Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predictors of time to death after distant recurrence in breast cancer patients

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Background

After experiencing a distant recurrence, breast cancer patients have a poor prognosis; fewer than 5% survive for ten or more years. However, the time to death is highly variable, ranging from a few months to many years. The purpose of this study is to identify, in a large hospital-based series of patients with early-stage breast cancer, factors which predict survival after distant recurrence.

Methods

We studied a cohort of 2312 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at Women’s College Hospital between 1987 and 2000 (stages I–III). For each patient, we abstracted information on age at diagnosis, the initial presentation of the cancer (tumour size, lymph node status, tumour grade, ER status, PR status, HER2 status), treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy), the dates of all tumour recurrences (local, regional, distant) and the dates and causes of death. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the univariate and multivariate hazard ratios for death from breast cancer following distant recurrence associated with the various tumour features.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 12.8 years from diagnosis, 523 distant recurrences were recorded among women in the cohort (23% of 2312) and 604 women (26%) died of breast cancer. For the 484 women who had a distant recurrence on record and died of breast cancer, the mean time from distant recurrence to death was 2.0 years (range 0–11.9 years). In a multivariate analysis, only two factors were significantly associated with time to death after distant recurrence: ER status (positive vs. negative, HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.43–0.71; p < 0.0001) and tumour grade (high vs. low, HR 1.87; 95% CI 1.16–3.01; p = 0.01). Among ER-negative patients (N = 175), high tumour grade and a short time from diagnosis to distant recurrence were associated with a rapid time to death. Among ER-positive patients (N = 336), there was no significant independent predictor of time from recurrence to death.

Conclusions

Among ER-negative breast cancer patients, the time to death after distant recurrence was predictable to some extent; women with a short time from diagnosis to recurrence and/or with high-grade tumours were more likely to succumb to breast cancer within 3 years. Among ER-positive breast cancer patients who experience a distant recurrence, the time to death varies substantially and between patients could not be predicted by tumour factors or treatment. This suggests that for ER-positive patients, the factors that determine the time from diagnosis to distant recurrence do not predict the course of the cancer post-recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Schairer C, Mink PJ, Carroll L, Devesa SS (2004) Probabilities of death from breast cancer and other causes among female breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1311–1321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Narod S, Giannakeas V, Sopik V (2018) Time to death in breast cancer patients as an indicator of treatment response. Breast Cancer Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4935-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI et al (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13:4429–4434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J et al (2017) 20-year risks of breast-cancer recurrence after stopping endocrine therapy at 5 years. N Engl J Med 377:1836–1846

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tevaarwerk AJ, Gray RJ, Schneider BP et al (2013) Survival in patients with metastatic recurrent breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: little evidence of improvement over the past 30 years. Cancer 119:1140–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Redig AJ, McAllister SS (2013) Breast cancer as a systemic disease: a view of metastasis. J Intern Med 274:113–126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwast AB, Voogd AC, Menke-Pluijmers MB et al (2014) Prognostic factors for survival in metastatic breast cancer by hormone receptor status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:503–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuru B, Camlibel M, Dinc S, Gulcelik MA, Gonullu D, Alagol H (2008) Prognostic factors for survival in breast cancer patients who developed distant metastasis subsequent to definitive surgery. Singapore Med J 49:904–911

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Planchat E, Durando X, Abrial C et al (2011) Prognostic value of initial tumor parameters after metastatic relapse. Cancer Invest 29:635–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogoz B, Houzé de l’Aulnoit A, Duhamel A, Houzé de l’Aulnoit D (2018) Thirty-year trends of survival and time-varying effects of prognostic factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer-a single institution experience. Clin Breast Cancer 18:246–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiong Z, Deng G, Huang X et al (2018) Score for the survival probability in metastasis breast cancer: a nomogram-based risk assessment model. Cancer Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.443

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HJ, Ahn SG, Lee HM et al (2015) Metastasis-free interval is closely related to tumor characteristics and has prognostic value in breast cancer patients with distant relapse. J Breast Cancerm 18:371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Largillier R, Ferrero JM, Doyen J et al (2008) Prognostic factors in 1038 women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 19:2012–2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Women’s College Research Institute, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, M5S 1B2, ON, Canada

    Victoria Sopik, Ping Sun & Steven A. Narod

  2. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Victoria Sopik

  3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Steven A. Narod

Authors
  1. Victoria Sopik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ping Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven A. Narod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven A. Narod.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sopik, V., Sun, P. & Narod, S.A. Predictors of time to death after distant recurrence in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 173, 465–474 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-5002-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-5002-9

Keywords

search

Navigation