QoS requirements for a voice-over-IP PSTN

Abstract

Voice over IP is already widespread in enterprise private networks and is growing in public switched voice networks as manufacturers withdraw support for earlier technologies. Packet transmission of voice can introduce new impairments, including packet loss, extra sources of delay, and the use of compressed speech coding, all of which may affect voice quality delivered to the user. Factors affecting the quality of a voice telephony connection are described, concentrating on those which are changed by the move to packet transmission, including the complex area of delay. We outline subjective testing based on users’ opinions of fragments of recorded audio material or of connections realised in a laboratory, and describe the abstraction of these results into transmission planning models to assist with design of networks and their QoS mechanisms. QoS requirements are stated for a packet technology to support a PSTN and ISDN service in the UK telecommunications environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1

    ITU-T Recommendation G.702: ‘Digital hierarchy bit rates’, (1988).

  2. 2

    ITU-T Recommendation G.707: ‘Network node interface for the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)’, (2004).

  3. 3

    ITU-T Recommendation G.711: ‘Pulse code modulation (PCM) of voice frequencies’, (1988).

  4. 4

    ITU-T Recommendation Q.700: ‘Introduction to CCITT Signalling System No 7’, (1993).

  5. 5

    ITU-T Recommendation X.200: ‘Information technology — open systems interconnection — basic reference model: The basic model’, (1994).

  6. 6

    IETF RFC0791: ‘Internet Protocol’, (1981).

  7. 7

    IETF RFC0793: ‘Transmission Control Protocol’, (1981).

  8. 8

    ITU-T Recommendation G.723.1: ‘Dual rate speech coder for multimedia communications transmitting at 5.3 and 6.3 kbit/s’, (1996).

  9. 9

    ITU-T Recommendation G.729: ‘Coding of speech at 8 kbit/s using conjugate-structure algebraic-code-excited linear-prediction (CS-ACELP)’, (1996).

  10. 10

    ITU-T Recommendation Y.1540: ‘Internet protocol data communication service — IP packet transfer and availability performance parameters’, (2002).

  11. 11

    ITU-T Recommendation Y.1541: ‘Network performance objectives for IP-based services’, (2002).

  12. 12

    Mustill D and Willis P J: ‘Delivering QoS in the next generation network — a standards perspective’, BT Technol J, 23, No2, pp 48–60 (April 2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    IETF RFC1889: ‘RTP: A transport protocol for real-time applications’, (1996).

  14. 14

    ITU-T Recommendation P.11: ‘Effect of transmission impairments’, (1993).

  15. 15

    ITU-T Recommendation P.862: ‘Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrowband telephone networks and speech codecs’, (2003).

  16. 16

    ITU-T Recommendation P.800: ‘Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality’, (1996).

  17. 17

    ITU-T Handbook on Telephonometry, Geneva (1993).

  18. 18

    ITU-T Recommendation P.800.1: ‘Mean Opinion Score (MOS) terminology’, (2003).

  19. 19

    ITU-T Recommendation G.107: ‘The E-Model, a computational model for use in transmission planning’, (2003).

  20. 20

    ITU-T Recommendation G.113: ‘Transmission impairments due to speech processing’, (2001).

  21. 21

    ITU-T Recommendation P.833: ‘Methodology for derivation of equipment impairment factors from subjective listening-only tests’, (2001).

  22. 22

    Gilbert E N: ‘Capacity of a burst-noise channel’, Bell Syst Tech J, 39, pp 1253–1265 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Jiang W and Schulzrinne H: ‘Comparisons of FEC and codec robustness on VoIP quality and bandwidth efficiency’, ICN (2002).

  24. 24

    IETF RFC2733: ‘An RTP payload format for generic forward error correction’, (1999).

  25. 25

    ITU-T Recommendation G.114: ‘One-way transmission time’, (2003).

  26. 26

    Kitawaki N and Itoh K: IEEE J on Sel Areas in Commun, JSAC, 9, No4, pp 586–593 (May 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Carter S F: ‘QoS in BT’s MPLS-VPN platforms’, BT Technol J, 23, No2, pp 61–72 (April 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Naylor W E and Kleinrock L: IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-30, No12, pp 2527–2534 (December 1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Ramjee R, Kurose J, Towsley D and Schulzrinne H: ‘Adaptative playout mechanisms for packetized audio applications in wide-area networks’, IEEE INFOCOM’94, Toronto, pp 680–688 (June 1994).

  30. 30

    Narbutt M and Murphy L: ‘VoIP playout buffer adjustment using adaptive estimation of network delays’, Proc International Teletraffic Congress ITC-18, Berlin, Germany (August–September 2003).

  31. 31

    ETSI: ‘2nd speech quality test event, anonymized test report’, (2002).

  32. 32

    Ofcom NICC DOC 00/013, NPDS7(94)4: ‘Recommended standard for the national transmission plan for public networks’, — http://www.nicc.org.uk/nicc-public/Public/specs/npdsv3g.doc

  33. 33

    ITU-T Recommendation T.38: ‘Procedures for real-time Group 3 facsimile communication over IP networks’, (2004).

  34. 34

    ITU-T Recommendation V.150.1: ‘Modem-over-IP networks: Procedures for the end-to-end connection of V-series DCEs’, (2003).

  35. 35

    IETF RFC2598: ‘An expedited forwarding PHB’, (1999).

  36. 36

    ITU-T Recommendation I.231.1: ‘Circuit-mode 64 kbit/s unrestricted, 8 kHz structured bearer service’, (1988).

  37. 37

    ITU-T Recommendation G.826: ‘End-to-end error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit-rate digital paths and connections’, (2002).

  38. 38

    Clark J A and McDonald J: ‘An introduction to policy management’, BT Technol J, 23, No2, pp 118–129 (April 2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Hunt, G., Arden, P. QoS requirements for a voice-over-IP PSTN. BT Technol J 23, 37–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10550-005-0005-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Packet Loss
  • Human Computer Interaction
  • Packet Transmission
  • Planning Model
  • Voice Quality