Skip to main content
Log in

Illusions of Corporate Power:Revisiting the Relative Powers of Corporations and Governments

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common opinion is that power has shifted from states to companies. This article discusses quantitative and qualitative aspects of power possessed by companies and by states. A more adequate comparison than that between company sales and gross national product is the one between company value added and GNP. Also more adequate is the comparison between the public sector and company net profit. These rival measures take down company power to about a tenth of the sales measure. Also in qualitative terms the "exit power" of the company gives a low impact compared to governmental action and the article concludes that company power by common measures is overestimated. However, the aggregated long-term effect of the market economy on the development of society is most significant. But it is a mistake to use that judgment as an argument for the opinion that business executives are the major power holders in modern societies. Perceptions of power also have an impact on which expectations and commitments that can be judged as realistic and therefore the issue of power is central for the normative discussion about corporate social responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boda, Z.: 2002, ‘International Ethics and Globalization’, in L. Zsolnai (ed.) Ethics in the Economy Handbook of Business Ethics (Peter Lang AG-European Academic Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J.: 1999, Speech at Hay-on-Wye.

  • Carroll, A. and A. Buchholtz: 2003, Business and Society - Ethics and Shareholder Management (South-Western Thomson, Mason, Ohio).

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T.: 1999, Business Ethics The Fifth Edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F.: 1992, The End of History and the Last Man (Hamish Hamilton, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giscard d'Estaing, O.: 2002, ‘Discussion’, in Zsolnai and Gasparski (eds.), Ethics and the Future of Capitalism (Transaction Publishers, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D.: 2001, Misguided Virtue (The Institute of International Affairs, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.: 1970, Exit Voice and Loyalty Responses to Decline in Firms Organizations and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S.: 1993, The Anatomy of Antiliberalism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S.: 2002, The Clash of Civilizations - and the Remaking of World Order. (Simon and Schuster, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1797/1983, Ethical Philosophy (Hackett, Indianapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M.: 1995, World Class: Thriving Locally in the Global Economy (Simon & Schuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N.: 2000, No Logo (Flamingo, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D.: 1996, When Corporations Rule the World (McGraw-Hill, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, C.: 1748/1989, The Spirit of the Laws (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.: 2003, ‘Hives and horseshoes, Mintzberg or MacIntyre: What future for corporate social responsi-bility?’, Business Ethics A European Review 12(1), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, J.: 2001, In Defence of Global Capitalism (Tim-bro, Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T.: 1776/1991, Rights of Man (Carol Publishing Group, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R.: 1998, Statistics on Democide - genocide and mass murder since 1900. (Lit, Münster).

  • Saul, J. R.: 1998, The Unconscious Civilization (Penguin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell Annual Report 2002. Available on www.shell.com.

  • Skandia Annual Report 2001, p. 48.

  • Soros, G.: 1998, The Crises of Global Capitalism (Little, Brown and Co, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden. The GNP number according to official statistics are converted from SEK to USD by the average exchange rate during 2002 according to www.Riksbank.se.

  • The Economist 1995, October 7. ‘The myth of the powerless state’. p. 13.

  • The Economist 1997, September 20. ‘The Future of the State’, p. 11 (alluding to the page of this special survey within the journal).

  • de Tocqueville, A.: 1840/1969, Democracy in America (Garden City, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugarteche, O.: 2000, The False Dilemma. Globalization: Opportunity or Threat (Zed Books Ltd, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.: 2002, Leading Corporate Citizens: Vision Values Value added. (McGraw-Hill, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q.: 1995, ‘Capitalism and morality’. The Public Interest #21 (Fall 1995), pp. 52–71.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tullberg, J. Illusions of Corporate Power:Revisiting the Relative Powers of Corporations and Governments. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 325–333 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1530-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1530-9

Navigation