Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overcoming disparities: Multidisciplinary breast cancer care at a public safety net hospital

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Public safety net hospitals (SNH) serve a disparate patient population; however, little is known about long-term oncologic outcomes of patients receiving care at these facilities. This study is the first to examine overall survival (OS) and the initiation of treatment in breast cancer patients treated at a SNH.

Methods

Patients presenting to a SNH with stage I-IV breast cancer from 2005 to 2017 were identified from the local tumor registry. The hospital has a weekly breast tumor board and a multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer care. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to identify patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics associated with OS. Factors with a p < 0.1 were included in the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

2709 breast cancer patients were evaluated from 2005 to 2017. The patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatments received were analyzed. Five-year OS was 78.4% (93.9%, 87.4%, 70.9%, and 23.5% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively). On multivariable analysis, higher stage, age > 70 years, higher grade, and non-Hispanic ethnicity were associated with worse OS. Patients receiving surgery (HR = 0.33, p < 0.0001), chemotherapy (HR = 0.71, p = 0.006), and endocrine therapy (HR = 0.61, p < 0.0001) had better OS compared to those who did not receive these treatments.

Conclusion

Despite serving a vulnerable minority population that is largely poor, uninsured, and presenting with more advanced disease, OS at our SNH approaches national averages. This novel finding indicates that in the setting of multidisciplinary cancer care and with appropriate initiation of treatment, SNHs can overcome socioeconomic barriers to achieve equitable outcomes in breast cancer care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Genther DJ, Gourin CG (2012) The effect of hospital safety-net burden status on short-term outcomes and cost of care after head and neck cancer surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(11):1015–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mouch CA et al (2014) The quality of surgical care in safety net hospitals: a systematic review. Surgery 155(5):826–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoehn RS et al (2016) Effect of hospital safety-net burden on cost and outcomes after surgery. JAMA Surg 151(2):120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewin ME (2000) A.S., America's health care safety-net: intact but endangered, M.C. committee on the changing market, and the future viability of safety-net providers; Institute of Medicine, editor. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bazzoli GJ et al (2012) The effects of safety net hospital closures and conversions on patient travel distance to hospital services. Health Serv Res 47(1 Pt 1):129–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mobley L, Kuo TM, Bazzoli GJ (2011) Erosion in the healthcare safety net: impacts on different population groups. Open Health Serv Policy J 4:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Virgo KS et al (2011) Safety-net burden hospitals and likelihood of curative-intent surgery for non-small cell lung cancer. J Am Coll Surg 213(5):633–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradley CJ et al (2008) Differences in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment: experiences of insured and uninsured women in a safety-net setting. Inquiry 45(3):323–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley CJ et al (2012) Surgery wait times and specialty services for insured and uninsured breast cancer patients: does hospital safety net status matter? Health Serv Res 47(2):677–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McHugh M, Kang R, Hasnain-Wynia R (2009) Understanding the safety net: inpatient quality of care varies based on how one defines safety-net hospitals. Med Care Res Rev 66(5):590–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shields AE (2007) Trends in private insurance, Medicaid/state Children's health insurance program, and the health-care safety net: implications for asthma disparities. Chest 132(5 Suppl):818s–830s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Halpern MT et al (2008) Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 9(3):222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McLaughlin JM et al (2012) Effect on survival of longer intervals between confirmed diagnosis and treatment initiation among low-income women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(36):4493–4500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Neugut AI et al (2012) The breast Cancer quality of care study (BQUAL): a multi-center study to determine causes for noncompliance with breast cancer adjuvant therapy. Breast J 18(3):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elmore JG et al (2005) Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment. Med Care 43(2):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Silber JH et al (2013) Characteristics associated with differences in survival among black and white women with breast cancer. Jama 310(4):389–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chagpar AB et al (2011) Primary tumor size, not race, determines outcomes in women with hormone-responsive breast cancer. Surgery 150(4):796–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hershman D et al (2005) Racial disparities in treatment and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(27):6639–6646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gorin SS et al (2006) Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by racial/ethnic group. Arch Intern Med 166(20):2244–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jackson Health System Website. (cited 2020 2/22/2020); Available from: https://jacksonhealth.org/

  21. JMH Breast Health Center Website. 2/22/20]; Available from: https://jacksonhealth.org/jackson-memorial/radiology-breast-health-center

  22. National Cancer Data Base Breast Cancer PUF. (2004-2015) American cancer society, Commission on cancer of the American college of surgeons

  23. Ross JS et al (2007) Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction at urban safety-net hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 26(1):238–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C (2001) Disparities in cancer diagnosis and survival. Cancer 91(1):178–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bureau, U.C. 2010 Census Quick Facts. 2/24/2020]; Available from: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/RHI225218

  26. Taplin SH et al (2015) Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness. J Oncol Pract 11(3):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fennell ML et al (2010) The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010(40):72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kesson EM et al (2012) Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women. Bmj 344:e2718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ju M et al (2020) Multidisciplinary teams improve gastric Cancer treatment efficiency at a large safety net hospital. Ann Surg Oncol 27(3):645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duininck G et al (2019) Optimizing cancer care for hepatocellular carcinoma at a safety-net hospital: the value of a multidisciplinary disease management team. J Surg Oncol 120(8):1365–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). . SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2015, National Cancer Institute. . based on November 2017 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2018. [cited 2020; Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/

  32. Parise CA, Caggiano V (2015) The influence of socioeconomic status on racial/ethnic disparities among the ER/PR/HER2 breast Cancer subtypes. J Cancer Epidemiol 2015:813456

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Braithwaite D et al (2009) Hypertension is an independent predictor of survival disparity between African-American and white breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 124(5):1213–1219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tammemagi CM et al (2005) Comorbidity and survival disparities among black and white patients with breast cancer. Jama 294(14):1765–1772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Daly B, Olopade OI (2015) A perfect storm: how tumor biology, genomics, and health care delivery patterns collide to create a racial survival disparity in breast cancer and proposed interventions for change. CA Cancer J Clin 65(3):221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fejerman L et al (2008) Genetic ancestry and risk of breast cancer among U.S. Latinas. Cancer Res 68(23):9723–9728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dunning AM et al (2016) Breast cancer risk variants at 6q25 display different phenotype associations and regulate ESR1, RMND1 and CCDC170. Nat Genet 48(4):374–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. O'Brien KM et al (2010) Intrinsic breast tumor subtypes, race, and long-term survival in the Carolina breast Cancer study. Clin Cancer Res 16(24):6100–6110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chlebowski RT et al (2005) Ethnicity and breast cancer: factors influencing differences in incidence and outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(6):439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Joslyn SA, West MM (2000) Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival. Cancer 88(1):114–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR (2003) Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med 163(1):49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Daly B et al (2017) Evaluation of the quality of adjuvant endocrine therapy delivery for breast Cancer Care in the United States. JAMA Oncol 3(7):928–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Award—1K12CA226330-01 (Alan Pollack, Neha Goel).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Goel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Kristin N. Kelly, Alexandra Hernandez, Sina Yadegarynia, Emily Ryon, Dido Franceschi, Eli Avisar, Erin N. Kobetz, Nipun Merchant, Susan Kesmodel, Neha Goel declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelly, K.N., Hernandez, A., Yadegarynia, S. et al. Overcoming disparities: Multidisciplinary breast cancer care at a public safety net hospital. Breast Cancer Res Treat 187, 197–206 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-06044-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-06044-z

Keywords

Navigation