Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 169, Issue 3, pp 639–640 | Cite as

Reply to Hollingsworth: does breast cancer metastasize in the clinical window between the mammogram and the mass?

  • Steven A. Narod
Rebuttal Letter
  • 72 Downloads
In our recent review, we proposed the parallel theory of breast cancer which, succinctly put, states that if a breast cancer is going to metastasize it will have done so before it is clinically apparent [ 1]. When I read Alan Hollingsworth’s excellent book Mammography and Early Breast Cancer Detection: How Screening Saves Lives [ 2] I realized that our hypothesis was a revisiting of early Fisher theory. Hollingsworth summarizes Fisher theory on page 17 of his book [ 2]:

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Narod SA, Sopik V (2018) Is invasion a necessary step for metastases in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4644-3 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hollingsworth AB (2016) Mammography and early breast cancer detection: how screening saves lives. McFarland & Company Inc, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Narod SA, Sopik V (2018) Is invasion a necessary step for metastases in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4702-5 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher B (1985) The revolution in breast cancer surgery: science or anecdotalism? World J Surg 9:655–666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher B, Anderson SJ (2010) The breast cancer alternative hypothesis: is there evidence to justify replacing it? J Clin Oncol 28:366–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH et al (2011) Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 260:658–663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Narod SA (2014) Reflections on screening mammography and the early detection of breast cancer: a Countercurrents Series. Curr Oncol 21:210–214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307:1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lång K, Andersson I, Rosso A, Tingberg A, Timberg P, Zackrisson S (2016) Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study. Eur Radiol 26:184–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H, Leutner C, Schild HH, Schrading S (2017) Supplemental breast mr imaging screening of women with average risk of breast cancer. Radiology 283:361–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    American Cancer Society (2017) Breast cancer facts & figures 2017–2018. American Cancer Society Inc, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maxwell AJ, Clements K, Hilton B et al (2018) Risk factors for the development of invasive cancer in unresected ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Surg Oncol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.12.007 PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Women’s College Hospital Research InstituteTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations