Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating the incidence of breast cancer recurrence using administrative data

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, but most cancer registries do not capture recurrences. We estimated the incidence of local, regional, and distant recurrences using administrative data.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with stage I-III primary breast cancer in Ontario, Canada from 2013 to 2017 were included. Patients were followed until 31/Dec/2021, death, or a new primary cancer diagnosis. We used hospital administrative data (diagnostic and intervention codes) to identify local recurrence, regional recurrence, and distant metastasis after primary diagnosis. We used logistic regression to explore factors associated with developing a distant metastasis.

Results

With a median follow-up 67 months, 5,431/45,857 (11.8%) of patients developed a distant metastasis a median 23 (9, 42) months after diagnosis of the primary tumor. 1086 (2.4%) and 1069 (2.3%) patients developed an isolated regional or a local recurrence, respectively. Patients with distant metastatic disease had a median overall survival of 15.4 months (95% CI 14.4–16.4 months) from the time recurrence/metastasis was identified. In contrast, the median survival for all other patients was not reached. Patients were more likely to develop a distant metastasis if they had more advanced stage, greater comorbidity, and presented with symptoms (p < 0.0001). Trastuzumab halved the risk of recurrence [OR 0.53 (0.45–0.63), p < 0.0001].

Conclusion

Distant metastasis is not a rare outcome for patients diagnosed with breast cancer, translating to an annual incidence of 2132 new cases (17.8% of all breast cancer diagnoses). Overall survival remains high for patients with locoregional recurrences, but was poor following a diagnosis of a distant metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Ontario Health is prohibited from making the data used in this research publicly accessible if it includes potentially identifiable personal health information and/or personal information as defined in Ontario law, specifically the Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) and the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). Upon request, data de-identified to a level suitable for public release may be provided.

References

  1. Warren J, Yabroff K (2015) Challenges and opportunities in measuring cancer recurrence in the United States: PubMed: NCBI. J Natl Cancer Inst 107:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vuksanovic D, Sanmugarajah J, Lunn D, Sawhney R, Eu K, Liang R (2021) Unmet needs in breast cancer survivors are common, and multidisciplinary care is underutilised: the Survivorship Needs Assessment Project. Breast Cancer 28(2):289–297

  3. Koch L, Bertram H, Eberle A et al (2014) Fear of recurrence in long-term breast cancer survivors: still an issue. Results on prevalence, determinants, and the association with quality of life and depression from the cancer survivorship: a multi-regional population-based study. Psychooncology 23(5):547–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mariotto AB, Etzioni R, Hurlbert M, Penberthy L, Mayer M (2017) Estimation of the number of women living with metastatic breast cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 26(6):809–815

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Muradali D, Kennedy EB, Eisen A, Holloway CMB, Smith CR, Chiarelli AM (2017) Breast screening for survivors of breast cancer: a systematic review. Prev Med (Baltim) 103:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Darby S, McGale P, Correa C et al (2011) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 378(9804):1707–1716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong Y, Zhang WW, Wang J, Sun JY, He ZY, Wu SG (2019) The 21-gene recurrence score and effects of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in early-stage breast cancer. Futur Oncol 15(14):1629–1639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradley R, Burrett J, Clarke M et al (2015) Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet 386(10001):1341–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI et al (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13(15):4429–4434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Siotos C, Naska A, Bello RJ et al (2019) Survival and disease recurrence rates among breast cancer patients following mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(2):169e–177e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Voogd AC, Nielsen M, Peterse JL et al (2001) Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: pooled results of two large European randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 19(6):1688–1697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chubak J, Yu O, Pocobelli G et al (2012) Administrative data algorithms to identify second breast cancer events following early-stage invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(12):931–940

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu Y, Kong S, Cheung WY et al (2019) Development and validation of case-finding algorithms for recurrence of breast cancer using routinely collected administrative data. BMC Cancer 19:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritzwoller DP, Hassett MJ, Uno H et al (2018) Development, validation, and dissemination of a breast cancer recurrence detection and timing informatics algorithm. J Natl Cancer Inst 110(3):273–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mariotto AB, Zou Z, Zhang F, Howlader N, Kurian AW, Etzioni R (2018) Can we use survival data from cancer registries to learn about disease recurrence? The case of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27(11):1332–1341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Haque R, Shi J, Schottinger JE et al (2015) A hybrid approach to identify subsequent breast cancer using pathology and automated health information data. Med Care 53(4):380–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Habbous S, Homenauth E, Barisic A et al (2022) Differences in breast cancer diagnosis by patient presentation in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study. C Open 10(2):E313–E330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Padmanabhan N, Subramanyan A, Radhakrishna S (2015) Synchronous bilateral breast cancers. J Clin Diagnostic Res 9(9):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  19. Botteri E, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N et al (2009) Analysis of local regional recurrences in breast cancer after conservative surgery. Ann Oncol 21(4):723–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo C, Zhong X, Deng L, Xie Y, Hu K, Zheng H (2019) Nomogram predicting locoregional recurrence to assist decision-making of postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with T1–2N1 breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 103(4):905–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tovar JR, Zandonade E, Amorim MHC (2014) Factors associated with the incidence of local recurrences of breast cancer in women who underwent conservative surgery. Int J Breast Cancer 2014:639534

  22. Spronk I, Schellevis FG, Burgers JS, de Bock GH, Korevaar JC (2018) Incidence of isolated local breast cancer recurrence and contralateral breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast 39:70–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Geurts YM, Witteveen A, Bretveld R et al (2017) Patterns and predictors of first and subsequent recurrence in women with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 165(3):709–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hassett MJ, Ritzwoller DP, Taback N et al (2014) Validating billing/encounter codes as indicators of lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer recurrence using two large contemporary cohorts. Med Care 52(10):e65–e73

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Warren JL, Mariotto A, Melbert D et al (2016) Sensitivity of Medicare claims to identify cancer recurrence in elderly colorectal and breast cancer patients. Med Care 54(8):e47–e54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wapnir IL, Khan A (2019) Current strategies for the management of locoregional breast cancer recurrence. Oncol (United States) 33(1):19–25

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rasmussen LA, Jensen H, Virgilsen LF, Thorsen LBJ, Offersen BV, Vedsted P (2019) A validated algorithm for register-based identification of patients with recurrence of breast cancer—based on danish breast cancer group (DBCG) data. Cancer Epidemiol 59:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Holloway CMB, Shabestari O, Eberg M et al (2022) Identifying breast cancer recurrence in administrative data: algorithm development and validation. Curr Oncol 29(8):5338–5367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kroenke CH, Chubak J, Johnson L, Castillo A, Weltzien E, Caan BJ (2016) Enhancing breast cancer recurrence algorithms through selective use of medical record data. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 108(3):336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Habbous S, Forster K, Darling G et al (2020) Incidence and real-world burden of brain metastases from solid tumors and hematologic malignancies in Ontario: a population-based study. Neuro-oncology Adv 3:1

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ontario Cancer Statistics 2020. 2020. https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/statistical-reports/ontario-cancer-statistics-2020/ch-1-estimated-current-cancer-incidence. Accessed November 11, 2020

  32. Pagani O, Senkus E, Wood W et al (2010) International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: can metastatic breast cancer be cured? JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 102(7):456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Coleman M, Forman D, Bryant H et al (2011) Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 377(9760):127–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Miksad RA, Zietemann V, Gothe R et al (2008) Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in advanced breast cancer. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 24(4):371–383

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kemp R, Prasad V (2017) Surrogate endpoints in oncology: When are they acceptable for regulatory and clinical decisions, and are they currently overused? BMC Med 15:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Fischer A, Latimer N (2018) Challenges and methodologies in using progression free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in oncology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 34(3):300–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Seely JM, Alhassan T (2018) Screening for breast cancer in 2018—what should we be doing today? Curr Oncol 25(Suppl 1):S115–S124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jones T, Duquette D, Underhill M et al (2018) Surveillance for cancer recurrence in long-term young breast cancer survivors randomly selected from a statewide cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 169(1):141–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zeng Z, Espino S, Roy A et al (2018) Using natural language processing and machine learning to identify breast cancer local recurrence. BMC Bioinformatics 19(Suppl 17):498

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI). However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the author, and not necessarily those of CIHI. We acknowledge support of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in this report. All views expressed are those of the authors of this report and do not necessarily reflect those of Ontario or the Ministry.

Funding

No specific funding sources were used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed substantially to this work, including conception and study design (SH, KF, AE, CH, SK), analysis (SH, EH, AB), and manuscript preparation (all).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Habbous.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All co-authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethics approval

Research ethics was not required as per the Ontario Health privacy office.

Consent to participate

Patient consent was not required for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1791 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Habbous, S., Barisic, A., Homenauth, E. et al. Estimating the incidence of breast cancer recurrence using administrative data. Breast Cancer Res Treat 198, 509–522 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06812-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06812-z

Keywords

Navigation