Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis
- 229 Downloads
Radial scars (RS) commonly present mammographically as architectural distortions, but these lesions may be associated with non-invasive and invasive breast cancer. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has resulted in higher detection rates of architectural distortion particularly in patients with dense breast tissue. We hypothesized that rates of clinically relevant lesions confirmed surgically would be lower in patients who received DBT imaging compared with those who received standard digital breast imaging.
We performed a retrospective review of 223 patients diagnosed with pure RS by core biopsy and surgical excision before and after DBT was introduced. The rate of upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesion was evaluated. Demographics, biopsy type, and histologic data were analyzed. Univariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables that may be associated with upgrading.
The rate of identifying RS increased from 0.04–.13% (P < 0.0001) with DBT imaging. The upgrade rate on surgical specimen to invasive or non-invasive cancer was similar before and after DBT; 6% versus 3%, as were findings of a high-risk lesion; 12% versus 22%. No predictive factors were identified for patients upgraded to malignant neoplasms or high-risk lesions.
The likelihood of identifying RS has increased with DBT imaging, but rates of upgrading to a malignant neoplasm or high-risk lesion were similar to those before DBT. Although the rate of upgrading to malignancy after DBT was low, an excisional biopsy should be considered as 22% of patients were upgraded to high-risk lesions. These patients are candidates for chemoprevention and/or high-risk surveillance.
KeywordsRadial scar Breast cancer Core biopsy Excisional biopsy Upgrade Digital breast tomosynthesis
We thank Geraldine M Chadwick, AuD, who provided medical writing support on behalf of the Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study has received ethical approval by the Carolinas HealthCare System Institutional Review Board as it satisfies requirements of 45 CFR 46 110, category #5.
This was a retrospective study. For this type of study, formal consent was not required by the IRB.
- 1.Schnitt S, Collins L (2017) Biopsy interpretation of the breast. vol 63. 3rd edn. (Epstein J (ed)). Boston: LWW; 2017Google Scholar
- 2.Tabar L, Dean P (2012) Teaching atlas of mammography, 4th edn. Thieme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210(3):799–805. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99mr19799 Google Scholar
- 6.Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Jain KS et al (2000) Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance. Radiology 216(3):831–837. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se31831 Google Scholar
- 7.Linda A, Zuiani C, Furlan A et al (2010) Radial scars without atypia diagnosed at imaging-guided needle biopsy: how often is associated malignancy found at subsequent surgical excision, and do mammography and sonography predict which lesions are malignant? Am J Roentgenol 194(4):1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2326 Google Scholar
- 22.Lång K, Nergården M, Andersson I et al (2016) False positives in breast cancer screening with one-view breast tomosynthesis: an analysis of findings leading to recall, work-up and biopsy rates in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Eur Radiol 26(11):3899–3907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4265-y Google Scholar
- 24.Sharpe RE, Venkataraman S, Phillips J et al (2016) Increased cancer detection rate and variations in the recall rate resulting from implementation of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis into a population-based screening program. Radiology 278(3):698–706. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142036 Google Scholar
- 25.Bianchi S, Giannotti E, Vanzi E et al (2012) Radial scar without associated atypical epithelial proliferation on image-guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: Analysis of 49 cases from a single-centre and review of the literature. The Breast 21(2):159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.09.005 Google Scholar
- 26.Resetkova E, Edelweiss M, Albarracin CT, Yang WT (2011) Management of radial sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed using percutaneous vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy: recommendations for excision based on seven years’ of experience at a single institution. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(2):335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0119-x Google Scholar
- 28.Becker L, Trop I, David J et al (2006) Management of radial scars found at percutaneous breast biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J 57(2):72–78. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16944680. Accessed July 15, 2018