Skip to main content

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in 789 early and locally advanced breast cancer patients: The Royal Marsden experience

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment volume 179, pages 101–111 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer predicts the risk of recurrence and increasingly may indicate the need for additional therapy postoperatively.

Methods

We identified non-metastatic breast cancer patients receiving NACT during 2013–2017. Patients’ and disease characteristics, rates of pCR (ypT0-is ypN0), toxicities, dose delays and reductions, and survival outcomes were recorded.

Results

789 patients had median age of 50 years. 67.8% had stage II disease, 71.1% had grade 3 , and 91.8% had ductal histopathology. 32.8% had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, 25.5% had triple-negative (TN), and 38.0% HER2-positive disease. 6.8% received platinum. 48.2% of the HER2-positive patients received trastuzumab and pertuzumab and 51.8% received trastuzumab. Overall pCR rate was 33.5% and differed according to disease subtype, receptor status, grade, histology, and early discontinuation, but not according to age, dose reductions/delays, or year of treatment. The addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab marginally improved the pCR rates. Survival outcomes were better following pCR.

Conclusions

In our analysis, pCR rates are consistent with the published data. Even with contemporary therapies, many patients have residual disease following NACT, suggesting a significant risk of recurrence, and may benefit from additional postoperative systemic therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Gralow JR, Burstein HJ, Wood W, Hortobagyi GN, Gianni L, von Minckwitz G et al (2008) Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. J Clin Oncol 26(5):814–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N et al (2014) Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet (London, England). 384(9938):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Symmans WF, Wei C, Gould R, Yu X, Zhang Y, Liu M et al (2017) Long-term prognostic risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy associated with residual cancer burden and breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol 35(10):1049–1060

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A et al (2008) Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 26(5):778–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, Miller ID, Payne S, Gilbert FJ et al (2002) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 20(6):1456–1466

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Untch M, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A, Conrad B, Aktas B, Denkert C et al (2016) Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto-GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(3):345–356

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loibl S, O’Shaughnessy J, Untch M, Sikov WM, Rugo HS, McKee MD et al (2018) Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19(4):497–509

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, Singh B, Cirrincione CT, Tolaney SM et al (2015) Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 33(1):13–21

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, Salat C, Denkert C, Rezai M et al (2014) Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):747–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(1):25–32

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A et al (2016) 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 17(6):791–800

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Hegg R et al (2013) Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol 24(9):2278–2284

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Masuda N, Lee S-J, Ohtani S, Im Y-H, Lee E-S, Yokota I et al (2017) Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 376(22):2147–2159

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. von Minckwitz G, Huang C-S, Mano MS, Loibl S, Mamounas EP, Untch M et al (2019) Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 380(7):617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH et al (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3997–4013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Administration FaD (2007) Guidance for Industry Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics

  18. Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ (2007) Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005002.pub2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of The Royal Marsden NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Cancer.

Funding

The authors have no funding to report.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine – Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK

    Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Victoria True, Narda Chaabouni, Sophie McGrath, Mark Allen & Alistair Ring

  2. Department of Medicine – Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London, SW3 6JJ, UK

    Neha Chopra, Karla Lee, Scott Shepherd, Tal Shapira-Rotenberg, Rashi Joshi, Alicia Okines, Marina Parton, Nicholas Turner & Stephen Johnston

  3. Research and Development Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK

    Kabir Mohammed

Authors
  1. Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victoria True
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Narda Chaabouni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Neha Chopra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karla Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Scott Shepherd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tal Shapira-Rotenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rashi Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sophie McGrath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Alicia Okines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Marina Parton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nicholas Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Kabir Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Mark Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Stephen Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Alistair Ring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NMLB and AR conceived and designed the analysis. NMLB, VT, NaC, NeC, KL, SS, TSR, RJ collected the data. NMLB and KM performed the analysis. NMLB, AR, VT, NaC, NeC, KL, SS, TSR, RJ, NT, SM, MP, KM, MA, and SJ wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alistair Ring.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr Battisti has received travel grants from Genomic Health and Pfizer and speaker fees from Pfizer. Dr Ring has received advisory board fees from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, and Lilly; and speaker fees from Novartis and Pfizer. Prof Johnston has received consulting and advisory board fees from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Puma Biotechnology Pfizer, and Novartis; and speaker fees from Pfizer, Novartis, and Eisai; and research funding from Pfizer and Puma Biotechnology. Prof Turner has received research funding from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Roches, Tesaro, and Novartis. Dr Okines has received research funding from Pfizer and speaker fees from Roche. Dr McGrath has received travel grants from Genomic Health. Dr Parton, Dr Allen, Dr True, Dr Chaabouni, Dr Chopra, Dr Lee, Dr Shepherd, Dr Shapira-Rotenberg, Dr Joshi, and Mr Mohammed have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This analysis was approved as a Service Evaluation by The Committee for Clinical Review of The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust.

Informed consent

No individual person’s data are included in the manuscript in any form and therefore no consents for publication were required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Battisti, N.M.L., True, V., Chaabouni, N. et al. Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in 789 early and locally advanced breast cancer patients: The Royal Marsden experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 179, 101–111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05444-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05444-0

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • Pathological complete response
  • Early stage
  • Locally advanced