Guaranteed QoS synthesis — an example of a scalable core IP quality of service solution

Abstract

With the transition of services like telephony to be carried over IP networks there is the potential for catastrophic numbers of calls to fail whenever sufficient demand is focused on unpredictable points in the core IP network. This is well known; service differentiation helps but does not alleviate the problem — call admission control is required but seems expensive for the few occasions it is needed. This paper describes a BT-developed experimental mechanism (based on work done by TU-Darmstadt within the Market Managed Multiservice Internet collaborative project — http://www.m3i.org/) called guaranteed QoS synthesis (GQS) that performs call admission for core IP networks for constant bit rate streams (voice and video). The mechanism is primarily aimed at Internet services but it may be possible to extend it for VPN applications. The GQS mechanism is economic to deploy and operate, and scales without any increase in complexity. It achieves these properties by keeping no flow state in the network and basing call admission decisions on the measured congestion across the network. The paper describes the high-level GQS architecture as well as some of the deployment issues and potential savings in the operational support area. How GQS enables the separation of the interconnect QoS and retail business models is also explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1

    Market Managed Multiservice Internet — http://www.m3i.org/

  2. 2

    Braden R, Clark D and Shenker S: ‘Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview’, IETF RFC1633 (June 1994) — http://www.ietf.org/rfc/

  3. 3

    Braden R, Zhang L, Berson S, Herzog S and Jamin S (Eds): ‘Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) — Version 1 Functional Specification’, IETF RFC2205 (September 1997) — http://www.ietf.org/rfc/

  4. 4

    Nichols K, Blake S, Baker F and Black D: ‘Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers’, IETF RFC2474 (December 1998) — http://www.ietf.org/rfc/

  5. 5

    Blake S, Black D, Carlson M, Davies E, Wang Z and Weiss W: ‘An Architecture for Differentiated Services’, IETF RFC2475 (December 1998) — http://www.ietf.org/rfc/

  6. 6

    Ramakrishnan K K, Floyd S and Black D: ‘The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP’, IETF RFC3168 (September 2001) — http://www.ietf.org/rfc/

  7. 7

    Yavatkar R, Pendarakis D and Guerin R: ‘A Framework for Policy-based Admission Control’, IETF RFC2753 (January 2000) — http://www.ietf.org/rfc/

  8. 8

    Kelly F, Manlloo A and Tan D: ‘Rate control in communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability’, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, No3, pp 237–252 (March 1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Hovell, P., Briscoe, R. & Corliano, G. Guaranteed QoS synthesis — an example of a scalable core IP quality of service solution. BT Technol J 23, 160–170 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10550-005-0014-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Admission Control
  • Internet Service
  • Experimental Mechanism
  • Collaborative Project
  • Call Admission Control