Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term risk of second malignancies in women after breast conservation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ or early-stage breast cancer

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or early-stage breast cancer have an excellent prognosis, but their risk of developing second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) is not well established. We analyzed SMNs in a large cohort with long follow-up after breast conservation therapy.

Methods

The study population comprised 755 women with DCIS (n = 135) or stage I-II breast carcinoma (n = 620). Subjects were aged 25-89 (median 55) years when they underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy to the entire breast (60-68Gray) between 1992 and 2001. Additional treatment included hormonal therapy and/or chemotherapy based on clinical characteristics. SMNs were grouped by site. The rate of SMNs over time was determined using the Kaplan–Meier method. To compare the probability of developing SMNs overall and for specific organs or sites, probability estimates were obtained for a 55-year-old female from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER).

Results

Median follow-up from radiotherapy was 13.8 years. The 15-year age-adjusted probability of developing any SMN was 12.0%, close to the SEER rate of 12.1% for a non-breast malignancy. Systemic therapy and higher-dose radiotherapy (> 63 Gray) were not associated with significantly increased risks of SMNs. Compared to SEER, significantly increased risk was noted for gynecologic cancers and melanoma.

Conclusions

Most SMNs were unrelated to treatment, and the 15-year incidence was similar to that of cancer in the SEER control group—findings that should be reassuring to patients. Further risk reduction is expected from prophylactic gynecologic surgery. Continued investigations into genetic links with melanoma are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vapiwala N et al (2017) No impact of breast magnetic resonance imaging on 15-year outcomes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or early-stage invasive breast cancer managed with breast conservation therapy. Cancer 123(8):1324–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Galper S et al (2002) Second nonbreast malignancies after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52(2):406–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke M et al (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matesich SM, Shapiro CL (2003) Second cancers after breast cancer treatment. Semin Oncol 30(6):740–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Soerjomataram I et al (2005) Primary malignancy after primary female breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands, 1972–2001. Breast Cancer Res Treat 93(1):91–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mellemkjær L et al (2006) Risk of second cancer among women with breast cancer. Int J Cancer 118(9):2285–2292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schaapveld M et al (2008) Risk of new primary nonbreast cancers after breast cancer treatment: a Dutch population-based study. J Clin Oncol 26(8):1239–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mery CM et al (2009) Secondary sarcomas after radiotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer 115(18):4055–4063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Gonzalez AB et al (2013) Second solid cancers after radiation therapy: a systematic review of the epidemiologic studies of the radiation dose-response relationship. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86(2):224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamigaki Y, Kawakami K (2011) Risk of second cancer after initial treatment of breast cancer: an Osaka Cancer Registry Database study. Oncol Lett 2(5):963–973

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Grantzau T, Mellemkjaer L, Overgaard J (2013) Second primary cancers after adjuvant radiotherapy in early breast cancer patients: a national population based study under the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Radiother Oncol 106(1):42–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burt LM et al (2017) Risk of secondary malignancies after radiation therapy for breast cancer: comprehensive results. Breast 35:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grantzau T, Overgaard J (2015) Risk of second non-breast cancer after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 762,468 patients. Radiother Oncol 114(1):56–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor C et al (2017) Estimating the risks of breast cancer radiotherapy: evidence from modern radiation doses to the lungs and heart and from previous randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 35(15):1641–1649

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bazire L et al (2017) Risks of second malignancies after breast cancer treatment: long-term results. Cancer Radiother 21(1):10–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Obedian E, Fischer DB, Haffty BG (2000) Second malignancies after treatment of early-stage breast cancer: lumpectomy and radiation therapy versus mastectomy. J Clin Oncol 18(12):2406–2412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yadav BS et al (2009) Nonbreast second malignancies after treatment of primary breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73(5):1489–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton SN et al (2015) Second malignancies after adjuvant radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: is there increased risk with addition of regional radiation to local radiation? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91(5):977–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative, G. (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dong C, Chen L (2014) Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of adjuvant therapy. Mol Clin Oncol 2(3):331–336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eeles RA (1995) Germline mutations in the TP53 gene. Cancer Surv 25:101–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. De Vivo I et al (2000) Novel germline mutations in the PTEN tumour suppressor gene found in women with multiple cancers. J Med Genet 37(5):336–341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Welcsh PL, King MC (2001) BRCA1 and BRCA2 and the genetics of breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Mol Genet 10(7):705–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pal T et al (2005) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases. Cancer 104(12):2807–2816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Walsh T, King MC (2007) Ten genes for inherited breast cancer. Cancer Cell 11(2):103–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Campeau PM, Foulkes WD, Tischkowitz MD (2008) Hereditary breast cancer: new genetic developments, new therapeutic avenues. Hum Genet 124(1):31–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Boffetta P et al (2006) The burden of cancer attributable to alcohol drinking. Int J Cancer 119(4):884–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Anand P et al (2008) Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes. Pharm Res 25(9):2097–2116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McPherson K, Steel CM, Dixon JM (2000) ABC of breast diseases. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ 321(7261):624–628

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Evans HS et al (2001) Incidence of multiple primary cancers in a cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer in southeast England. Br J Cancer 84(3):435–440

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vapiwala N et al (2006) Long-term outcome for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ managed with breast conservation treatment: prognostic significance of reexcision. Cancer J 12(1):25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Solin LJ et al (2008) Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 26(3):386–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ali AN et al (2011) The impact of re-excision and residual disease on local recurrence after breast conservation treatment for patients with early stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 11(6):400–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hill-Kayser CE et al (2011) Long-term clinical and cosmetic outcomes after breast conservation treatment for women with early-stage breast carcinoma according to the type of breast boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(4):1048–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Berman AT et al (2013) Incidence and patterns of distant metastases for patients with early-stage breast cancer after breast conservation treatment. Clin Breast Cancer 13(2):88–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. INTERNET, National Cancer Institute: surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/

  38. Osman SO et al (2014) Volumetric modulated arc therapy and breath-hold in image-guided locoregional left-sided breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol 112(1):17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Offersen BV et al (2015) ESTRO consensus guideline on target volume delineation for elective radiation therapy of early stage breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 114(1):3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Baumann M et al (2016) Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine. Nat Rev Cancer 16(4):234–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bergman L et al (2000) Risk and prognosis of endometrial cancer after tamoxifen for breast cancer. Comprehensive Cancer Centres’ ALERT Group. Assessment of liver and endometrial cancer risk following tamoxifen. Lancet 356(9233):881–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. van Leeuwen FE et al (1994) Risk of endometrial cancer after tamoxifen treatment of breast cancer. Lancet 343(8895):448–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. de Braud F et al (2003) Malignant melanoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 47(1):35–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Goggins W, Gao W, Tsao H (2004) Association between female breast cancer and cutaneous melanoma. Int J Cancer 111(5):792–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Huber, C., et al., Anti-estrogen therapy for breast cancer modifies the risk of subsequent cutaneous melanoma. Cancer prevention research, 2011: p. canprevres. 0332.2011

  46. Borg AK et al (2000) High frequency of multiple melanomas and breast and pancreas carcinomas in CDKN2A mutation-positive melanoma families. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(15):1260–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Plna K, Hemminki K (2001) Re: high frequency of multiple melanomas and breast and pancreas carcinomas in CDKN2A mutation-positive melanoma families. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(4):323–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Debniak T et al (2003) Increased risk of breast cancer in relatives of malignant melanoma patients from families with strong cancer familial aggregation. Eur J Cancer Prev 12(3):241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Vengoechea J, Tallo C (2017) A germline deletion of 9p21. 3 presenting as familial melanoma, astrocytoma and breast cancer: clinical and genetic counselling challenges. J Med Genet 54(10):682–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Breast Cancer Linkage, C (1999) Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(15):1310–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Eisemann N et al (2014) Non-melanoma skin cancer incidence and impact of skin cancer screening on incidence. J Invest Dermatol 134(1):43–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported in part by the University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center Core Grant (P30CA016520) to Wei-Ting Hwang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Vapiwala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Data availability statement:

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kushner, C.J., Hwang, WT., Wang, S. et al. Long-term risk of second malignancies in women after breast conservation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ or early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170, 45–53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4729-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4729-7

Keywords

Navigation