Skip to main content

Including internal mammary lymph nodes in radiation therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer: an international survey of treatment technique and clinical priorities

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to understand the international standard practice for radiation therapy treatment techniques and clinical priorities for institutions including the internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) in the target volume for patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer.

Methods

An international survey was developed to include questions that would provide awareness of favored treatment techniques, treatment planning and delivery resource requirements, and the clinical priorities that may lead to the utilization of preferred treatment techniques.

Results

Of the 135 respondents, 82 indicated that IMLNs are regularly included in the target volume for radiation therapy (IMLN-inclusion) when the patient is otherwise generally indicated for regional nodal irradiation. Of the 82 respondents that regularly include IMLNs, five were removed as those respondents do not treat this population synchronously. Of the 77 respondents, institutional standard of care varied significantly, though VMAT (34%) and combined static photon and electron fields (21%) were the most commonly utilized techniques. Respondents did preferentially select target volume coverage (70%) as the most important clinical priority, followed by normal tissue sparing (25%).

Conclusion

The results of the survey indicate that the IMLN-inclusion for radiation therapy has not yet been comprehensively adopted. As well, no consensus on best practice for radiation therapy treatment techniques has been reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Jobsen JJ, van der Palen J, Ong F, Meerwaldt JH (2003) Synchronous, bilateral breast cancer: Prognostic value and incidence. Breast 12:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9776(02)00278-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kheirelseid EAH, Jumustafa H, Miller N et al (2011) Bilateral breast cancer: Analysis of incidence, outcome, survival and disease characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1057-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jobsen JJ, van der Palen J, Ong F et al (2015) Bilateral breast cancer, synchronous and metachronous; differences and outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153:277–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3538-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schwentner L, Wolters R, Wischnewsky M et al (2012) Survival of patients with bilateral versus unilateral breast cancer and impact of guideline adherent adjuvant treatment: A multi-centre cohort study of 5292 patients. Breast 21:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kim SJ, Lee MJ, Youn SM (2018) Radiation therapy of synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma (SBBC) using multiple techniques. Med Dosim 43:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2017.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Long K, Graham D, Roumeliotis M, Phan T (2016) Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and VMAT in patients with bilateral breast cancer with indications for adjuvant radiation. Radiother Oncol 120:S4–S5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(16)33410-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chia D, Yusoff SB, Chen D et al (2017) Strategies for bilateral breast and comprehensive nodal irradiation in breast cancer—a comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiation therapy. J Radiat Oncol 6:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-016-0280-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Verma V, Vicini F, Tendulkar RD et al (2016) Role of internal mammary node radiation as a part of modern breast cancer radiation therapy: a systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:617–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Thorsen LBJ, Offersen BV, Danø H et al (2016) DBCG-IMN: A Population-Based Cohort Study on the Effect of Internal Mammary Node Irradiation in Early Node-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:314–320. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Poortmans PM, Collette S, Kirkove C et al (2015) Internal Mammary and Medial Supraclavicular Irradiation in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 373:317–327. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Whelan TJ, Olivotto IA, Parulekar WR et al (2015) Regional Nodal Irradiation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 373:307–316. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415340

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Carmichael AR, Bendall S, Lockerbie L et al (2002) The long-term outcome of synchronous bilateral breast cancer is worse than metachronous or unilateral tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:388–391. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejso.2002.1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sejdinaj F, Yang W, Zhu W, Zhang H (2017) Breast-conserving therapy: An alternative to optimal cosmetic outcome and comparable prognosis in synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Surg Pract 21:86–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-1633.12246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hartman M, Czene K, Reilly M et al (2007) Incidence and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:4210–4216. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mani KR, Basu S, Bhuiyan MA et al (2017) Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy for synchronous bilateral breast irradiation using a mono iso-center technique. Polish J Med Phys Eng 23:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjmpe-2017-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Balaji Subramanian S, Balaji K, Thirunavukarasu M, Premkumar S (2016) Bilateral breast irradiation using hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (h-VMAT) technique: a planning case report. Cureus 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kaidar-Person O, Kostich M, Zagar TM et al (2016) Helical tomotherapy for bilateral breast cancer: clinical experience. Breast 28:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wadasadawala T, Visariya B, Sarin R et al (2015) Use of tomotherapy in treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer: dosimetric comparison study. Br J Radiol 88:20140612. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kopelson G, Munzenrider J, Doppke K, Wang CC (1981) Bilateral breast cancer: radiation therapy results and technical considerations. Cancer 7:335–341

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge all the survey respondents that participated in the survey. We would also like to thank ProKnow for hosting and distributing the survey.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Roumeliotis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any interventional studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roumeliotis, M., Long, K., Phan, T. et al. Including internal mammary lymph nodes in radiation therapy for synchronous bilateral breast cancer: an international survey of treatment technique and clinical priorities. Breast Cancer Res Treat 171, 471–475 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4848-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Synchronous
  • Bilateral
  • Survey
  • Radiation
  • Internal mammary lymph nodes
  • Regional nodal irradiation