Delivering QoS in the next generation network — a standards perspective

Abstract

The next generation network (NGN) is envisaged as being an IP-based network which supports a wide variety of applications in an increasingly converged fixed-mobile environment. This paper looks at the key standards which are available as enablers to the building and operating of an NGN that delivers appropriate levels of quality of service for end-user applications.

The paper starts by looking at a general framework for quality of service (QoS) standards, including the necessary terminology to distinguish between the performance of the network and the requirements of applications. It goes on to look at the key standards that address the application requirements, the performance of the IP layer and the behaviour of its bearer. In addition the paper discusses several concepts designed to allow the control of QoS levels in IP-based networks. Although it also discusses published standards, there is much ongoing standardisation activity in the technical areas of QoS and network performance that is outside the scope of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1

    ITU-T: ‘Recommendation E.800: Terms and Definitions Related to Quality of Service and Network Performance Including Dependability’, (1994).

  2. 2

    ITU-T: ‘Recommendation G.1000: Communications Quality of Service: A Framework and Definitions’, (2001).

  3. 3

    ISO 8402: ‘Quality Management and Quality Assurance — Vocabulary’, (1994).

  4. 4

    Blake S et al: ‘An Architecture for Differentiated Services’, IETF RFC2475 (1998).

  5. 5

    Braden R et al: ‘Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) — Version 1 Functional Specification’, IETF RFC2205 (1997).

  6. 6

    Braden R et al: ‘Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An Overview’, IETF RFC1633 (1994).

  7. 7

    Rosen E et al: ‘Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture’, IETF RFC3031 (2001).

  8. 8

    ITU-T: ‘Recommendation Y.1541: Network Performance Objectives for IP-based services’, (2002).

  9. 9

    Clark D, Shenker S and L Zhang: ‘Supporting Real-Time Applications in an Integrated Services Packet Network: Architecture and Mechanisms’, Proc SIGCOMM ‘92, Baltimore, MD (August 1992).

  10. 10

    Mankin A et al: ‘Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Version 1 Applicability Statement Some Guidelines on Deployment’, IETF RFC2208 (1997).

  11. 11

    Mannie E: ‘Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture’, IETF RFC3945 (2004).

  12. 12

    Awduche D et al: ‘RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels’, IETF RFC3209 (2001).

  13. 13

    Berger L: ‘Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signalling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions’, IETF RFC3473 (2003).

  14. 14

    Berger L et al: ‘RSVP Refresh Overhead Reduction Extensions’, IETF RFC2961 (2001).

  15. 15

    Blake S: ‘Some Issues and Applications of Packet Marking for Differentiated Services’, IETF Internet-Draft, draft-blake-diffserv-marking-00.txt (December 1997).

  16. 16

    Bohn R, Braun H, Claffy K and Wolff S: ‘Mitigating the coming Internet crunch: multiple service levels via Precedence’, UCSD/NSF Technical Report (November 1993).

  17. 17

    Willis P J: ‘Introduction to quality of service, BT Technol J, 23, No2, pp 13–27 (April 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Heinanen J et al: ‘Assured Forwarding PHB Group’, IETF RFC2597 (1999).

  19. 19

    Davie B et al: ‘An Expedited Forwarding PHB’, IETF RFC3246 (2002).

  20. 20

    Rosen E and Rekhter Y: ‘BGP/MPLS VPNs’, IETF RFC2547 (1999).

  21. 21

    ITU-T: ‘Recommendation G.1010: End-user Multimedia QoS Categories’, (2001).

  22. 22

    ITU-T: ‘Recommendation Y.1540: Internet Protocol Data Communication Service — IP Packet Transfer and Availability Performance Parameters’, (2002).

  23. 23

    Paxson V et al: ‘Framework for IP Performance Metrics’, IETF RFC2330 (1998).

  24. 24

    ITU-T: ‘Recommendation M.2301: Performance Objectives and Procedures for Provisioning and Maintenance of IP-based Networks’, (2002).

  25. 25

    ITU-T: ‘Recommendation I.356: B-ISDN ATM Layer Cell Transfer Performance’, (2000).

  26. 26

    3GPP: ‘TS 23-107 Quality of Service (QoS) Concept and Architecture V5.10.0’, (September 2003).

  27. 27

    3GPP: ‘TS 29-207 Policy Control Over the Go Interface V.5.5.1’, (October 2003).

  28. 28

    ITU-T: ‘Recommendation Y.1221: Traffic Control and Congestion Control in IP Based Networks’, (2002).

  29. 29

    Cuevas M: ‘Admission control and resource reservation for session-based applications in next generation networks’, BT Technol J, 23, No2, pp 130–145 (April 2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Mustill, D., Willis, P.J. Delivering QoS in the next generation network — a standards perspective. BT Technol J 23, 48–60 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10550-005-0006-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • User Interface
  • General Framework
  • Generation Network
  • Network Performance
  • Multimedia Information