Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Targeted axillary dissection: worldwide variations in clinical practice

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) for the axillary staging of clinically node-positive (cN +) breast cancer patients converting to clinically node negative post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), has gained popularity due to its minimal false negative rate and low arm morbidity. The aim of this study is to shed more light on the variation in the clinical practice globally in terms of indications and perceived limitations of TAD.

Methods

A panel of expert breast surgeons constructed a structured questionnaire comprising of 18 questions and asked surgeons worldwide for their opinions and routine practice on TAD. The questionnaire was electronically distributed and answers were collected between May 1st and August 1st 2022.

Results

Responses included 137 entries from 36 countries. Of them, 73.7% consider TAD for cN + patients planned to receive NAC. Among them, the greatest number of respondents (45%) perform the procedure for tumours up to T3, whereas 27% regardless of T-stage. The majority (42%) perform TAD on patients with 1–3 positive nodes and only 30% consider TAD when matted nodes are present. HER2 positive and Triple Negative subtypes are more likely to undergo TAD than Luminal A and B (86%, 79.1%, 39.5%, and 62.8%, respectively). Maximum acceptable lymph node burden is median 3 nodes for any subtype with a tendency to accept more positive nodes for Triple Negative.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the differences in current practice regarding TAD as well as the fact that the biology of the tumour heavily affects the method of axillary staging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to personally identifiable information included, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rubio IT, Zackrisson S, Senkus E, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Committee. Early breast cancer, ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up. https://www.esmo.org/content/download/284512/5623447/1/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-Slideset-Early-Breast-Cancer.pdf.Accessed 6 Jan 2023

  2. Friedrich M, Kühn T, Janni W, Müller V, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Albert US, Bauerfeind I et al (2021) AGO recommendations for the surgical therapy of the axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 2021 update. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 81:1112–1120. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1499-8431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. NCCN guidelines, Version 4.2022, June 21, 2022. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2023

  4. Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Gilcrease MZ, Bedrosian I, Hobbs BP, DeSnyder SM, Hwang RF et al (2016) Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol 34:1072–1078. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.64.0094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gasparri ML, de Boniface J, Poortmans P, Gentilini O, Kaidar-Person O, Paluchowski-Banys M, Di Micco R, Niinikoski L, Murawa D, Bonci EA et al (2022) Axillary surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in initially node-positive breast cancer: international EUBREAST survey. Br J Surg 10:857–863. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee J, Jung JH, Kim WW, Kang B, Keum H, Chae YS, Lee SJ, Park JY, Park NJ, Jung TD, Park HY (2023) Ten-year oncologic outcomes in T1–3N1 breast cancer after targeted axillary sampling: a retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 30(8):4669–4677. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13191-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simons JM, van Nijnatten TJA, van der Pol CC, Luiten EJT, Koppert LB, Smidt ML (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of different surgical procedures for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 269(3):432–442. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pilewskie M, Morrow M (2017) Axillary nodal management following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol 3:549–555. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkilesis G, Constantinidou A, Kontos M (2021) False negativity of targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 16:532–538. https://doi.org/10.1159/000513037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song YX, Xu Z, Liang MX, Liu Z, Hou JC, Chen X, Xu D, Fei YJ, Tang JH (2022) Diagnostic accuracy of de-escalated surgical procedure in axilla for node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 11(22):4085–4103. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kühn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, Lebeau A, Liedtke C, von Minckwitz G, Nekljudova V et al (2013) Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol 14:609–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70166-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B, Leitch MA, Kuerer HM, Bowling M, Filippo-Morton TS et al (2013) Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA 310:1455–1461. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.278932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Simons JM, van Nijnatten TJ, van der Pol CC, van Diest PJ, Jager A, van Klaveren D, Kam BLR, Lobbes MBI, de Boer M, Verhoef C et al (2022) Diagnostic accuracy of radioactive iodine seed placement in the axilla with sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer. JAMA Surg 157:991–999. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3907

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim WH, Kim HJ, Kim SH, Jung JH, Park HY, Lee J, Kim WW, Park JY, Chae YS, Lee SJ (2019) Ultrasound-guided dual-localization for axillary nodes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with clip and activated charcoal in breast cancer patients: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer 19:859. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6095-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim WH, Kim HJ, Jung JH, Park HY, Lee J, Kim WW, Park JY, Chae YS, Lee SJ (2018) Ultrasound-guided restaging and localization of axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for guidance of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients: experience with activated charcoal. Ann Surg Oncol 25:494–500. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6250-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Banys-Paluchowski M, Gasparri ML, de Boniface J et al (2021) Surgical management of the axilla in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients converting to clinical node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy: current status, knowledge gaps, and rationale for the EUBREAST-03 AXSANA study. Cancers 13:1565. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071565

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuemmel S, Heil J, Rueland A, Seiberling C, Harrach H, Schindowski D, Lubitz J, Hellerhoff K, Ankel C, Grasshoff ST et al (2022) A prospective, multicenter registry study to evaluate the clinical feasibility of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) in node-positive breast cancer patients. Ann Surg 276:e553–e562. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartmann S, Kühn T, de Boniface J, Stachs A, Winckelmann A, Frisell J, Wiklander-Bråkenhielm I, Stubert J, Gerber B, Reimer T (2021) Carbon tattooing for targeted lymph node biopsy after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer: prospective multicentre TATTOO trial. BJS 108:302–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaa083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Donker M, Straver ME, Wesseling J, Loo CE, Schot M, Drukker CA, van Tinteren H, Sonke GS, Rutgers EJT, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD (2015) Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients. The MARI Procedure Ann Surg 261:378–382. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Samiei S, Simons JM, Engelen SME, Beets-Tan RGH, Classe JM, Smidt ML (2021) Axillary pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy by breast cancer subtype in patients with initially clinically node-positive disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 156: e210891. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0891

  21. Natsiopoulos I, Intzes S, Liappis T, Zarampoukas K, Zarampoukas T, Zacharopoulou V, Papazisis K (2019) Axillary lymph node tattooing and targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer patients who presented as cN+ before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and became cN0 after treatment. Clin Breast Cancer 19:208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2019.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Forsthuber E, Sir A (2021) The applicability of Magseed® for targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 57:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.03.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker JL, Haji F, Kusske AM, Fischer CP, Hoyt AC, Thompson CK, Lee MK, Attai D, DiNome ML (2022) SAVI SCOUT® localization of metastatic axillary lymph node prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for targeted axillary dissection: a pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 191:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06416-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuemmel S, Heil J, Bruzas S et al (2023) Safety of targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer. JAMA Surg (epub) e231772. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1772

  25. Galimberti V, Ribeiro Fontana SK, Vicini E, Morigi C, Sargenti M, Corso G, Magnoni F, Intra M, Veronesi P (2022) This house believes that: sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients. Breast 67:21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kahler-Ribeiro-Fontana S, Pagan E, Magnoni F, Vicini E, Morigi C, Corso G, Intra M, Canegallo F, Ratini S, Leonardi MC, La Rocca E, Bagnardi V, Montagna E, Colleoni M, Viale G, Bottiglieri L, Grana CM, Biasuz JV, Veronesi P, Galimberti V (2021) Long-term standard sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer: a single institution ten-year follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol 47(4):804–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Martelli G, Barretta F, Miceli R, Folli S, Maugeri I, Listorti C, Scaperrotta G, Baili P, Pruneri G, Capri G, Ferraris C (2022) Sentinel node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection in breast cancer patients after primary chemotherapy: long-term results of a prospective interventional study. Ann Surg 276(5):e544–e552. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong SM, Basik M, Florianova L, Margolese R, Dumitra S, Muanza T, Carbonneau A, Ferrario C, Boileau JF (2021) Oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 28(5):2621–2629. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09211-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barrio AV, Montagna G, Mamtani A, Sevilimedu V, Edelweiss M, Capko D, Cody HS 3rd, El-Tamer M, Gemignani ML, Heerdt A, Kirstein L, Moo TA, Pilewskie M, Plitas G, Sacchini V, Sclafani L, Tadros A, Van Zee KJ, Morrow M (2021) Nodal recurrence in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with sentinel node biopsy alone after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-a rare event. JAMA Oncol 7(12):1851–1855. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Piltin MA, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Davis J Jr, Boughey JC (2020) Oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 27(12):4795–4801. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08900-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goyal A, Cramp S, Marshall A, Hammonds N, Wheatley D, Elsberger B, Puri S, Homer T, Vale L, Butt R, et al (2022) ATNEC: A multicenter, randomized trial investigating whether axillary treatment can be avoided in patients with T1–3N1M0 breast cancer with no residual cancer in the lymph glands after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. JCO 40:16 supl, TPS615. https://ascopubs.org/doi/pdf/https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.TPS615

Download references

Acknowledgements

Collaborators of TAD Study Group: Argentina: Eduardo Gonzalez (Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo). Australia: Melanie Walker (Alfred Health), AJ Collins (ANU), MT Nano (Australia), Kim Heron (Barwon Health), Beth Penington (Bendigo hospital), Mike He (Calvary Health Care ACT), Norman Janu (Concord Hospital), Katrina Read (Dr Katrina Read), Jose Cid Fernandez (Fiona Stanley Hospital, Western Australia), Belinda Brown (Frankston Hospital), Aashit Shah (LH), Kylie Snook (Mater Sydney), Sarah Forsyth (Prince of Wales Hospital), Janne Bingham (Royal Adelaide Hospital), Jocelyn Lippey (St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne), Joel Symonds (Strathfield Private Hospital), Alec Winder (Townsville hospital), Nita Bartlett (Townsville University Hospital and Mater private), Petar Vujovic (Wesley Breast & Endocrine Centre), Jenny Gough (Wesley Hospital), Sarah Birks (Alfred Health), Farid Meybodi (BCU), Saud Hamza (Fiona Stanley Hospital), Elisabeth Elder (Westmead Breast Cancer Institute). Austria: Heidi Stranzl (Medical University of Graz). Azerbaijan: Tahmina Kosayeva (Azerbaijan Medical University). Belgium: Glenn Vergauwen (Ghent University Hospital). Chile: Jaime Letzkus (San Borja Arriaran Clinical hospital). Colombia: Gilberto Benitez (Clínica Oncológica Aurora), Eduardo Cabrera (Hospital San Juan de Dios). Cyprus: Evros Kitiris (The Breast Center of Cyprus), Michalis Kailides (The Breast Center of Cyprus). Ecuador: Patricio Corral (Centro Integral de Patología Mamaria (CIPAM)). Egypt: Khaled Mohamed Abdelwahab Ali (Mansoura oncology center – Mansoura university). Finland: Laura Niinikoski (Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Breast Surgery). Germany: Kerstin Weinand (Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg), Stephan Hasmüller (Kreisklinik Ebersberg), Conny Kurz (Klinikum Esslingen), Hans-Christian Kolberg (Marienhospital Bottrop GmbH), Ingo Thalmann (Siloah St. Trudpert Klinikum Pforzheim), Maggie Banys-Paluchowski (UKSH Lübeck). Greece: Aikaterini Manika (Athinaiki Mediclinic), Vasileios Venizelos (Breast Unit Metropolitan Hospital), Georgios Metaxas (Elena Venizelou Hospital), Lazaros Papadopoulos (Iaso B Breast Unit ), Ioannis Natsiopoulos (Interbalkan Medical Center), Eleftheria Ignatiadou (Metaxa Memorial Hospital), Rodoniki Iosifidou (Theagenio Anticancer Hospital), Ioannis Askoksilakis (University Hospital Heraklion ), Nikolaos Michalopoulos (University of Athens), Grigorios Xepapadakis (Breast Clinic, REA Hospital, Piraeus). Hong Kong: Serena Yu Yan Wong (Queen Elizabeth Hospital). India: Karishma Kirti (DY Patil Hospital). Iran: Roghieh Nooripour (Alzahra University). Italy: Alessandra invento (AOUI VERONA chirurgia senologica), Lea Regolo (Asst-Melegnano-Martesana, Vizzolo Hospital), Corrado Chiappa (ASST-settelaghi – Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi di Varese), Maria-Grazia Lazzaretti (AUSL Modena), Andrea Sibilio (AUSL Romagna), Viviana-Enrica Galimberti (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IEO), Denise Mattar (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IEO), Silvia Michieletto (Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Rosa Di Micco (San Raffaele University and Research Hospital), Teresa Di Palma (Santa Maria Goretti Latina), Oreste D. Gentilini (San Raffaele University and Research Hospital), Nicola Rocco (University of Naples Federico II), Mauro Porpiglia (Breast Unit S. Anna Hospital – Torino). Kuwait: Mervat Alsaleh (Kuwait university), Ibtisam Albader (Mubarak H). Mexico: Sergio Aguilar-Villanueva (Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia). Netherlands: Emiel Rutges (Netherlands Cancer Institute). New Zealand: Eva Juhasz (North Shore Hospital, Auckland), Nicola Davis (Tauranga Hospital), Stan Govender (St Marks Breast Centre). Palestine: Khaled Sharaf (Augusta Victoria Hospital). Peru: Lia Pamela Rebaza Vasquez (Oncosalud). Philippines: Aldine Basa (The Medical city). Poland: Dawid Murawa (General Surgery and Surgical Oncology Clinic; University Hospita Zielona Gora). Portugal: David Pinto (Champalimaud Foundation). Romania: Bonci Eduard-Alexandru (“Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta” Institute of Oncology), Florin Bobirca (Dr I Cantacuzino Clinical Hospital), Elena Adelina Toma (Elias Emergency Hospital), Bogdan Diaconescu (Emergency Clinical Hospital Bucharest), Radu Mihail Mirica (Emergency Hospital Saint John, Bucharest), Adrian Udrea (Medisprof cancer center), Silvia Brotea-Mosoiu (Oncology institute of aidrest), Gabriel Dimofte (Regional Institute of Oncology Iasi), Lunca Sorinel (Regional Institute of Oncology Iasi), Octav Ginghina (Emergency Hospital Saint John, Bucharest), Gata Vlad Alexandru (The Institute of Oncology Cluj), Mihai-Stefan Muresan (Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicover Hospital), Ana-Maria Musina (Regional Institute of Oncology). Saudi Arabia: Lolwah Alriyees (KAMC). Singapore: Chi Wei Mok (Changi General Hospital). Slovenia: Andraz Perhavec (Institute of Oncology Ljubljana). Spain: Laura Comin (Hospital general de Teruel Obispo Polanco), José Ignacio Sánchez-Méndez (HospitalUniversitario La Paz), Gloria Ortega-Perez (MD Anderson Cancer Center. Madrid). Sweden: Jana De Boniface (Capio St Goran’s Hospital), Ira Oikonomou (Karolinska), Andreas Karakatsanis (Uppsala University Hospital). Switzerland: Christoph Tausch (Breast Center Zurich), Walter Weber (University Hospital Basel), Maria-Luisa Gasparri (Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano). Turkey: Ahmet Necati Sanli (Abdulkadir Yuksel State Hospital), Seymur Abdullayev (Bakırköy Dr. aid Konuk REC), Melek Gokova (Izmir Ataturk Researge and Training Hospital), Abut Kebudi (Okan University Medical Faculty), Gultekin Ozan Kucuk (Samsun Training and Research Hospital), Baha Zengel (University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital), Tolga Kalayci (Erzurum City Hospital), Lutfi Dogan (Oncology hospital), Betul Bozkurt (Private office), Semra Gunay (Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu Şehir Hastanesi Istanbul). United Kingdom: Elina Shaari (Guy’s Hospital, London), Ashutosh Kothari (Guys & St Thomas NHS Trust), Manas Dube (Kings Mill Hospital), Chloe Constantinou (Kingston), Teresa Fernandez Cuadrafo (NHS LOTHIAN, Edinburgh Breast Unit), Jane Macaskill (NHS Tayside), Hazem Khout (Nottingham breast institute), Anupama Nagarajakumar (PRUH, KCH), Rob Milligan (Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead), Laura Arthur (Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley), Ricardo Pardo (Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust), Peter Barry (Royal Marsden hospital), Emanuele Garreffa (University Hospitals of Derby and Burton). USA: Jill Dietz (Allegheny Health Network), Shawna Willey (INOVA Schar Cancer Institute), Judy Boughey (Mayo clinic), Susan Boolbol (Nuvance Health), Anne Peled (Sutter Health CPMC)

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by PK and MK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prodromos Kanavidis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

Author TK has received speaker’s honoraria from Merit Medical, Hologic, Endomag, and Sirius Medical. Author BG has received honoraria from Roche and MSD. The other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This is an observational study and no ethical approval is required.

Consent to participate

This study does not involve patients as subjects. All study participants consent to publication of the responses they provided.

Consent to publish

No individual patient’s data are published in any form.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Collaborators of TAD Study Group are provided in Acknowledgements section.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kontos, M., Kanavidis, P., Kühn, T. et al. Targeted axillary dissection: worldwide variations in clinical practice. Breast Cancer Res Treat 204, 389–396 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07204-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07204-7

Keywords

Navigation