Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of histopathology, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Given its high recurrence risk, guidelines recommend systemic therapy for most patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). While some clinicopathologic factors and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are known to be prognostic in patients receiving chemotherapy, their prognostic implications in systemically untreated patients remain unknown.

Methods

From a cohort of 9982 women with surgically treated non-metastatic breast cancer, all patients with clinically reported ER-negative/borderline (≤10%) disease were selected for central assessment of ER/PR/HER2, histopathology, Ki-67, and TILs. The impact of these parameters on invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Six hundred five patients met the criteria for TNBC (ER/PR < 1% and HER2 negative). Most were T1–2 (95%), N0–1 (86%), grade 3 (88%), and had a Ki-67 >15% (75%). Histologically, 70% were invasive carcinoma of no special type, 16% medullary, 8% metaplastic, and 6% apocrine. The median stromal TIL content was 20%. Four hundred twenty-three (70%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median OS follow-up was 10.6 years. On multivariate analysis, only higher nodal stage, lower TILs, and the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with worse IDFS and OS. Among systemically untreated patients (n = 182), the 5-year IDFS was 69.9% (95% CI 60.7–80.5) [T1a: 82.5% (95% CI 62.8–100), T1b: 67.5% (95% CI 51.9–87.8) and T1c: 67.3% (95% CI 54.9–82.6)], compared to 77.8% (95% CI 68.3–83.6) for systemically treated T1N0. Nodal stage and TILs remained strongly associated with outcomes.

Conclusions

In early-stage TNBC, nodal involvement, TILs, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with IDFS and OS. In systemically untreated TNBC, TILs remained prognostic and the risk of recurrence or death was substantial, even for T1N0 disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797):747–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13(15 Pt 1):4429–4434. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, Sanders ME, Chakravarthy AB, Shyr Y, Pietenpol JA (2011) Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 121(7):2750–2767. doi:10.1172/JCI45014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Purrington KS, Visscher DW, Wang C, Yannoukakos D, Hamann U, Nevanlinna H, Cox A, Giles GG, Eckel-Passow JE, Lakis S, Kotoula V, Fountzilas G, Kabisch M, Rudiger T, Heikkila P, Blomqvist C, Cross SS, Southey MC, Olson JE, Gilbert J, Deming-Halverson S, Kosma VM, Clarke C, Scott R, Jones JL, Zheng W, Mannermaa A, Jane Carpenter for AI, Eccles DM, Vachon CM, Couch FJ (2016) Genes associated with histopathologic features of triple negative breast tumors predict molecular subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(1):117–131. doi:10.1007/s10549-016-3775-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prat A, Adamo B, Cheang MC, Anders CK, Carey LA, Perou CM (2013) Molecular characterization of basal-like and non-basal-like triple-negative breast cancer. Oncologist 18(2):123–133. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Network NCC Breast Cancer (Version 2.2017). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf

  7. Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Darb-Esfahani S, Ingold Heppner B, Klauschen F, Furlanetto J, Pfitzner B, Huober J, Schmitt W, Blohmer J-U, Kümmel S, Engels K, Lederer B, Schneeweiss A, Hartmann A, Jakisch C, Untch M, Hanusch C, Weber K, Loibl S (2017) Abstract S1-09: evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as predictive and prognostic biomarker in different subtypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy—a metaanalysis of 3771 patients. Cancer Res 77(4 Supplement):S1–S09. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-s1-09

    Google Scholar 

  8. Denkert C, Loibl S, Noske A, Roller M, Muller BM, Komor M, Budczies J, Darb-Esfahani S, Kronenwett R, Hanusch C, von Torne C, Weichert W, Engels K, Solbach C, Schrader I, Dietel M, von Minckwitz G (2010) Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):105–113. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamaguchi R, Tanaka M, Yano A, Tse GM, Yamaguchi M, Koura K, Kanomata N, Kawaguchi A, Akiba J, Naito Y, Ohshima K, Yano H (2012) Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are important pathologic predictors for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Hum Pathol 43(10):1688–1694. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2011.12.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. West NR, Milne K, Truong PT, Macpherson N, Nelson BH, Watson PH (2011) Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 13(6):R126. doi:10.1186/bcr3072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ono M, Tsuda H, Shimizu C, Yamamoto S, Shibata T, Yamamoto H, Hirata T, Yonemori K, Ando M, Tamura K, Katsumata N, Kinoshita T, Takiguchi Y, Tanzawa H, Fujiwara Y (2012) Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(3):793–805. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1554-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loi S, Sirtaine N, Piette F, Salgado R, Viale G, Van Eenoo F, Rouas G, Francis P, Crown JP, Hitre E, de Azambuja E, Quinaux E, Di Leo A, Michiels S, Piccart MJ, Sotiriou C (2013) Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98. J Clin Oncol 31(7):860–867. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loi S, Michiels S, Salgado R, Sirtaine N, Jose V, Fumagalli D, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Bono P, Kataja V, Desmedt C, Piccart MJ, Loibl S, Denkert C, Smyth MJ, Joensuu H, Sotiriou C (2014) Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: results from the FinHER trial. Ann Oncol 25(8):1544–1550. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adams S, Gray RJ, Demaria S, Goldstein L, Perez EA, Shulman LN, Martino S, Wang M, Jones VE, Saphner TJ, Wolff AC, Wood WC, Davidson NE, Sledge GW, Sparano JA, Badve SS (2014) Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers from two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199. J Clin Oncol 32(27):2959–2966. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.55.0491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pruneri G, Vingiani A, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N, De Rose A, Palazzo A, Colleoni AM, Goldhirsch A, Viale G (2016) Clinical validity of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes analysis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 27(2):249–256. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harbeck N, Rody A (2012) Lost in translation? Estrogen receptor status and endocrine responsiveness in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(7):686–689. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17(5):1474–1481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, Hicks DG, Lester S, Love R, Mangu PB, McShane L, Miller K, Osborne CK, Paik S, Perlmutter J, Rhodes A, Sasano H, Schwartz JN, Sweep FC, Taube S, Torlakovic EE, Valenstein P, Viale G, Visscher D, Wheeler T, Williams RB, Wittliff JL, Wolff AC (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, Paik S, Perez EA, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, Hayes DF, American Society of Clinical O, College of American P (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3997–4013. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, Sirtaine N, Klauschen F, Pruneri G, Wienert S, Van den Eynden G, Baehner FL, Penault-Llorca F, Perez EA, Thompson EA, Symmans WF, Richardson AL, Brock J, Criscitiello C, Bailey H, Ignatiadis M, Floris G, Sparano J, Kos Z, Nielsen T, Rimm DL, Allison KH, Reis-Filho JS, Loibl S, Sotiriou C, Viale G, Badve S, Adams S, Willard-Gallo K, Loi S, International TWG (2015) The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann Oncol 26(2):259–271. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Costantino JP, Gray RJ, Pritchard KI, Chapman J-AW, Sparano JA, Hunsberger S, Enos RA, Gelber RD, Zujewski JA (2007) Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. J Clin Oncol 25(15):2127–2132. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zitvogel L, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Kroemer G (2008) Immunological aspects of cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 8(1):59–73. doi:10.1038/nri2216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huober J, Gelber S, Goldhirsch A, Coates AS, Viale G, Ohlschlegel C, Price KN, Gelber RD, Regan MM, Thurlimann B (2012) Prognosis of medullary breast cancer: analysis of 13 International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials. Ann Oncol 23(11):2843–2851. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen IC, Lin CH, Huang CS, Lien HC, Hsu C, Kuo WH, Lu YS, Cheng AL (2011) Lack of efficacy to systemic chemotherapy for treatment of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast in the modern era. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130(1):345–351. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1686-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi R, Horii R, Maeda I, Suga S, Makita M, Iwase T, Oguchi M, Ito Y, Akiyama F (2010) Clinicopathologic study of 53 metaplastic breast carcinomas: their elements and prognostic implications. Hum Pathol 41(5):679–685. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2009.10.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jung SY, Kim HY, Nam BH, Min SY, Lee SJ, Park C, Kwon Y, Kim EA, Ko KL, Shin KH, Lee KS, Park IH, Lee S, Kim SW, Kang HS, Ro J (2010) Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120(3):627–637. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0780-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lester TR, Hunt KK, Nayeemuddin KM, Bassett RL Jr, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Feig BW, Huo L, Rourke LL, Davis WG, Valero V, Gilcrease MZ (2012) Metaplastic sarcomatoid carcinoma of the breast appears more aggressive than other triple receptor-negative breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(1):41–48. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1393-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thike AA, Yong-Zheng Chong L, Cheok PY, Li HH, Wai-Cheong Yip G, Huat Bay B, Tse GM, Iqbal J, Tan PH (2014) Loss of androgen receptor expression predicts early recurrence in triple-negative and basal-like breast cancer. Mod Pathol 27(3):352–360. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2013.145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Masuda H, Baggerly KA, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Meric-Bernstam F, Valero V, Lehmann BD, Pietenpol JA, Hortobagyi GN, Symmans WF, Ueno NT (2013) Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 19(19):5533–5540. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Group EBCTC (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):432–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine; the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center (Grant Number CA15083-40A2 to MPG, JNI); George M. Eisenberg Foundation for Charities; the Mayo Clinic Breast SPORE (Grant Number P50CA 116201-9 to MPG, FJC, JNI, DWV, MP, KRK); and NIH Grant R01CA192393.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew P. Goetz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Mei-Yin Polley, Heshan Liu, Judith A. Gilbert, Victoria Cafourek, David W. Hillman, Ahmed Elkhanany, Margaret Akinhanmi, Jenna Lilyquist, Abigail Thomas, Vivian Negron, Judy C. Boughey, Minetta C. Liu, James N. Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Fergus J. Couch, Daniel W. Visscher, and Matthew P. Goetz declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

The need for obtaining informed consent was waived by the institutional review board, given that this study was retrospective and non-interventional.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 572 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leon-Ferre, R.A., Polley, MY., Liu, H. et al. Impact of histopathology, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and adjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167, 89–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4499-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4499-7

Keywords

Navigation