson-Cramer S. L. Berman J. E. Post (2003) Re-examining the Concept of Stakeholder Management J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted R. S. Sutherland (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2 – Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance Greenleaf Sheffield 145–161

  40. J. Jonker D. Foster (2002) ArticleTitleStakeholder Excellence? Framing the Evolution and Complexity of a Stakeholder Perspective of the Firm Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9 IssueID4 187–195 Occurrence Handle10.1002/csr.23

  41. I. Kant (1997) Critique of Practical Reason Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK

  42. I. Kant (1995) Prolegomena Zu Einer Jeden Künftigen Metaphysik, Die Als Wissenschaft Wird Auftreten Können Philipp Reclam Stuttgart

  43. D. Leipziger (2003) The Corporate Responsibility Code Book Greenleaf Sheffield

  44. D. Leipziger (2001) SA 8000 – The Definite Guide to the New Social Standard FT Prentice Hall London

  45. J. M. Logsdon P. G. Lewellyn (2000) ArticleTitleExpanding Accountability to Stakeholders: Trends and Predictions Business Society Review 105 IssueID4 419–435 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0045-3609.00091

  46. J. F. Lozano (2001) ArticleTitleProposal for a Model for the Elaboration of Ethical Codes Based on Discourse Ethics Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID2 157–162 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00226

  47. J. F. Lyotard (1985) The Postmodern Condition – A Report on Knowledge University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis

  48. R. L. Martin (2002) ArticleTitleThe Virtue Matrix: Calculating the Return on Corporate Responsibility Harvard Business Review 80 IssueID3 69–75

  49. M. R. Mathews (1997) ArticleTitleTwenty-five Years of Social and Environmental Accounting Research – is There a Silver Jubilee to Celebrate? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10 IssueID4 481–531 Occurrence Handle10.1108/EUM0000000004417

  50. M. McIntosh R. Thomas D. Leipziger G. Coleman (2003) Living Corporate Citizenship – Strategic Routes to Socially Responsible Business FT Prentice Hall London

  51. R. K. Mitchell B. R. Agle D. J. Wood (1997) ArticleTitleToward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principles of Who and What Really Counts Academy of Management Review 22 IssueID4 853–886 Occurrence Handle10.2307/259247

  52. Nadvi, K. F. Wältring 2001 Making Sense of Global Standards Joint Discussion Paper of the Institute for Development Studies at the University of Sussex and the Institute for Development and Peace at the University of Duisburg, Duisburg

  53. Neville, B.A., S.J. Bell and G. Whitwell: 2004, Stakeholder Salience Revisited – Toward an Actionable Tools For the Management of Stakeholders, Academy of Management Best Conference Paper Proceedings, pp. D1–D6.

  54. B. O’Dwyer (2005) ArticleTitleThe Construction of a Social Account: A Case Study in an Overseas Aid Agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 IssueID3 279–296 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.aos.2004.01.001

  55. B. O’Dwyer (2001) ArticleTitleThe Legitimacy of Accountants’ Participation in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID1 27–39 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00209

  56. D. L. Owen T. A. Swift (2001) ArticleTitleSocial Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: Beyond the Rhetoric? Business Ethics: A European Review 10 IssueID1 4–8 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00206

  57. D. L. Owen T. A. Swift K. Hunt (2001) ArticleTitleQuestioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting Accounting Forum 25 IssueID3 264–282 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-6303.00066

  58. D. L. Owen T. A. Swift C. Humphrey M. Bowerman (2000) ArticleTitleThe new Social Audits: Accountability, Managerial Capture or the Agenda of Social Champions European Accounting Review 9 IssueID1 81–99 Occurrence Handle10.1080/096381800407950

  59. E. J. Pavlock F. S. Sato J. A. Yardley (1990) ArticleTitleAccountability Standards for Corporate Reporting Business Credit 92 IssueID6 8–11

  60. M. Power R. Laughlin (1996) ArticleTitleHabermas, Law and Accounting Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 IssueID5 441–465 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0361-3682(95)00036-4

  61. K. V. Ramanathan (1976) ArticleTitleToward a Theory of Corporate Social Accounting The Accounting Review 51 IssueID3 516–528

  62. D. Reed (1999) ArticleTitleStakeholder Management Theory: A Critical Theory Perspective Business Ethics Quarterly 9 IssueID3 453–483

  63. InstitutionalAuthorNameSocial Accountability International (SAI) (2001) SA 8000 Guidance Document SAI New York

  64. G. T. Savage T. W. Nix C. J. Whitehead J. D. Blair (1991) ArticleTitleStrategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholder Academy of Management Executive 5 IssueID2 61–75

  65. M. E. Suchman (1995) ArticleTitleManaging Legitimacy – Strategic and Institutional Approaches Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID3 571–610 Occurrence Handle10.2307/258788

  66. Swift, T. A., and R. D. Pritchard: 1999, Turning a Deaf Ear to Stakeholder Voices? A Critique of Contemporary Methods of Social Accounting. Paper Presented at the 1999 British Academy of Management Conference: Manchester, UK

  67. R. Thaler-Carter (1999) ArticleTitleSocial Accountability 8000 Human Resource Magazine 44 IssueID6 106–111

  68. Ulrich, P.: 1998a, Integrative Economic Ethics: Towards a Conception of Socio-Economic Rationalit, Working Paper No. 82 of the Institute for Business Ethics: University of St. Gallen

  69. Ulrich, P.: 1998b, Towards an Ethically-Based Conception of Socio-Economic Rationality: From the Social Contract Theory to Discourse Ethics as the Normative Foundation of Political Economy, Working Paper No. 29 of the Institute for Business Ethics: University of St. Gallen

  70. J. Unerman M. Bennett (2004) ArticleTitleIncreased Stakeholder Dialogue and the Internet: Towards Greater Corporate Social Accountability or Reinforcing Capitalist Hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 IssueID7 685–708 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.009

  71. S. Zadek (1999) ArticleTitleLooking Back from 2050 Business Ethics: A European Review 8 IssueID3 186–189 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8608.00147

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Andreas Rasche.

Additional information

Andreas Rasche is currently working at the chair for Business Administration at the Helmut-Schmidt-University, Hamburg, Germany and is finishing his PhD in strategic management at EUROPEAN BUSINESS SCHOOL, Germany where he is also teaching business ethics. His research interests include the institutionalization of ethics initiatives in multinational corporations (see also www.ethics-in-pratice.org) and reflections about the theory of strategic management. Daniel Esser until recently was a Tutorial Fellow in Development Management at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He is now working for the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific where he is involved in the design and management of urban governance programmes and service schemes supporting the poverty reduction agenda for the region.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasche, A., Esser, D.E. From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability. J Bus Ethics 65, 251–267 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • accountability standards
  • discourse ethics
  • Habermas
  • organizational accountability
  • stakeholder management
  • stakeholder dialogue